Ground Worker Dies When Ingested by Aircraft Engine

djheater

Lifer
Mar 19, 2001
14,637
2
0
Originally posted by: Fritzo
SLURP!!!

Stupid reporter. It would seem obvious that an object without a digestive tract cannot ingest something. Still had to go for the snappy headline though...:roll:
 

Itchrelief

Golden Member
Dec 20, 2005
1,398
0
71
Did they just put up stock footage of any old jet engine? Aren't 737 engines usually in an underwing nacelle?
 

biggestmuff

Diamond Member
Mar 20, 2001
8,201
2
0
Originally posted by: djheater

Stupid reporter. It would seem obvious that an object without a digestive tract cannot ingest something. Still had to go for the snappy headline though...:roll:

Don't forget about the stock photo that isn't of a 37-8.

 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,923
17
81
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Fritzo
SLURP!!!

Stupid reporter. It would seem obvious that an object without a digestive tract cannot ingest something. Still had to go for the snappy headline though...:roll:

I believe that 'ingested' is the correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.
 
S

SlitheryDee

Originally posted by: Ricemarine
Near 6:00 p.m. that evening, airport personnel started to clean the scene and examine the aircraft's engine.

Tells you how much a soul is worth over there :laugh:


What they should've retired the plane or something?
 
Jun 4, 2005
19,723
1
0
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Fritzo
SLURP!!!

Stupid reporter. It would seem obvious that an object without a digestive tract cannot ingest something. Still had to go for the snappy headline though...:roll:

I believe that 'ingested' is the correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Nope, unless the engine some how absrobed him as nourishment.
 

datalink7

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
16,765
6
81
Originally posted by: DaY
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Fritzo
SLURP!!!

Stupid reporter. It would seem obvious that an object without a digestive tract cannot ingest something. Still had to go for the snappy headline though...:roll:

I believe that 'ingested' is the correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Nope, unless the engine some how absrobed him as nourishment.

in·gest P Pronunciation Key (n-jst)
tr.v. in·gest·ed, in·gest·ing, in·gests
1. To take into the body by the mouth for digestion or absorption. See Synonyms at eat.
2. To take in and absorb as food: ?Marine ciliates... can be observed... ingesting other single-celled creatures and harvesting their chloroplasts? (Carol Kaesuk Yoon).
3. The correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Note number 3.
 

biggestmuff

Diamond Member
Mar 20, 2001
8,201
2
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Ricemarine
Near 6:00 p.m. that evening, airport personnel started to clean the scene and examine the aircraft's engine.

Tells you how much a soul is worth over there :laugh:


What the hell are you talking about?

No kidding.

Yeah, how dare they check the engine and begin cleanup 3 hours after the accident! :confused:

 

amol

Lifer
Jul 8, 2001
11,680
3
81
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: DaY
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Fritzo
SLURP!!!

Stupid reporter. It would seem obvious that an object without a digestive tract cannot ingest something. Still had to go for the snappy headline though...:roll:

I believe that 'ingested' is the correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Nope, unless the engine some how absrobed him as nourishment.

in·gest P Pronunciation Key (n-jst)
tr.v. in·gest·ed, in·gest·ing, in·gests
1. To take into the body by the mouth for digestion or absorption. See Synonyms at eat.
2. To take in and absorb as food: ?Marine ciliates... can be observed... ingesting other single-celled creatures and harvesting their chloroplasts? (Carol Kaesuk Yoon).
3. The correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Note number 3.

source?
 

datalink7

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
16,765
6
81
Originally posted by: Amol
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: DaY
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Fritzo
SLURP!!!

Stupid reporter. It would seem obvious that an object without a digestive tract cannot ingest something. Still had to go for the snappy headline though...:roll:

I believe that 'ingested' is the correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Nope, unless the engine some how absrobed him as nourishment.

in·gest P Pronunciation Key (n-jst)
tr.v. in·gest·ed, in·gest·ing, in·gests
1. To take into the body by the mouth for digestion or absorption. See Synonyms at eat.
2. To take in and absorb as food: ?Marine ciliates... can be observed... ingesting other single-celled creatures and harvesting their chloroplasts? (Carol Kaesuk Yoon).
3. The correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Note number 3.

source?

First two, dictionary.com

Third one, my ass :p
 
Jun 4, 2005
19,723
1
0
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: DaY
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Fritzo
SLURP!!!

Stupid reporter. It would seem obvious that an object without a digestive tract cannot ingest something. Still had to go for the snappy headline though...:roll:

I believe that 'ingested' is the correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Nope, unless the engine some how absrobed him as nourishment.

in·gest P Pronunciation Key (n-jst)
tr.v. in·gest·ed, in·gest·ing, in·gests
1. To take into the body by the mouth for digestion or absorption. See Synonyms at eat.
2. To take in and absorb as food: ?Marine ciliates... can be observed... ingesting other single-celled creatures and harvesting their chloroplasts? (Carol Kaesuk Yoon).
3. The correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Note number 3.

:laugh: