A mobile short range tactical nuclear missle.
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: DerwenArtos12
40 yards with light armor. I will change my vote to a 232. I have seen a hollow point 232 blow apart a concrete block at about 100 yards. We acidentally got a couple military issue teflon coated ones and they went through the concrete block before the hollow points blew it up.
It's not difficult to break up a concrete block with a bullet. .223 is a very small round just slightly larger than .22 long rifle but moving much much faster. I wouldn't make a choice like this based on what you saw a round do to a block of concrete which is very easy to break up. Actually, your choice isn't a bad one...just your reasoning is. I doubt .223 would penetrate body armor though. You would do well to aim for a headshot.
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: DerwenArtos12
40 yards with light armor. I will change my vote to a 232. I have seen a hollow point 232 blow apart a concrete block at about 100 yards. We acidentally got a couple military issue teflon coated ones and they went through the concrete block before the hollow points blew it up.
It's not difficult to break up a concrete block with a bullet. .223 is a very small round just slightly larger than .22 long rifle but moving much much faster. I wouldn't make a choice like this based on what you saw a round do to a block of concrete which is very easy to break up. Actually, your choice isn't a bad one...just your reasoning is. I doubt .223 would penetrate body armor though. You would do well to aim for a headshot.
Good 223 AP rounds will go through armor pretty well at 40 yards. It wont go through a Class 4 on the first round, obviously, but I think most SWAT squads wear Class 3 at the most, not Class 4.
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: DerwenArtos12
40 yards with light armor. I will change my vote to a 232. I have seen a hollow point 232 blow apart a concrete block at about 100 yards. We acidentally got a couple military issue teflon coated ones and they went through the concrete block before the hollow points blew it up.
It's not difficult to break up a concrete block with a bullet. .223 is a very small round just slightly larger than .22 long rifle but moving much much faster. I wouldn't make a choice like this based on what you saw a round do to a block of concrete which is very easy to break up. Actually, your choice isn't a bad one...just your reasoning is. I doubt .223 would penetrate body armor though. You would do well to aim for a headshot.
Good 223 AP rounds will go through armor pretty well at 40 yards. It wont go through a Class 4 on the first round, obviously, but I think most SWAT squads wear Class 3 at the most, not Class 4.
The doormen on our decentralized ERT teams routinely wear level IV vests when serving no knock search warrants.
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: DerwenArtos12
40 yards with light armor. I will change my vote to a 232. I have seen a hollow point 232 blow apart a concrete block at about 100 yards. We acidentally got a couple military issue teflon coated ones and they went through the concrete block before the hollow points blew it up.
It's not difficult to break up a concrete block with a bullet. .223 is a very small round just slightly larger than .22 long rifle but moving much much faster. I wouldn't make a choice like this based on what you saw a round do to a block of concrete which is very easy to break up. Actually, your choice isn't a bad one...just your reasoning is. I doubt .223 would penetrate body armor though. You would do well to aim for a headshot.
Good 223 AP rounds will go through armor pretty well at 40 yards. It wont go through a Class 4 on the first round, obviously, but I think most SWAT squads wear Class 3 at the most, not Class 4.
Here ya go... AvengerOriginally posted by: lowfatbaconboy
something that fires depleted uranium 😀
blah
Originally posted by: DerwenArtos12
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: DerwenArtos12
40 yards with light armor. I will change my vote to a 232. I have seen a hollow point 232 blow apart a concrete block at about 100 yards. We acidentally got a couple military issue teflon coated ones and they went through the concrete block before the hollow points blew it up.
It's not difficult to break up a concrete block with a bullet. .223 is a very small round just slightly larger than .22 long rifle but moving much much faster. I wouldn't make a choice like this based on what you saw a round do to a block of concrete which is very easy to break up. Actually, your choice isn't a bad one...just your reasoning is. I doubt .223 would penetrate body armor though. You would do well to aim for a headshot.
Good 223 AP rounds will go through armor pretty well at 40 yards. It wont go through a Class 4 on the first round, obviously, but I think most SWAT squads wear Class 3 at the most, not Class 4.
Are you kidding? from 40 yards you put a not teflon coated bullet through inch thick lexan. And my point about making the block explode was that the rounds are so small I would expect even the holow points to go right through the block, considering their muzzle velocity. You could pretty easily go through a riot shield and through a class 4 vest from 40 yards with teflon coated bullets in a 223. And though they are illegal if you go buy a 100 pack of 223 non-hollow point you are almost gaurinteed to get a couple as the same company make the coated and non-coated.
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: K1052
FAL with a 12 inch barrel and a 30 round mags
Edit: on second thought 50 caliber Mark 7
Thats a 16.5" wide bullet, or 1650 caliber. He said rifle/shotgun, not naval cannon.
I said it before and I'll say it again, teflon coating has no effect on penetration.You could pretty easily go through a riot shield and through a class 4 vest from 40 yards with teflon coated bullets in a 223. And though they are illegal if you go buy a 100 pack of 223 non-hollow point you are almost gaurinteed to get a couple as the same company make the coated and non-coated.
I said it before and I'll say it again, teflon coating has no effect on penetration.
Ok, I revert to my original statement: Very little or no penetration. Na na na na na-na 😛Originally posted by: Mingon
I said it before and I'll say it again, teflon coating has no effect on penetration.
Thats not 100% accurate, teflon can help penetration through increased muzzle velocity and free air velocity, but only minute amounts 1% or less.
Originally posted by: Jmmsbnd007
And though they are illegal if you go buy a 100 pack of 223 non-hollow point you are almost gaurinteed to get a couple as the same company make the coated and non-coated.
Originally posted by: Munchies
Originally posted by: oSReApEr
Originally posted by: DainBramaged
Barrett .50 cal. Deagle.
Game over.
If you were to fire the barrett incorrectly u run the risk of fracturing your sholder or breaking your collar bone, and a Desert Eagle .50 cal can fracture ur wrist if not help properly (Its very heavy). Thos weapons are overkill lol and the .50 AE is very inaccurate due to extrodinary recoil. The Barret .50 BMG is very bad in an urban situation due to its brute power. It would rip through your target and possible go through a few layers of brick inflicting death/injury to civilans 🙁
Barrets can't crack your shoulder unless your a 4 foot pasty geek girl. They incorporate a MASSIVE mussle brake, thats why they have such a large flash. They have the recoil of a 12 gauge on fulll choke. Ive never heard of anyone cracking their shoulder
Originally posted by: oSReApEr
Also the comment i made about the .50 AE was information i got from a range owner out in Long Island NY. He told me that whenever he sees people with .50 deagles they shoot badly do to the caliber size so none if this info is from my actual experience w/ the gun. My bad🙁