Noticed there's a 4gb gtx960 from EVGA on Newegg for
$239,$30 cheaper then the Sapphire 290 Tri-x.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...7128&cm_re=evga_gtx960-_-14-487-128-_-Product
Honestly curious if this is a true 4gb card.
Wow, that's terribly overpriced. A stock 960 should be $149 and the 4GB version $179. 280X
levels it and regularly sells for
$190-200 on Newegg.
In the latest reviews with newer games 960 continues to perform worse and worse, much closer to a 760 and further away from a 280X.
280X is now
21% faster at 1080P
While neither 280X nor 960 is good enough for 1440p gaming, 1440p demands are a good indication of how these cards will fair at 1080P once newer demanding games come out (i.e., because it allows us to simulate what would happen under even more strenuous workloads).
Not surprisingly, 960 gets crushed by
30% compared to a 280X once graphical demands increase on the GPU.
What makes things worse is that a stock reference R9 290 is 53% faster at 1080P and an astounding 61% faster at 1440p. However, one can purchase after-market 290s which are as fast as a 290X (Uber):
Sapphire Tri-X R9 290 @ Newegg for
$240 after $10 off and MIR
Asus DirectCUII R9 290 @ NCIXUS for
$260
That's up to 75% more performance for just $50-70 more and double the VRAM. Insane, absolutely insane value!
I've
never seen a mid-range $200-230 NV being such an awful price/performance value compared to $180-270 AMD/ATI cards! Seriously even getting a new $50 PSU and an after-market 290 still makes it a better deal than a $200 960 or a $240 960 4GB. :thumbsdown:
It's insane at the power of branding when NV charges absurd premiums for 8-15% more performance for a 980 over 290X and for Titan X over 290X but gamers are unwilling to pay $50-70 extra for a card 50-60% faster than a 960 in an after-market 290!
As I have said from 960's launch, if one has to have an NV card, pay extra for a 970.