pcgeek11
Lifer
- Jun 12, 2005
- 22,385
- 5,000
- 136
Well to be fair, she isn't a vet. Unless she works on some German Shepards.
And yea is 2nd LC even a real Navy rank?
No it isn't
Ltjg
Lt.
Lt Commander
Commander
... No such thing as a 2nd Lt Cmdr.
Well to be fair, she isn't a vet. Unless she works on some German Shepards.
And yea is 2nd LC even a real Navy rank?
I would have asked him for his military background. You could have turned the whole thing around on his dumb ass.
Also, what the fuck is with all of those other people agreeing with him? Are you from some bumfuck southern town? I wouldn't expect those people to value a role that relies on intelligence instead of brute force.
Umm, no. Wrong.
No it wouldn't:
Navy Seals
Navy Corpsmen ( They are the Marine Corps Medics )
Navy PBRs
Navy Pilots
the list goes on and on....
I like the following definition, which was once penned by an unknown author:
A veteran is someone who, at one point in his/her life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America," for an amount of "up to and including my life."
by that fucked up stupid logic millions of others would not get the title "vet". since they were cooks, onboad ships, mechanics etc.
you serve in a warzone in a time of war you are a vet.
by that fucked up stupid logic millions of others would not get the title "vet". since they were cooks, onboad ships, mechanics etc.
you serve in a warzone in a time of war you are a vet. I don't give a shit if you have a gun or a scalpel.
Veteran
Military veterans, i.e., a person who has served or is serving in the armed forces, and has direct exposure to acts of military conflict, commonly known as war veterans (although not all military conflicts, or areas in which armed combat takes place, are necessarily referred to as "wars").
The most common usage is for former armed services personnel. A veteran is one who has served in the armed forces, especially one who has served in combat. It is especially applied to those who served for an entire career, usually of 20 years or more, but may be applied for someone who has only served one tour of duty.
A common misconception is that only those who have served in combat or those who have retired from active duty can be called military veterans.
-----------------------
vet·er·an
   [vet-er-uhn, ve-truh
n]![]()
![]()
noun 1. a person who has had long service or experience in an occupation, office, or the like: a veteran of the police force; a veteran of many sports competitions.
2. a person who has served in a military force, especially one who has fought in a war: a Vietnam veteran.
Veteran
Military veterans, i.e., a person who has served or is serving in the armed forces, and has direct exposure to acts of military conflict, commonly known as war veterans (although not all military conflicts, or areas in which armed combat takes place, are necessarily referred to as "wars").
The most common usage is for former armed services personnel. A veteran is one who has served in the armed forces, especially one who has served in combat. It is especially applied to those who served for an entire career, usually of 20 years or more, but may be applied for someone who has only served one tour of duty.
A common misconception is that only those who have served in combat or those who have retired from active duty can be called military veterans.
-----------------------
vet·er·an
   [vet-er-uhn, ve-truh
n]![]()
![]()
noun 1. a person who has had long service or experience in an occupation, office, or the like: a veteran of the police force; a veteran of many sports competitions.
2. a person who has served in a military force, especially one who has fought in a war: a Vietnam veteran.
Umm, no. Wrong.
Situation:
Out drinking with some friends and the bar was doing some stuff for Veterans and military. More or less just people who had family got discounts on food, free shots or pints, that sort of stuff. Before the karoke started, they had gone through some of the crowd to ask them who they knew that was a veteran that sort of thing. I answered my sister (who was not with us, as she is stationed on base in VA). They asked her rank, I replied she's an MD with a rank of 2nd Lt. Commander in the navy.
Apparently this sparked some random dude's scorn and opprobrium. He came up to me and my pals saying that she is not a vet nor should ever be considered one since she never sees combat, nor would she as a medical doctor. My response was that regardless of whether or not she carries a gun (which they give a choice and she opted not to with the hippocratic oath and all), saw any war time, she is serving her country and when she exits the military she is and should be considered a veteran. She also sees and patches up the guys who are blown up from IEDs while in the hot zones. Her particular speciality is Gastroenterology, since so many of the guys now have problems from not just the stress and food, but also actual trauma caused by driving over IEDs and having half of your digestive tract blow off. She has been deloyed to Gitmo, Afganistan, and Iraq, totaling 5 times, and in fact just returned from a 9 month stint in Germany at the rehab base.
His response was still that since she never gets fired at or fires a gun, it discludes her from the title "vet". What is worse, a bunch of random people in the bar also agree with his stance, though not so strongly and loudly. Many people side with me, it starts to get ugly, bar kicks me and my pals out, the other dude and his pals, then calls the cops. we were driving off as cops were showing up.
I couldn't beleive so many people thought you have to be in combat to be a vet and that a medical doctor in the service isn't as "brave or honorable" way to serve your country as combat postions.
In any case, I am home now at 8 pm, and think I will just call it a night and count my blessings dude didn't hit me in the head over this. Thanks for letting me vent ATOT.
I suspect the guy isn't a 'real' vet himself. Only an asshole who hasn't seen combat would disrepect a medic of any stripe.
Everyone who serves is a veteran.
I've always believed that there should be 2 categories of "Veteran" with different benefits.
Veteran. One who served in the military but never in a combat theater.
Combat Veteran. One who served in a combat theater.
I knew many guys who served in the US Army during the Vietnam War, yet spent their time in Germany or one of the other European countries. They get the same benefits as one of the grunts who fought in Vietnam.
Each class should get the same basic benefits...VA loans, GI Bill, etc., but the combat vets should get a bit more...they put their lives on the line daily.
Maybe extra credit for those who hire them, lower interest rate on VA loans, etc.
