There really should be a way to reduce the impact of such traders, if only by reducing their leverage, without losing the positive impact of futures trading. Though I'm not really sure if oil futures trading is even necessary anymore from the suppliers' perspective, though it's probably quite profitable. I can still see the hedge value for really large consumers, but I'm sure they'd love to have all the people looking to make money shut out of the market. If the buyer had to have at least the ability to take physical possession of the oil and the liquidity to purchase it, would that significantly reduce oil prices while leaving adequate liquidity? Or is the entire speculator debate pretty much a red herring?
From $3.34 to $3.55 to $3.75 over the last week here. Whooopeeeee!
To Whippershapper, I think it will eventually crush the economy if it continues to climb, especially near $5.00 per gallon.
Listening on radio on way to work they were talking about ~$10 gas coming here to Chicago.
I look forward to the empty Tollways.
That's only going to happen in Oct.- early Nov. Then prices will quickly go down.
Do you see any practical way to reduce the price pressure exerted by speculators? More to the point, do you think that speculators actually are exerting significant price pressure, or are they merely a convenient target for political purposes? (Obviously I'm bashing them too, but perhaps incorrectly out of ignorance. LOL)Taking physical delivery wouldn't change much. You can get a fairly good approximation of the positions of traders from the CFTC reports on finviz. http://finviz.com/futures_charts.ashx?t=CL
It's the SWAP/Prepaid Forwards/Forwards/etc market that is hard to track. For every seller of a commodity contract, there has to be a buyer and vice versa.
Like I said, there are too many funds that are long-biased (pensions, hedges, etf's/etn's, managed futures trend following, etc) that probably shouldn't be participating in oil markets to begin with. If they are to participate they purchase another form of oil price derivative. Getting rid of the larger speculators (banks) may increase or decrease the price of oil (I'm not sure it's cut and dry) it would however increase the volatility of prices (swings would be exacerbated) as there would be a lack of hedging.
Again, there simply aren't enough back to back hedgers, as there are naturally more sellers that want to remain hedged compared to buyers that aren't as sensitive to cost. Gas stations can easily pass cost through. Airlines can not, etc.
Do you see any practical way to reduce the price pressure exerted by speculators? More to the point, do you think that speculators actually are exerting significant price pressure, or are they merely a convenient target for political purposes? (Obviously I'm bashing them too, but perhaps incorrectly out of ignorance. LOL)
It's going to happen Dave. I think you may finally get to the mythical $5 national average.
Originally Posted by dmcowen674![]()
Listening on radio on way to work they were talking about ~$10 gas coming here to Chicago.
I look forward to the empty Tollways.
I know its so the Republicans can use the excuse of high gas prices to unseat Obama.
Obama knows this and going on the offense against such lies by Republicans:
2-23-2012
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/analysis-obama-goes-offense-over-high-gasoline-prices-060444869.html
Obama goes on offense over high gasoline prices
As Republican presidential candidates toss barbs at Barack Obama over expensive gasoline, the U.S. president and his team are going on the offensive with a strategy to divert blame and prepare voters for higher costs.
His strategy is both politically- and policy-oriented. The president wants to advance his plans to increase renewable energy sources and reduce U.S. reliance on foreign oil.
But he also needs to win the war of words to gain an upper hand over Republicans in Western battleground states such as Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico, where people drive a lot and feel the sting of rising prices acutely.
Politically, Obama's vulnerability over gasoline prices could be especially deadly in Western states that he needs to win to remain in the White House.
"If someone comes back at him and says, 'What's your policy Mr. Santorum, Mr. Gingrich, or whomever, to lower gasoline prices today,' I don't think they'll have a good answer."
That's not Obama defending himself, it's Yahoo news and AP that's defending him.
That's not Obama defending himself, it's Yahoo news and AP that's defending him.
Gas is running around $5 in Los Angeles and getting close to $6 in Orlando.
I know that $5 that the rabids in here said would never happen.
They are going to faint.
Are we cranking out the 'librul media' myth again?
Did you RTWFA?
Clearly states:
Rising gasoline costs have brought the issue to the forefront of the presidential campaign.
So Obama has started to pepper his speeches with references to prices at the pump.
I know that $5 that the rabids in here said would never happen.
They are going to faint.
I know that $5 that the rabids in here said would never happen.
They are going to faint.
There are a couple of stations in Orlando on Semoron Blvd on the way into the airport that prey on tourists who are either:
a. Deperate to fill up their rental cars and not miss their flights
b. Not paying attention (the prices aren't advertised on any signage)
These stations have been doing this for years. Saying gas is "getting close to $6 in Orlando" is disingenuous. It's around $3.60 for regular unleaded.
EDIT: Link to local news story from 2010, citing these stations with gas ~$5/gallon:
http://www.myfoxorlando.com/dpp/money/051810-gas-prices