Graphics card names (numbers) - I have just realised something...

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,938
6
81
nVidia release:
Geforce 3:
Ti 200
Ti
Ti 500

ATi counter: Radeon 8500

500 to go against 500

nVidia release:
Geforce 4
Ti 4200
Ti 4400
Ti 4600

ATi 500 vs nVidia 600 (the two top end cards)

ATi release:
Radeon 9000
9500
9700

nVidia 400 vs ATi 500 (mid range)
nVidia 600 vs ATi 700 (two top end cards)

nVidia release
FX 5200
5600
5800

ATi 100 vs nVidia 200 (low end)
ATi 500 vs nVidia 600 (mid range)
ATi 700 vs nVidia 800 (top end)

ATi release
9200
9600
9800

nVidia 200 vs ATi 200
nVidia 600 vs ATi 600 (mid range)
nVidia 800 vs ATi 800 (top end)

nVidia release
FX 5900

ATi 800 vs nVidia 900

So most of the time, when a company releases new GPU range, they top the opponents numbers by 100 (excet the latest releases by ATi which match)

Just felt like I'd post this observation, and see if anyone thinks there are any comments to be made :p
 

AgaBoogaBoo

Lifer
Feb 16, 2003
26,108
5
81
Very nice find. I think that maybe they do this on purpose and just not based on their own model numbers.
 

EdipisReks

Platinum Member
Sep 30, 2000
2,722
0
0
LOL. i can just imagine marketing people frantically coming up with numbers that just top the competition but don't seem "arrogantly high".
 

Schadenfroh

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2003
38,416
4
0
dont forget 3dfx!
they started the insane number system, cept theirs never represented a step down in performance like nvidia and ati.

voodoo2 1000
would 1500 be the banshee?
voodoo3 2000
wheres the 2500?
voodoo3 3000
voodoo3 3500
voodoo3 4000, supposidly would have 32bit colour support, never released
voodoo4 4500
prototype 32mb pci voodoo5 5000, never released
voodoo5 5500
prototype voodoo5 6000, never released