Got an anti-Bush bumper sticker? Prepare to be arrested

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: MoFunk
I have been thinking about this for a bit and have a question. How many of you who find nothing at all wrong with the F word being publically displayed suport taking the word God out of the pledge because it may be offensive to someone?

Good point...but be sure to differentiate between 'offensive to someone' and 'violation of the constitution with the possibility of further government decay' when you talk about reasons.

I don't believe in the current pledge, but not because it's offensive (although it is that too).



Last I checked it was freedom OF religion not freedom FROM religion.

Oh, and for what it's worth I agree with what you say above. I don't think the government has the right to tell kids they can't pray in school, or that someone can't hold a chruch service in a park, or any other free expression of any religion. I just don't want the government participating, or my tax dollars (not that I really pay any anyway) contributing. As long as it's all purely the people and never the government, I'm all for it.
 

ciba

Senior member
Apr 27, 2004
812
0
71
Originally posted by: conjur
Uhh...US Constitution 1st Amendment decision trumps state law.

While I agree with you, conjur, I don't think it is right to vilify a police officer for not knowing every court decision in the history of man.
 

MoFunk

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2000
4,058
0
0
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: MoFunk
I have been thinking about this for a bit and have a question. How many of you who find nothing at all wrong with the F word being publically displayed suport taking the word God out of the pledge because it may be offensive to someone?

Good point...but be sure to differentiate between 'offensive to someone' and 'violation of the constitution with the possibility of further government decay' when you talk about reasons.

I don't believe in the current pledge, but not because it's offensive (although it is that too).



Last I checked it was freedom OF religion not freedom FROM religion.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion

You may be able to argue that the pledge isn't a law, but it's ABSOLUTELY AND TOTALLY opposed to the original intent of the founders. If they'd wanted god in government they could easily have put him there...but you'll not find one reference, not in the constituion, not in our original money, nor in our original pledge. You'll find written records of them arguing against the government in any way involving itself in religious affairs, including inclusion of religious idolotry or writing in it's official documents. It was considered, and refused.

They expected religious men to hold office, but they did NOT want religion within the federal structure of the government itself. I have yet to ever see this effectively argued by any credible source.


This is an arguement unto itself, but man our government is FILLED with Christianity. Have you seen Washington DC? Most buildings have Christian symbolism. Have you ever been a witness in court, tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help me GOD, with your hand on a bible. Most of our founding fathers were Christian and spoke of God and christianity often.

But this is way off topic. This is about the morality of this country wasting away to nothing. Look I talk to my kids nightly about everything. I teach them right from wrong. I teach them morals and values. But it is a total lack of respect and lack of decency that people show stuff like this.

This is all of coarse my own opinion, I just seem to expect more out of mankind then is actually there!
 

MoFunk

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2000
4,058
0
0
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: MoFunk
I have been thinking about this for a bit and have a question. How many of you who find nothing at all wrong with the F word being publically displayed suport taking the word God out of the pledge because it may be offensive to someone?

Good point...but be sure to differentiate between 'offensive to someone' and 'violation of the constitution with the possibility of further government decay' when you talk about reasons.

I don't believe in the current pledge, but not because it's offensive (although it is that too).



Last I checked it was freedom OF religion not freedom FROM religion.

Oh, and for what it's worth I agree with what you say above. I don't think the government has the right to tell kids they can't pray in school, or that someone can't hold a chruch service in a park, or any other free expression of any religion. I just don't want the government participating, or my tax dollars (not that I really pay any anyway) contributing. As long as it's all purely the people and never the government, I'm all for it.


Man I totally appreciate having a difference of opinion with someone and being able to civily discuss it without name calling and anger, this is how this area SHOULD be but often is not.
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
I'm 100% for free speech. This person should be able to have the bumper sticker on the back of the car. However, I certainly wouldn't say the cop deserves to be fired or even reprimanded. Retrained on what is an arrestable offense, sure, but not fired.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: MoFunk
I have been thinking about this for a bit and have a question. How many of you who find nothing at all wrong with the F word being publically displayed suport taking the word God out of the pledge because it may be offensive to someone?

Good point...but be sure to differentiate between 'offensive to someone' and 'violation of the constitution with the possibility of further government decay' when you talk about reasons.

I don't believe in the current pledge, but not because it's offensive (although it is that too).



Last I checked it was freedom OF religion not freedom FROM religion.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion

You may be able to argue that the pledge isn't a law, but it's ABSOLUTELY AND TOTALLY opposed to the original intent of the founders. If they'd wanted god in government they could easily have put him there...but you'll not find one reference, not in the constituion, not in our original money, nor in our original pledge. You'll find written records of them arguing against the government in any way involving itself in religious affairs, including inclusion of religious idolotry or writing in it's official documents. It was considered, and refused.

They expected religious men to hold office, but they did NOT want religion within the federal structure of the government itself. I have yet to ever see this effectively argued by any credible source.


This is an arguement unto itself, but man our government is FILLED with Christianity. Have you seen Washington DC? Most buildings have Christian symbolism. Have you ever been a witness in court, tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help me GOD, with your hand on a bible. Most of our founding fathers were Christian and spoke of God and christianity often.

But this is way off topic. This is about the morality of this country wasting away to nothing. Look I talk to my kids nightly about everything. I teach them right from wrong. I teach them morals and values. But it is a total lack of respect and lack of decency that people show stuff like this.

This is all of coarse my own opinion, I just seem to expect more out of mankind then is actually there!

You actually don't have to say, 'so help me god', nor are you required to place your hand on a bible. I'm talking about federal btw, states often came up with very theocratic constitutions (such as you orginally had to be a CHRISTIAN (not just religious) to vote, or be a juror, or hold elected office etc). But those things were all at the state level, not federal, and have long since been done away with (except for the requirement to be religious to hold office). Anyway, you cannot be required to participate in any religious observance. Instead of the whole bible thing or so help me god thing you are always allowed to say 'I so affirm'. That's how I took the oath of enlistment to the military, and how I've testified.

That ALL came about in two waves, the first during and after the civil war in an effort for re-unification and the second was during mccartheism and the work to oppose 'godless communism'. In both cases the changes were railroaded by religious organizations (like the koc) in league with certain prominent politicians and businessmen (pretty much the old give and take, we'll get our congregation to back you in the next election if you convince the businesses to give money to support these changes). If you read all the original writings it wasn't that way at all. If you're talking raw percentages, yes, most of the founders were of some christian denomination. However you should clarify that a bit, because in the last 60 years fundamentalists have tried to imply that most means 90% or something and christian means purely catholic or mainstream protestant, and that's patently untrue. A large number of our founders were deists, and many were from non-mainstream religious branches (like quakers).

What I've found in my quest for spiritual fulfillment and plain truth is that both sides (liberal and conservative, christian and atheist) have stooped to some pretty dirty politicking to get their way imposed on others. Neither are fully true, neither are fully false. Sadly, I think it's grown MUCH worse in the last 4 years and I believe it's going to get far far worse yet...possibly bad enough to bring real damage to the country. Like I said before, I want everyone to be able to practice their religion freely, but I'll execute every man and woman in the country or die trying before I'll live under a theocracy or see the intent of the founders flushed away out of prideful religious zealotry.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: sierrita
Originally posted by: MoFunk
It's really cool when we are behind a car in traffic and my 5 year old says F... U...C...K..... Fvck? Daddy what does fvck mean? Or when I walk down the street with her and a car rolls by bumping "yo mutha fvckin ho I gonna beat yo ass." I just love that. I feel that if you have the "right" to force crap at my kids that I feel is wrong, then I should have the right to ram my boot in your ass!

"Daddy, what does assault and battery mean?"



:thumbsup:



It is an artistic expression of my anger towards another person and should be looked upon with tolerance.
Well at least in theory. Of course we suspect that's just the E Thug in you speaking.


You are correct, I was after all once a liberal.
So now that you are a Conservative you feel perfectly fine talking about beating somebodies ass because you don't like what their Bumper Sticker says?
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: ciba
Originally posted by: conjur
Uhh...US Constitution 1st Amendment decision trumps state law.
While I agree with you, conjur, I don't think it is right to vilify a police officer for not knowing every court decision in the history of man.
Oh, I was thinking more along the lines of common sense.
 

MoFunk

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2000
4,058
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: sierrita
Originally posted by: MoFunk
It's really cool when we are behind a car in traffic and my 5 year old says F... U...C...K..... Fvck? Daddy what does fvck mean? Or when I walk down the street with her and a car rolls by bumping "yo mutha fvckin ho I gonna beat yo ass." I just love that. I feel that if you have the "right" to force crap at my kids that I feel is wrong, then I should have the right to ram my boot in your ass!

"Daddy, what does assault and battery mean?"



:thumbsup:



It is an artistic expression of my anger towards another person and should be looked upon with tolerance.
Well at least in theory. Of course we suspect that's just the E Thug in you speaking.


You are correct, I was after all once a liberal.
So now that you are a Conservative you feel perfectly fine talking about beating somebodies ass because you don't like what their Bumper Sticker says?


I do lean more conservative, but do not hold true conservative views. And I am not going to walk up to someone and assult them just because I do not like their bumper sticker, it is more of my thought of anger over the way I have to shield my kids every day from this crap. Gone are the days of moral clearity and gone are the days of respect for those around you. I guess I just need to lib up a little and see nothing wrong in this crap. I am going to start next week, I am going to post an advertisement for my business and I am going to have a sale, maybe I will call it.... "MY BIG FVCKING SALE". I could also open a porn shop and have a sign that says "FVCK TOYS HERE". I mean that kind of language is perfectly fine and protected as free speach right? I like the way this is going, I feel, well LIBERATED. Maybe a shirt can be made for my friends that voted for sKerry "I TRIED TO FVCK BUSH" or a shirt that I can wear to the mall that simply says "FVCK YOU".
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Hecubus2000
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Hecubus2000
That cop did the right thing. Last time I checked it was against the law to profanity in public. This has nothing to do with politics. The woman was breaking the law and got a warning. That cop would have done the same thing if the stupid woman's bumper sticker said F_ _ _ Kerry.

Uhh...what part of this bolded part did you miss?


"The Supreme Court considered a case about 30-some years ago where a person was prosecuted for wearing a jacket that said, 'F--- the draft,' on the back. The Supreme Court said states could not prohibit people from wearing such a jacket," he said. "They said, 'One man's profanity is another man's lyric.' "

Uhhhh....... In the state of Colorado it is against the law to profanity in public. Look it up.

Uhh...US Constitution 1st Amendment decision trumps state law.

:laugh:
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: sierrita
Originally posted by: MoFunk
It's really cool when we are behind a car in traffic and my 5 year old says F... U...C...K..... Fvck? Daddy what does fvck mean? Or when I walk down the street with her and a car rolls by bumping "yo mutha fvckin ho I gonna beat yo ass." I just love that. I feel that if you have the "right" to force crap at my kids that I feel is wrong, then I should have the right to ram my boot in your ass!

"Daddy, what does assault and battery mean?"



:thumbsup:



It is an artistic expression of my anger towards another person and should be looked upon with tolerance.
Well at least in theory. Of course we suspect that's just the E Thug in you speaking.


You are correct, I was after all once a liberal.
So now that you are a Conservative you feel perfectly fine talking about beating somebodies ass because you don't like what their Bumper Sticker says?


I do lean more conservative, but do not hold true conservative views. And I am not going to walk up to someone and assult them just because I do not like their bumper sticker, it is more of my thought of anger over the way I have to shield my kids every day from this crap. Gone are the days of moral clearity and gone are the days of respect for those around you. I guess I just need to lib up a little and see nothing wrong in this crap. I am going to start next week, I am going to post an advertisement for my business and I am going to have a sale, maybe I will call it.... "MY BIG FVCKING SALE". I could also open a porn shop and have a sign that says "FVCK TOYS HERE". I mean that kind of language is perfectly fine and protected as free speach right? I like the way this is going, I feel, well LIBERATED. Maybe a shirt can be made for my friends that voted for sKerry "I TRIED TO FVCK BUSH" or a shirt that I can wear to the mall that simply says "FVCK YOU".
Then you, like the person with the FVCK BUSH Bumper sticker, will be seen as an idiot. Of course talking about shoving your boot up someones arse on the Internent is a good start.
 

ITJunkie

Platinum Member
Apr 17, 2003
2,512
0
76
www.techange.com
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Haha - how interesting:p I saw a POS gas guzzling bronco(full size) today that had a brand new "Fvck Bush" sticker on it. I chuckled. I mean, go ahead and throw your public tantrum via a bumper sticker if you wish - it's not like it's going to change anything. Infact I'd say more moderate folk might even get turned off the rabid left's antics.

<- can't wait for the next election cycle :laugh:

BTW - you can't swear in public in alot of places, heck you can't swear on TV. I really don't care if people put that on their vehicles, and I don't think it should be against the law to do so - but I think people should have the decency to choose more appropriate types of displays.

CsG

This I agree with (see bold). I would only add that the same holds true for the rabid right's antics as well.
 

MoFunk

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2000
4,058
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: sierrita
Originally posted by: MoFunk
It's really cool when we are behind a car in traffic and my 5 year old says F... U...C...K..... Fvck? Daddy what does fvck mean? Or when I walk down the street with her and a car rolls by bumping "yo mutha fvckin ho I gonna beat yo ass." I just love that. I feel that if you have the "right" to force crap at my kids that I feel is wrong, then I should have the right to ram my boot in your ass!

"Daddy, what does assault and battery mean?"



:thumbsup:



It is an artistic expression of my anger towards another person and should be looked upon with tolerance.
Well at least in theory. Of course we suspect that's just the E Thug in you speaking.


You are correct, I was after all once a liberal.
So now that you are a Conservative you feel perfectly fine talking about beating somebodies ass because you don't like what their Bumper Sticker says?


I do lean more conservative, but do not hold true conservative views. And I am not going to walk up to someone and assult them just because I do not like their bumper sticker, it is more of my thought of anger over the way I have to shield my kids every day from this crap. Gone are the days of moral clearity and gone are the days of respect for those around you. I guess I just need to lib up a little and see nothing wrong in this crap. I am going to start next week, I am going to post an advertisement for my business and I am going to have a sale, maybe I will call it.... "MY BIG FVCKING SALE". I could also open a porn shop and have a sign that says "FVCK TOYS HERE". I mean that kind of language is perfectly fine and protected as free speach right? I like the way this is going, I feel, well LIBERATED. Maybe a shirt can be made for my friends that voted for sKerry "I TRIED TO FVCK BUSH" or a shirt that I can wear to the mall that simply says "FVCK YOU".
Then you, like the person with the FVCK BUSH Bumper sticker, will be seen as an idiot. Of course talking about shoving your boot up someones arse on the Internent is a good start.


No, just a person with a right to free speach.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: MoFunk
I do lean more conservative, but do not hold true conservative views. And I am not going to walk up to someone and assult them just because I do not like their bumper sticker, it is more of my thought of anger over the way I have to shield my kids every day from this crap. Gone are the days of moral clearity and gone are the days of respect for those around you. I guess I just need to lib up a little and see nothing wrong in this crap. I am going to start next week, I am going to post an advertisement for my business and I am going to have a sale, maybe I will call it.... "MY BIG FVCKING SALE". I could also open a porn shop and have a sign that says "FVCK TOYS HERE". I mean that kind of language is perfectly fine and protected as free speach right? I like the way this is going, I feel, well LIBERATED. Maybe a shirt can be made for my friends that voted for sKerry "I TRIED TO FVCK BUSH" or a shirt that I can wear to the mall that simply says "FVCK YOU".
Then you, like the person with the FVCK BUSH Bumper sticker, will be seen as an idiot. Of course talking about shoving your boot up someones arse on the Internent is a good start.


No, just a person with a right to free speach.
Or a person using his right to free speech to gome across as an idiot;) JK

I think this is just a case of you expressing your frustration over the situation and I really don't believe you are an idiot.
 

MoFunk

Diamond Member
Dec 6, 2000
4,058
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: MoFunk
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: MoFunk
I do lean more conservative, but do not hold true conservative views. And I am not going to walk up to someone and assult them just because I do not like their bumper sticker, it is more of my thought of anger over the way I have to shield my kids every day from this crap. Gone are the days of moral clearity and gone are the days of respect for those around you. I guess I just need to lib up a little and see nothing wrong in this crap. I am going to start next week, I am going to post an advertisement for my business and I am going to have a sale, maybe I will call it.... "MY BIG FVCKING SALE". I could also open a porn shop and have a sign that says "FVCK TOYS HERE". I mean that kind of language is perfectly fine and protected as free speach right? I like the way this is going, I feel, well LIBERATED. Maybe a shirt can be made for my friends that voted for sKerry "I TRIED TO FVCK BUSH" or a shirt that I can wear to the mall that simply says "FVCK YOU".
Then you, like the person with the FVCK BUSH Bumper sticker, will be seen as an idiot. Of course talking about shoving your boot up someones arse on the Internent is a good start.


No, just a person with a right to free speach.
Or a person using his right to free speech to gome across as an idiot;) JK

I think this is just a case of you expressing your frustration over the situation and I really don't believe you are an idiot.


I understand, I would never do any of that and you are right, I am frustrated. I have 2 daughters one of them 5. I have to continually explain to her why the little guy is peeing on something and stuff like that. I will always defend free speach, but I feel that there is a line that should not be crossed. It is also about respect, which people seem to lack these days.