Suspicious-Teach8788
Lifer
- Feb 19, 2001
- 20,155
- 23
- 81
Both guns and cars are inanimate objects that pose NO threat to anyone until and unless they are manipulated by a human being.
No deaths result from the existence of these objects, or from their design. It's the intent of the manipulator that opens up the possibility for harm.
So let's focus on the manipulator, to solve the problem.
Stop trying to equate guns with cars. They're two different things. You can replace those two words guns and cars in your sentence with water bottle and baseball bat.
You're not incorrect, but using a 30,000 feet analogy for thse two objects to equate them? Ehh.
The differences between a car and gun are simple, but like I've said again and again, their primary purposes are different. Because their primary purposes are different, you would expect different levels of interest in deaths resulting from the use of each.
Furthermore, the nature of deaths are different. Car deaths are mainly due to negligence and idiotic behavior. If you wanted to put this in gun terms it's giving your 3 year old a gun and having the gun go off accidentally and killing a parent. But that's not the case. Homicides and murders are common amongst gun deaths.
Also I mentioned the use pattern of cars and guns are totally different. We use cars far more and more of us are engaged in vehicular use on a daily basis for far more time. Using a gun for an hour versus driving an hour is something totally different. You can't compare fataility rates at all. It just doesn't even make sense.
