• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Grand Infrastructure projects....

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,757
46,541
136
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: loki8481
why build new things when we don't even have the money to maintain existing structures?

though I'd kill for better train service in the north east corridor. but there's probably no money in it, no matter how much I'd rather take a train out to penn state than drive 4 hours each way.
If anyone gets better train service it will be the NE corridor and/or California but only probably between the major cities DC-Baltimore-Philadelphia- NYC-Providence-Boston (with maybe a couple other stops along the way) where most of the market is.
High speed train service for the NE makes sense, but not if it will cost $100 billion.

Properly built I'd say its worth the expenditure. If they used something along the lines of the Eurostar trainsets and constructed the route to allow sustained runs at maximum speed (about 190 mph) you would get a lot of people switching from car/air travel. Even better would be to build it around an advanced TGV trainset which can attain speeds closer to 300 mph.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Transportation, clean water, wastewater treatment, clean energy (see the German PV program), schools & public recreation on a priority basis. The highest rankings priorities recieve more credit based upon the local commitment to funding.

Instead of wasting the current surpluses in social security these funds are used for low-interest loans toward the infrastructure projects. (And PJ, stop your obsfucation on 'social' spending. . .)

10-30% Federal Grant
25-75% Federal Loan of SS Funds
Remaing percentage stae and local match
As a country we ?give? away as much as a $1 trillion per year to certain groups via ?social spending.? I am not even counting Social Security because we buy into that in theory.

I have no objection to using government money to improve our country, that is why the government is there, but I question how we are using our money.

$300 billion a year spent on Medicaid which provides limited medical coverage for 50 million people. What if we eliminated Medicaid and spent that money on highways, bridges, airports etc. Would the economic benefit for the ENTIRE population be greater?

That is what I am trying to get at.

BTW we will never get rid of Medicaid, I am speaking in theory. What provides a greater benefit to the country, a billion dollars in ?give aways? or a billion in highway spending?
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: Shivetya
Originally posted by: Mxylplyx
I think they could easily take this out of the military budget by scaling back a few dozen pointless deployments around the world.

What do you think?

Two, why not take it from Entitlement programs which have NO BASIS in the Constitution? At least the military is SUPPOSED to be there.

Stupid, ignorant, and well, just stupid

Yup. I guess you are talking about things like the Social Security Trust Fund (running a surplus) which has been robbed of nearly $3 trillion to pay for your supply-side tax cuts and Bush War.
No he is talking about the $700 billion we spend PER YEAR on Medicaid and Medicare.

$3 trillion? drop in the bucket, that is only 3 years of Medicare and Medicaid spending.
 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Transportation, clean water, wastewater treatment, clean energy (see the German PV program), schools & public recreation on a priority basis. The highest rankings priorities recieve more credit based upon the local commitment to funding.

Instead of wasting the current surpluses in social security these funds are used for low-interest loans toward the infrastructure projects. (And PJ, stop your obsfucation on 'social' spending. . .)

10-30% Federal Grant
25-75% Federal Loan of SS Funds
Remaing percentage stae and local match
As a country we ?give? away as much as a $1 trillion per year to certain groups via ?social spending.? I am not even counting Social Security because we buy into that in theory.

You have told this lie repeatedly without fact. You have been refuted with links to the White House Budget Documents. You have misrepresented the Federal deficit without acknowledging the total annual Federal Debt which exceeds this annual deficit figure by nealy 200%. You have refused to acknowledge that we now pay more than $400 billion a year to service this debt.

My friend, you have no clothes. You have been exposed. Your manipulation and fear will no longer work.

 

Mxylplyx

Diamond Member
Mar 21, 2007
4,197
101
106
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Mxylplyx
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Could you give us an idea of the types of projects you want to build.

And please explain how building the tallest building in the world in NY is going to help those of us living in Florida.

Now a high speed rail line along DC/Boston corridor might make sense, but that is about the only place in the country where there would be enough traffic to make it work.

As someone else already pointed out the rest of your ?grand? projects end up looking more like pork than anything else. I can imagine congress fighting over who gets what.

Also? why take the money out of our defense budget? Why not take it from the $1 trillion we spend per year on social programs?

Tallest building in the world.
Most advanced airport in the world
Most advanced seaport in the world
Highest capacity wind turbine farm in the world.

Anything with the words "Biggest", "Best", "Most Advanced", and "In the World".



ps. If you read my posts around here, you'd know that I'm certainly not a liberal. I'm a proud American that wants something to be proud of again. Seems whenever one wants to read about Americas great accomplishments, they have to get out the history books.

What kind of sad person gains self worth from what others have done? You're just like the people who root for their "hometown" major league sports team. The people on that team have no allegiance. They're in it for the money. They're rarely from that town, and they'll leave once a better offer comes along. The owners don't care about the locals, they're just in it for the free stadium and the massive wealth they can suck out of the local economy. Yet sheep like you continue to cheer and yell while someone else gets rich off your back.

Do something in your life of your own that you can be proud of. It's much more fulfilling than just being a nationalist drone. My pride doesn't rely on the accomplishments of others.

This country is built on the proud accomplishments of all of us. The things you are proud of are based on the accomplishments of others more than you realize. I am proud of my home, built by others. I am proud of my wife, who I met at a university built by others. I am proud of my son, who was born at a hospital chock full of medical technology pioneered by others. I am also proud of my local sports team, simply because I enjoy rooting for them. Sometimes life is better when you are not cynical about everything like you appear to be.

 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
eh - don't like it. I'd rather build 10 hospitals with cutting edge technology to aid metropolitan areas than one super mega duper plex "hospital of the future" that will cost 10X for that last additional 5% care.

Its about thinking big - but still being practical.

The sentiments of Genx87 and bobberfett are right here~

Rather than something stupid like the world's tallest building - how about a decent tram system (as MANY others have echoed) in the parts of the USA that could actually use it? How about maintaing, upgrading, fixing, and expanding current highway systems such that we don't watch the load of cars increase by a factor of 2 while the capacity barely increases 5%.

Imagine what - with proper re tooling of the education system - that 50-60 billion could do in terms of updating the technology and increasing teacher pay

I'd rather see that money refunded, or put to use for things that are actually needed by the general population.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Mxylplyx
Wouldnt it be great if every fiscal year, our government set aside 50 billion or so to fund grand infrastructure projects that could be chosen by the people? Yearly committes could be formed that consists of city leaders, artists, architects, and even regular citizens, who would come up with various ideas that could be presented to the people, and the people could vote on which one(s) they want to see funded. These would be projects that make the whole country stand back and go "Wow", and just well up with pride that such a thing was built here in America. This would allow us to cast aside practicality and budget concerns every once in a while, and do something just so we could feel good about it and be proud to be Americans. Kind of like going to the moon, which didnt have much practical purpose at the time.

I think they could easily take this out of the military budget by scaling back a few dozen pointless deployments around the world.

What do you think?

Sorry your heroes have trumped your idea with a toll system which is a tax on everyone but the rich.

See my thread on Federal tax dollars being used to implement system throughout major cities in the U.S. starting with New York.

You must be thrilled although obviously behind the curve of information.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
As a country we ?give? away as much as a $1 trillion per year to certain groups via ?social spending.? I am not even counting Social Security because we buy into that in theory.
You have told this lie repeatedly without fact. You have been refuted with links to the White House Budget Documents. You have misrepresented the Federal deficit without acknowledging the total annual Federal Debt which exceeds this annual deficit figure by nealy 200%. You have refused to acknowledge that we now pay more than $400 billion a year to service this debt.

My friend, you have no clothes. You have been exposed. Your manipulation and fear will no longer work.
Some facts for you...
Bottom of the page
Medicare and Medicaid spending in FY 2008 will be $628 billion.
link 2
Food and Nutrition Service aka Food Stamps etc $50 billion in FY 2008.
link 3
Pell Grants: money given to poor people without need of pay back $13 billion in FY 2008
link 4
Public Housing, Project-based Rental Assistance, Tenant-based Rental Assistance $27 billion FY 2008

We are up to $718 billion in Federal spending on social programs.

State spending is a little harder to detail since there are 50 states.
So I'll go with what figures I can find
link 5
"Total state Medicaid spending reached $243.6 billion" that was for 2004. I am guessing that we are spending more today, but we can go with that figure.

We are now up to $961 billion in spending on social programs. I am sure if I dig deeper I can easily find another $40 billion between state and local governments.

Would you care to amend your earlier statement, or do you have some kind of proof that shows my figures are incorrect.


As for the rest of your post? aren?t you the guy who accused me of ?obfuscation? just a few posts ago? And yet here you are talking about the deficit, debt etc. For the record I know the difference between debt and deficit and I know how much we spend on debt management.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Originally posted by: Mxylplyx
This country is built on the proud accomplishments of all of us. The things you are proud of are based on the accomplishments of others more than you realize. I am proud of my home, built by others. I am proud of my wife, who I met at a university built by others. I am proud of my son, who was born at a hospital chock full of medical technology pioneered by others. I am also proud of my local sports team, simply because I enjoy rooting for them. Sometimes life is better when you make others pay for the follies you take pride in.

Fixed.

And it's one thing to recognize that your accomplishments are built on the foundation laid by others. It's something completely different to expect others to waste money and effort on projects which obviously don't have enough merit to stand on their own. Keep your pork to yourself. If you want a bridge to nowhere, you build it. Why should I?
 

Mxylplyx

Diamond Member
Mar 21, 2007
4,197
101
106
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Mxylplyx
This country is built on the proud accomplishments of all of us. The things you are proud of are based on the accomplishments of others more than you realize. I am proud of my home, built by others. I am proud of my wife, who I met at a university built by others. I am proud of my son, who was born at a hospital chock full of medical technology pioneered by others. I am also proud of my local sports team, simply because I enjoy rooting for them. Sometimes life is better when you make others pay for the follies you take pride in.

Fixed.

And it's one thing to recognize that your accomplishments are built on the foundation laid by others. It's something completely different to expect others to waste money and effort on projects which obviously don't have enough merit to stand on their own. Keep your pork to yourself. If you want a bridge to nowhere, you build it. Why should I?

The bridge to nowhere argument doesnt hold up, because I proposed a voting system where the general population votes on these projects, not politicians trying to funnel money to their business buddies.

 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
This country is not capable of grand projects. Get over it already. We are all about ourselves now.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
Originally posted by: Mxylplyx
The bridge to nowhere argument doesnt hold up, because I proposed a voting system where the general population votes on these projects, not politicians trying to funnel money to their business buddies.

oh god... do you really want 50 billion a year spent building statues of paris hilton and american idol contestants?
 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
As a country we ?give? away as much as a $1 trillion per year to certain groups via ?social spending.? I am not even counting Social Security because we buy into that in theory.
You have told this lie repeatedly without fact. You have been refuted with links to the White House Budget Documents. You have misrepresented the Federal deficit without acknowledging the total annual Federal Debt which exceeds this annual deficit figure by nealy 200%. You have refused to acknowledge that we now pay more than $400 billion a year to service this debt.

My friend, you have no clothes. You have been exposed. Your manipulation and fear will no longer work.
Some facts for you...
Bottom of the page
Medicare and Medicaid spending in FY 2008 will be $628 billion.
link 2
Food and Nutrition Service aka Food Stamps etc $50 billion in FY 2008.
link 3
Pell Grants: money given to poor people without need of pay back $13 billion in FY 2008
link 4
Public Housing, Project-based Rental Assistance, Tenant-based Rental Assistance $27 billion FY 2008

We are up to $718 billion in Federal spending on social programs.

State spending is a little harder to detail since there are 50 states.
So I'll go with what figures I can find
link 5
"Total state Medicaid spending reached $243.6 billion" that was for 2004. I am guessing that we are spending more today, but we can go with that figure.

We are now up to $961 billion in spending on social programs. I am sure if I dig deeper I can easily find another $40 billion between state and local governments.

Would you care to amend your earlier statement, or do you have some kind of proof that shows my figures are incorrect.


As for the rest of your post? aren?t you the guy who accused me of ?obfuscation? just a few posts ago? And yet here you are talking about the deficit, debt etc. For the record I know the difference between debt and deficit and I know how much we spend on debt management.

No. Because once again you choose to manipulate and obsfucate Federal Spending, Federal Receipts & Federal Debt - which is the object of this discussion. Thank you for attempting to add state spending to qualify your manipulation of the matter at hand and thereby prove my point. From White House Fiscal Year 2008 Budget of the United States Government Historical Tables

The Federal expense for Medicaid for FY 2007 is estimated at $192 billion. (In constant FY 2000 dollars this is effectively worth $163 billion because the rate of increase in the cost of medical care far exceeds that of the rate of inflation).

The Federal expense for Medicare for FY 2007 is estimated at $367 billion of which $185 billion is paid with Medicare taxes. (In constant FY 2000 dollars this is effectively worth $314 billion because the rate of increase in the cost of medical care far exceeds that of the rate of inflation).

Seems to me when you do the math the actual Federal expense of Medicaid/Medicare equals $374 billion. Let's talk about Medicare after this:

<Food and nutrition assistance
Family and Other Support Assistance
Payments to States for foster care/adoption assistance
Housing Assistance and Other

equals $97 billion dollars

Seems to me when we add thses numbers together we are coming up somewhere in the range of $471 billion of which more than 75% of this cost is Medicare.

Please feel free to add to these totals items such as Pell Grants, Federal employee retirement, Veterans benefits and Unemployment compensation. I think we will find the wind blown out of your compassionate conservative sails. I will note that Congress cut Pell Grant funding from $13.6 billion to $12.7 billion for FY2008 and that unemployment compensation is offset by trust fund revenues - gosh, you forgot to point that out. You are welcome to view every line item in the Federal budget from Education to Environmental Protection and list them item by item. I'd like to see where you will 'cut' the Federal Budget and eliminate those pesky give-a-ways. But if you and your buddies perpetually throw out venom like "Slash the Trillion Dollar Federal Entitlements" you need to be much, much more honest in your propoganda.

Now let's look at the 'universally accepted' biggest problem in the Federal Budget. MEDICARE

Medicare taxes pay for Part A Medicare hospital benefits. Employers and employees pay these taxes. You are welcome to look up the rates on Google.

Medicare Part B Premium Medical Insurance is paid by the recipient and covers approximately 1/4th the cost of providing Part B medical benefits.

The cost of these premiums is allocated as follows:

If you and your wife make less than or equal to $160,000/yr your monthly premium is $93.50.

If you and your wife make greater than $160,000 and less than or equal to $200,000/yr your monthly premium is $105.80.

If you and your wife make greater than $200,000 and less than or equal to $300,000/yr your monthly premium is $124.40.

If you and your wife make greater than $300,000 and less than or equal to $400,000/yr your monthly premium is $142.90.

If you and your wife make greater than $400,000/yr your monthly premium is $161.40.


I think I see what the problem is here. How about you, Johnny?

And considering that our medical dollar is buying more than 15% less medical care (or much greater!) than it did in 2000 I'm also starting to see a trend.

And just for sheets and giggles let everyone look at your propaganda and compassionate conservatism from the Ronald Reagan School for Supply-Sider Truthy Propaganda.

We are on track to exceed another $530 billion in debt this fiscal year 'down' from $574 billion in the previous fiscal year. ProfJohn says, "See, supply-side economics is not voodoo afterall. We are only going in debt a measely half a trillion dollars this year!"

I particularly liked where you defended a federal flat tax. Huzzah, Johnny!

Insert your Rovian Talking Points here ----> ____<-----




 

heyheybooboo

Diamond Member
Jun 29, 2007
6,278
0
0
Dang. I forgot to taunt you on the Medicre Prescription Benefit & Big Pharma Give-A-Way brought to us by Dubya!
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Originally posted by: Mxylplyx

What do you think?

So, this was inspired by the other thread about *grand infrastructure projects* for national pride.

I really don't get it. For *national pride*, no building etc is ever gonna inspire that in me. Things should only be invested in or built if their is a demonstrable need.

And I believe you people are overlooking the many large projects like sports stadiums etc that are being built all the time. Some Americans already have a project of enormous proportions in the works now. I forget the name, but it is literally a huge movable island. It will circle the globe as it is navagatable. It's so large it's expected to suck up much of the global supply of building materials.

Otherwise, I prefer we invest in cleaning up our lakes & rivers instead of some huge useless white elephant of a project that mostly serves as a terrorist target.

Fern
 

Mxylplyx

Diamond Member
Mar 21, 2007
4,197
101
106
Originally posted by: loki8481
Originally posted by: Mxylplyx
The bridge to nowhere argument doesnt hold up, because I proposed a voting system where the general population votes on these projects, not politicians trying to funnel money to their business buddies.

oh god... do you really want 50 billion a year spent building statues of paris hilton and american idol contestants?

You would have to be of voting age to register a vote.
 

imported_Shivetya

Platinum Member
Jul 7, 2005
2,978
1
0
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: Shivetya
Originally posted by: Mxylplyx
I think they could easily take this out of the military budget by scaling back a few dozen pointless deployments around the world.

What do you think?

Two, why not take it from Entitlement programs which have NO BASIS in the Constitution? At least the military is SUPPOSED to be there.

Stupid, ignorant, and well, just stupid

Yup. I guess you are talking about things like the Social Security Trust Fund (running a surplus) which has been robbed of nearly $3 trillion to pay for your supply-side tax cuts and Bush War.


Go cry me a river. Democrats are the ones foisting that lie about a "trust fund". There ARE NO TRUST FUNDS. Its just a fancy name to pass off to the ignorant to hide spending and taxes.

Only a fool believes they exist. Only a fool would blame Bush for using imaginary money.

Get real. Its always and always has been Congress that is the problem. They are aristocrats of the modern age. Presidents are figureheads.... its Congress that the real power resides.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
HeyHeybooboo? you are attempting to play games with the figures. We will spend $961 billion in FY 2008 on the programs that I have detailed. You cannot deny that fact.

Now if you want to dig up how much of Medicare and Medicaid spending is offset by insurance premiums and SS taxes then go for it.

But trying to adjust figures by claiming current spending has not kept up with increased cost in healthcare huh? We are not talking about inflation based spending, we are talking about dollars coming out of the state and federal budgets and being spent on social programs.

And what the hell does Federal Debt have to do with this topic? We are talking about spending. Go play your trust fund games on another thread. Bush and congress (both Republican and Democrat) are playing by the rules that were already there. They did not change the rules in order to make the deficit look smaller by applying SS taxes to it, that rule has been in place for years.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,864
31,359
146
Originally posted by: ProfJohn

Also? why take the money out of our defense budget? Why not take it from the $1 trillion we spend per year on social programs?

figures :roll:
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,864
31,359
146
Originally posted by: Mxylplyx
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Could you give us an idea of the types of projects you want to build.

And please explain how building the tallest building in the world in NY is going to help those of us living in Florida.

Now a high speed rail line along DC/Boston corridor might make sense, but that is about the only place in the country where there would be enough traffic to make it work.

As someone else already pointed out the rest of your ?grand? projects end up looking more like pork than anything else. I can imagine congress fighting over who gets what.

Also? why take the money out of our defense budget? Why not take it from the $1 trillion we spend per year on social programs?

Tallest building in the world.
Most advanced airport in the world
Most advanced seaport in the world
Highest capacity wind turbine farm in the world.

Anything with the words "Biggest", "Best", "Most Advanced", and "In the World".



ps. If you read my posts around here, you'd know that I'm certainly not a liberal. I'm a proud American that wants something to be proud of again. Seems whenever one wants to read about Americas great accomplishments, they have to get out the history books.


Oo Oo, me first!

ready?

---Escalator to Nowhere! -- :cool:

seriously, though. I actually think this is a pretty good idea. Lacking in detail and feesibility at the moment, but I know what you're getting at. I think a good way to start would be going with the tallest building idea, btu instead of being simply a tall-ass building, make it a self-sustained biotechnical energy and waste efficient boon.

that's something to be proud of.

We have the technology, and some of these are being built as we speak...but let's build the biggest damn one!
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,864
31,359
146
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Aren?t we already building the tallest building in the world in form of the freedom tower? Or has it already been passed up?

The one in Dubai has already surpassed Taipei 101...and they've got about 1k more feet to go before they finish it.

Also, if the Calatrava (Fordham Spire) is approved for Chicago, I believe it is to be taller than the Freedom Tower.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,864
31,359
146
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: heyheybooboo
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
As a country we ?give? away as much as a $1 trillion per year to certain groups via ?social spending.? I am not even counting Social Security because we buy into that in theory.
You have told this lie repeatedly without fact. You have been refuted with links to the White House Budget Documents. You have misrepresented the Federal deficit without acknowledging the total annual Federal Debt which exceeds this annual deficit figure by nealy 200%. You have refused to acknowledge that we now pay more than $400 billion a year to service this debt.

My friend, you have no clothes. You have been exposed. Your manipulation and fear will no longer work.
Some facts for you...

link 3
Pell Grants: money given to poor people without need of pay back $13 billion in FY 2008

let me pick one of your facts, or at least your opinion of this fact, and blow it up in front of you.

"Pell grants = money given to poor people?" Are you seriously this deluded?

I'm not a poor person. Never have been. I received Pell grants for 3 of my years in undergrad. This is not "money given to poor people." It's federal aid to provide an education for our students. Don't even think that that money isn't given back. The point is that my education grant me a degree that allows me to be competitive and contribute.

What is this spilling from your mouth? I didn't know they stack shit that high.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Originally posted by: zinfamous
let me pick one of your facts, or at least your opinion of this fact, and blow it up in front of you.

"Pell grants = money given to poor people?" Are you seriously this deluded?

I'm not a poor person. Never have been. I received Pell grants for 3 of my years in undergrad. This is not "money given to poor people." It's federal aid to provide an education for our students. Don't even think that that money isn't given back. The point is that my education grant me a degree that allows me to be competitive and contribute.
Did you have to repay the Pell Grant directly or did the government ?give? you money to spend on your education without any strings attached?

I believe that instead of ?giving? money away via Pell Grants they should ?loan? the money to poor students. Even if the loans are interest free. At least then the people will pay them back and the government will be able to help more people.

Finally? what is with the last line of your post? Why the personal attack? Are you incapable of discussing this issue without insulting those you don?t agree with? Perhaps a better forum for you would be the playground and your local elementary school.
 

heartsurgeon

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2001
4,260
0
0
Wouldnt it be great if every fiscal year, our government set aside 50 billion or so to fund grand infrastructure projects that could be chosen by the people? Yearly committes could be formed that consists of city leaders, artists, architects, and even regular citizens, who would come up with various ideas that could be presented to the people, and the people could vote on which one(s) they want to see funded. These would be projects that make the whole country stand back and go "Wow", and just well up with pride that such a thing was built here in America. This would allow us to cast aside practicality and budget concerns every once in a while, and do something just so we could feel good about it and be proud to be Americans. Kind of like going to the moon, which didnt have much practical purpose at the time.

i'm gonna make a wild guess that you don't pay taxes, and your either in high school or college.

i particularly enjoyed the "even regular citizens" comment.

I vote for a wall along the Mexico-U.S. border. I am darn sure everyone would go "WOW", and a significant number of folks would feel good about it, and proud to be Americans. That wall will even have a practical effect....

Here in lies the naivety of your proposal...such a grand infrastructure project, as I have proposed above, could actually get approved. A significant number of "regular citizens" are appalled by the state of our southern border. Indeed, walls are already being built....
one man's grand infrastructure project, is another man's abomination....

pie in the sky utopianism..a construct of the liberal/elite/leftists
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: zinfamous
let me pick one of your facts, or at least your opinion of this fact, and blow it up in front of you.

"Pell grants = money given to poor people?" Are you seriously this deluded?

I'm not a poor person. Never have been. I received Pell grants for 3 of my years in undergrad. This is not "money given to poor people." It's federal aid to provide an education for our students. Don't even think that that money isn't given back. The point is that my education grant me a degree that allows me to be competitive and contribute.
Did you have to repay the Pell Grant directly or did the government ?give? you money to spend on your education without any strings attached?

I believe that instead of ?giving? money away via Pell Grants they should ?loan? the money to poor students. Even if the loans are interest free. At least then the people will pay them back and the government will be able to help more people.

Finally? what is with the last line of your post? Why the personal attack? Are you incapable of discussing this issue without insulting those you don?t agree with? Perhaps a better forum for you would be the playground and your local elementary school.

Your a "Professor" and you don't klnow how Pell grants work??? ROFLMAO!!