• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Ground Worker Dies When Ingested by Aircraft Engine

Originally posted by: Fritzo
SLURP!!!

Stupid reporter. It would seem obvious that an object without a digestive tract cannot ingest something. Still had to go for the snappy headline though...:roll:
 
Originally posted by: djheater

Stupid reporter. It would seem obvious that an object without a digestive tract cannot ingest something. Still had to go for the snappy headline though...:roll:

Don't forget about the stock photo that isn't of a 37-8.

 
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Fritzo
SLURP!!!

Stupid reporter. It would seem obvious that an object without a digestive tract cannot ingest something. Still had to go for the snappy headline though...:roll:

I believe that 'ingested' is the correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.
 
Originally posted by: Ricemarine
Near 6:00 p.m. that evening, airport personnel started to clean the scene and examine the aircraft's engine.

Tells you how much a soul is worth over there :laugh:


What they should've retired the plane or something?
 
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Fritzo
SLURP!!!

Stupid reporter. It would seem obvious that an object without a digestive tract cannot ingest something. Still had to go for the snappy headline though...:roll:

I believe that 'ingested' is the correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Nope, unless the engine some how absrobed him as nourishment.
 
Originally posted by: DaY
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Fritzo
SLURP!!!

Stupid reporter. It would seem obvious that an object without a digestive tract cannot ingest something. Still had to go for the snappy headline though...:roll:

I believe that 'ingested' is the correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Nope, unless the engine some how absrobed him as nourishment.

in·gest P Pronunciation Key (n-jst)
tr.v. in·gest·ed, in·gest·ing, in·gests
1. To take into the body by the mouth for digestion or absorption. See Synonyms at eat.
2. To take in and absorb as food: ?Marine ciliates... can be observed... ingesting other single-celled creatures and harvesting their chloroplasts? (Carol Kaesuk Yoon).
3. The correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Note number 3.
 
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Ricemarine
Near 6:00 p.m. that evening, airport personnel started to clean the scene and examine the aircraft's engine.

Tells you how much a soul is worth over there :laugh:


What the hell are you talking about?

No kidding.

Yeah, how dare they check the engine and begin cleanup 3 hours after the accident! 😕

 
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: DaY
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Fritzo
SLURP!!!

Stupid reporter. It would seem obvious that an object without a digestive tract cannot ingest something. Still had to go for the snappy headline though...:roll:

I believe that 'ingested' is the correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Nope, unless the engine some how absrobed him as nourishment.

in·gest P Pronunciation Key (n-jst)
tr.v. in·gest·ed, in·gest·ing, in·gests
1. To take into the body by the mouth for digestion or absorption. See Synonyms at eat.
2. To take in and absorb as food: ?Marine ciliates... can be observed... ingesting other single-celled creatures and harvesting their chloroplasts? (Carol Kaesuk Yoon).
3. The correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Note number 3.

source?
 
Originally posted by: Amol
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: DaY
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Fritzo
SLURP!!!

Stupid reporter. It would seem obvious that an object without a digestive tract cannot ingest something. Still had to go for the snappy headline though...:roll:

I believe that 'ingested' is the correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Nope, unless the engine some how absrobed him as nourishment.

in·gest P Pronunciation Key (n-jst)
tr.v. in·gest·ed, in·gest·ing, in·gests
1. To take into the body by the mouth for digestion or absorption. See Synonyms at eat.
2. To take in and absorb as food: ?Marine ciliates... can be observed... ingesting other single-celled creatures and harvesting their chloroplasts? (Carol Kaesuk Yoon).
3. The correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Note number 3.

source?

First two, dictionary.com

Third one, my ass 😛
 
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: DaY
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: djheater
Originally posted by: Fritzo
SLURP!!!

Stupid reporter. It would seem obvious that an object without a digestive tract cannot ingest something. Still had to go for the snappy headline though...:roll:

I believe that 'ingested' is the correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Nope, unless the engine some how absrobed him as nourishment.

in·gest P Pronunciation Key (n-jst)
tr.v. in·gest·ed, in·gest·ing, in·gests
1. To take into the body by the mouth for digestion or absorption. See Synonyms at eat.
2. To take in and absorb as food: ?Marine ciliates... can be observed... ingesting other single-celled creatures and harvesting their chloroplasts? (Carol Kaesuk Yoon).
3. The correct term for when a jet engine sucks up a foreign object.

Note number 3.

:laugh:
 
Back
Top