Got an anti-Bush bumper sticker? Prepare to be arrested

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: KK
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: jpeyton
What a sad world we live in, to place the blame of fvcked up kids on some bad language on a bumper sticker.

Blame your own damn self.

Sorry, but if you as a parent do you job, then nothing...not teasing or taunting, not violent video games, not explicit lyrics, not movie/TV violence...NOTHING will screw up your kids.

Humans have the ability to absorb a great deal of experiences and not be affected at their core. If you think a bumper sticker is going to ruin America, I suggest you open up your eyes.
:thumbsup:

Another great parent here. And I know you have kids, hopefully you're exwife has some common sense to rub off on these kids and that she has custody.

Attitudes like yours show the utter worthlessness of the neoconservative attitude, that you think you have the RIGHT to dictate to all around you based on your limited and naive experiences. You DO NOT. Your ignorant, narrow-minded pitiful hurtful statements wishing custody decisions without FULL 100% knowledge of EXACTLY what the situation is, in my view, makes you a prime candidate to have your a$$ completely kicked up one side and down the other. You interfere in my life like that and you can bet you butt you'll meet the business end of my 27 years of combat experience.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: KK
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: KK
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: KK
And what happens when your kid goes to school and starts cussing in front of the teachers? You probably just brush it off as the kids being kids. :thumbsup:
Wow...you sure didn't need a push to slide down that slippery slope logic, did you?
Ain't no slope to it. You ever been in a public school?
Yes, I have. And my daughters have been in public schools since Kindergarten. I hear the white trash kids and the inner-city kids and their constant spewing of profanity. I don't think I've ever heard my daughter use a "four-letter word". Seriously.

She also doesn't drink, doesn't smoke, doesn't do drugs, and isn't sexually active.


Not too bad for a 17 year-old in a public school raised by an atheist father, eh?

You must have shown some restraint on using profanity around them when they were little. The white trash kids, you think the trash parents showed the same restraint. More than likely not. As the kids get older, they understand what is right or wrong based mostly upon what they were raised around.

True only to a very minor degree. People are NOT the product of their environment. They have basic dispositions established by genetics and personality and they are, at the core, independent thinkers capable of forming their OWN views and mannerisms. Racists don't always have racist children, republicans birth democrats with regularity, and so on. To say that every action a child takes is a direct result of specific or general parental influences is utterly ludicrous. Moreover, to suggest that swearing affects any activity or thought process beyond that of swearing, is likewise ignorant.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: conjur
As I said before, I don't use profanity consistently around them. I, like any normal person, will utter something when I, say, stub my stoe, drop something, break something, etc. I have always taught them respect and tolerance for people that respect others. I have taught them what bigotry is and they recognize it when they see it.

Putting a bumper sticker like F-ck Bush on my car will not offend them or affect them in any way. If someone else gets offended? GREAT!

Would you be offended if someone put a sticker on their car with saying "fvck liberals, traitors of America"?

Nope, not in the least. They're expressing an opinion, nothing more. I'll laugh at their stupidity of course, but that's all.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: conjur
As I said before, I don't use profanity consistently around them. I, like any normal person, will utter something when I, say, stub my stoe, drop something, break something, etc. I have always taught them respect and tolerance for people that respect others. I have taught them what bigotry is and they recognize it when they see it.

Putting a bumper sticker like F-ck Bush on my car will not offend them or affect them in any way. If someone else gets offended? GREAT!

Would you be offended if someone put a sticker on their car with saying "fvck liberals, traitors of America"?
I'd consider them a brainwashed moron. Esp. considering our country was founded by liberals and the de facto religion of this nation is based upon a liberal.

So George Washington was a liberal? Thomas Jefferson was a liberal? Andrew Jackson was a liberal?

You got a huge double standard. Some when people say "fvk liberals" you get offended, but you are willing to put a sticker on your car saying "fvk Bush". It goes both ways


Aboslutely they were...liberalism (by it's actual definition and original use in politics) is that which is progressive, or seeks change. If you go to war with your parent country, you're a liberal in spades. There is absolutely NO argument that the founders, the original republican party, and jesus were ANYTHING but hardcore total liberals. None.
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Who cares if it's legal. It's incredibly LAME. :p

How about "Sodomize Bush"?

I don't think it is lame, I think it's an efficient way of conveying one's general feelings of disdain and disgust re: Bush to the world.

Efficient? How about 14-year-oldish? :p

The only way it could be any better was if it said, "FVCK BUSH LOLOL!1!!!111!~~~ WTF"

Yes, efficient. By the way, I don't agree that cursing someone you dislike intensely is a thing only teenagers should do. It's for adults as well. :) This is a harmless way of releasing stress while expressing one's political outlook. I am all for this. "FVCK DUMBYA".

It certainly demonstrates the intellectual nature of the anti-Bush thinker.

I'd guess that almost 100% of so-called anti-Bush thinkers don't have this bumper sticker on their car. Therefore, I would say the bumper sticker demonstrates precisely fvck all about these people as a group.

Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Seriously, how do liberals expect to tide votes over to their side with public displays like this? Who wants to be associated with that? :p
[/quote]

The bumper sticker is a succinct and somewhat amusing expression of frustration and hostility at/ towards Dumbya.




 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
KK, I assume your kids are so poorly capable of handling cuss words that they'll blush if they see a "Fvck Bush" bumper sticker?

Again, this is nothing more than a parent trying to pass the blame onto someone else for their own actions. If your kids are going to pick up and use four-letter words off a bumper sticker, I'd hate to think what they're going to pick up and use in the thousands of public conversations they'll have in life.

I can't bring myself to even say "ass" in front of parents or family, and I rarely cuss in front of friends, but I'm not going to cover my ears if I hear a four letter word.

Simply shielding them from cuss words their entire lives is as effective as parents who try to sheild their children from sex education their entire lives...poorly adjusted children result.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Not consistently, no. They have seen R-rated movies,

I was'nt allowed to watch R rated movies until, well I was 17 just like the law says. My wife does'nt allow R rated movies in the house today period. So no, you're wrong, they don't "hear it everywhere anyway so its no biggie." It is a big deal to expose public to profanity against thier will. and driving on public street with profane massesages is aginst thier will. I have no problem with smut pedders behind closed doors, or strip clubs or even legal prostitution because all those activities can be done volutatry and with consent/ but driving a broad daylight with profane and/or nudity meesage is involutarly subjecting public to it.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Hyprocracy:

One day, seatbelt laws should be because it's not up to the goverment to protect us from ourselves...

The next, profanity on bumper stickers needs to be governement enforced removal to protect ourselves from ourselves....

I don't need a bumper sticker....Fvck Bush.
 

upsciLLion

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2001
5,947
1
81
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Who cares if it's legal. It's incredibly LAME. :p

How about "Sodomize Bush"?

I don't think it is lame, I think it's an efficient way of conveying one's general feelings of disdain and disgust re: Bush to the world.

Efficient? How about 14-year-oldish? :p

The only way it could be any better was if it said, "FVCK BUSH LOLOL!1!!!111!~~~ WTF"

Yes, efficient. By the way, I don't agree that cursing someone you dislike intensely is a thing only teenagers should do. It's for adults as well. :) This is a harmless way of releasing stress while expressing one's political outlook. I am all for this. "FVCK DUMBYA".

It certainly demonstrates the intellectual nature of the anti-Bush thinker.

I'd guess that almost 100% of so-called anti-Bush thinkers don't have this bumper sticker on their car. Therefore, I would say the bumper sticker demonstrates precisely fvck all about these people as a group.

Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Seriously, how do liberals expect to tide votes over to their side with public displays like this? Who wants to be associated with that? :p

The bumper sticker is a succinct and somewhat amusing expression of frustration and hostility at/ towards Dumbya.[/quote]

The voice of those that make the most noise often shape the stereotypical view of the individuals of that party, no?
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: Zebo
Not consistently, no. They have seen R-rated movies,

I was'nt allowed to watch R rated movies until, well I was 17 just like the law says. My wife does'nt allow R rated movies in the house today period. So no, you're wrong, they don't "hear it everywhere anyway so its no biggie." It is a big deal to expose public to profanity against thier will. and driving on public street with profane massesages is aginst thier will. I have no problem with smut pedders behind closed doors, or strip clubs or even legal prostitution because all those activities can be done volutatry and with consent/ but driving a broad daylight with profane and/or nudity meesage is involutarly subjecting public to it.

Tough sh1t. You cannot reasonably expect the rest of the world to "protect" you from everything YOU find offensive. The bumper sticker is legal. "Fvck Bush" is protected, political speech. Lol.
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Who cares if it's legal. It's incredibly LAME. :p

How about "Sodomize Bush"?

I don't think it is lame, I think it's an efficient way of conveying one's general feelings of disdain and disgust re: Bush to the world.

Efficient? How about 14-year-oldish? :p

The only way it could be any better was if it said, "FVCK BUSH LOLOL!1!!!111!~~~ WTF"

Yes, efficient. By the way, I don't agree that cursing someone you dislike intensely is a thing only teenagers should do. It's for adults as well. :) This is a harmless way of releasing stress while expressing one's political outlook. I am all for this. "FVCK DUMBYA".

It certainly demonstrates the intellectual nature of the anti-Bush thinker.

I'd guess that almost 100% of so-called anti-Bush thinkers don't have this bumper sticker on their car. Therefore, I would say the bumper sticker demonstrates precisely fvck all about these people as a group.

Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Seriously, how do liberals expect to tide votes over to their side with public displays like this? Who wants to be associated with that? :p

The bumper sticker is a succinct and somewhat amusing expression of frustration and hostility at/ towards Dumbya.

The voice of those that make the most noise often shape the stereotypical view of the individuals of that party, no?[/quote]

How is a having a "FVCK BUSH" bumper sticker on one's car "making a lot of noise"? This is a relatively quiet and mild form of protest, to my mind.

BTW I wouldn't necessarily agree that our stereotypical views of political parties are shaped by the noisiest individuals in those parties.

 

upsciLLion

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2001
5,947
1
81
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: upsciLLion

The voice of those that make the most noise often shape the stereotypical view of the individuals of that party, no?

How is a having a "FVCK BUSH" bumper sticker on one's car "making a lot of noise"? This is a relatively quiet and mild form of protest, to my mind.

BTW I wouldn't necessarily agree that our stereotypical views of political parties are shaped by the noisiest individuals in those parties.

Why did you answer my question with a question? ;)

It's ridiculous and sad. I don't have time to explain it any other way. I have an interest theory test I have to study for.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: Zebo
Not consistently, no. They have seen R-rated movies,

I was'nt allowed to watch R rated movies until, well I was 17 just like the law says. My wife does'nt allow R rated movies in the house today period. So no, you're wrong, they don't "hear it everywhere anyway so its no biggie." It is a big deal to expose public to profanity against thier will. and driving on public street with profane massesages is aginst thier will. I have no problem with smut pedders behind closed doors, or strip clubs or even legal prostitution because all those activities can be done volutatry and with consent/ but driving a broad daylight with profane and/or nudity meesage is involutarly subjecting public to it.

Wow, what color is the sky on your planet? Now, I grew up quite a while ago, before the proliferation of media exploitation we currently live in. There was no rap music, no cable...hell my first tv was black and white and had 13 channels. My parents didn't allow swearing in the house.

I knew EVERY swear word by kindergarden/1st grade. Every kid does, or at least 99% of them for the last 50 years. ANYONE that thinks they actually are effective at ANY form of shielding their children is delusional.
 

raildogg

Lifer
Aug 24, 2004
12,892
572
126
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Hecubus2000
That cop did the right thing. Last time I checked it was against the law to profanity in public. This has nothing to do with politics. The woman was breaking the law and got a warning. That cop would have done the same thing if the stupid woman's bumper sticker said F_ _ _ Kerry.

Oh bullsh*t he would of...he's a worthless neoconservative jacka$$ who hates anything with a brain. Cop should lose his job and NEVER be allowed public position again. EVER.

Profanity laws vary from community to community and in MOST cases are very open to interpretation.

Wow amazing, were you there when this happened? People dont appreciate all the hard work a cop does.

You want to destroy this cop's life because he told that liberal woman to take the sticker off? Without knowing the man personally your insulting this great cop? WOWIEE
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: upsciLLion

The voice of those that make the most noise often shape the stereotypical view of the individuals of that party, no?

How is a having a "FVCK BUSH" bumper sticker on one's car "making a lot of noise"? This is a relatively quiet and mild form of protest, to my mind.

BTW I wouldn't necessarily agree that our stereotypical views of political parties are shaped by the noisiest individuals in those parties.

Why did you answer my question with a question? ;)

I said: I wouldn't necessarily agree that our stereotypical views of political parties are shaped by the noisiest individuals in those parties.

Originally posted by: upsciLLion
It's ridiculous and sad. I don't have time to explain it any other way.

It's ridiculous and sad, but you CAN'T explain why? LOL.

Originally posted by: upsciLLion
I have an interest theory test I have to study for.

I win. :D


 

raildogg

Lifer
Aug 24, 2004
12,892
572
126
Originally posted by: Aegeon
Originally posted by: Zebo
Agree, cop deserves raise for taking stand.. This communities standards are more decent it sounds...IMO all profanity should be illegal ...someday when y'all taking your child to school and see crap like that you'll understand.
The cop clearly deserves to be fired. If such standards exist for a community, they need to be clearly part of the law and publicly debated. No-one has shown that the bumper sticker violated Colorado law. They also need to be clearly uniformly implemented and not selectively implemented by cops who disagree with someone's political views.

Perhaps the most disturbing thing about the article is that it appears that the cop said the person must take off ALL her bumper stickers, including apparently ones without obscenity or profanity on them. This strongly suggets the motive was primarily political for the officer's actions here.

cops are not there to know all the rules. He did that based on his intinct. If he's wrong, the person in custody or charged will be cleared in no time. I cant understand why some of you want to see cops get fired. I mean destroying anyones life is evil in my opinion. Cops are greatly underpaid, and the amount of hard work they do rarely gets mentioned.
 

raildogg

Lifer
Aug 24, 2004
12,892
572
126
Originally posted by: judasmachine
Originally posted by: Hecubus2000
That cop did the right thing. Last time I checked it was against the law to profanity in public. This has nothing to do with politics. The woman was breaking the law and got a warning. That cop would have done the same thing if the stupid woman's bumper sticker said F_ _ _ Kerry.



I seriously doubt he would have done the same thing if it said F-Kerry.

How the hell do you know? are you a personal friend of the cop?
 

imported_Aelius

Golden Member
Apr 25, 2004
1,988
0
0
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: Aegeon
Originally posted by: Zebo
Agree, cop deserves raise for taking stand.. This communities standards are more decent it sounds...IMO all profanity should be illegal ...someday when y'all taking your child to school and see crap like that you'll understand.
The cop clearly deserves to be fired. If such standards exist for a community, they need to be clearly part of the law and publicly debated. No-one has shown that the bumper sticker violated Colorado law. They also need to be clearly uniformly implemented and not selectively implemented by cops who disagree with someone's political views.

Perhaps the most disturbing thing about the article is that it appears that the cop said the person must take off ALL her bumper stickers, including apparently ones without obscenity or profanity on them. This strongly suggets the motive was primarily political for the officer's actions here.

cops are not there to know all the rules. He did that based on his intinct. If he's wrong, the person in custody or charged will be cleared in no time. I cant understand why some of you want to see cops get fired. I mean destroying anyones life is evil in my opinion. Cops are greatly underpaid, and the amount of hard work they do rarely gets mentioned.

Also 60% of cops (roughly) are "bad" cops.

The rest are a mix of super nice people and everything else in between.

This is according to a cop I know with 7+ years of experience in both a major and smaller cities. He said it's the same everywhere.

To me this isn't a surprise as I work for the government and see the exact same thing. The work we do may be very honorable and it's a "good" job but that doesn't mean those working there are saints. Most of them are pricks, assholes, backstabbers, liars and everything else in between. Mix in a good number of super nice people etc etc. It's like that just about anywhere you work.

Cops are not some sort of super beings that are beyond low morals or stupidity. They are Human.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Hecubus2000
That cop did the right thing. Last time I checked it was against the law to profanity in public. This has nothing to do with politics. The woman was breaking the law and got a warning. That cop would have done the same thing if the stupid woman's bumper sticker said F_ _ _ Kerry.

Oh bullsh*t he would of...he's a worthless neoconservative jacka$$ who hates anything with a brain. Cop should lose his job and NEVER be allowed public position again. EVER.

Profanity laws vary from community to community and in MOST cases are very open to interpretation.

Wow amazing, were you there when this happened? People dont appreciate all the hard work a cop does.

You want to destroy this cop's life because he told that liberal woman to take the sticker off? Without knowing the man personally your insulting this great cop? WOWIEE

Don't even TRY to pull that BS with me buddy...I've worked with more law enforcement groups than 90% of the people on these forums...for 13 years I've worked with them, they've been my friends and my collegues. If anyone appreciates the life of a leo more than me I'd love to meet them. So back off.

One of two things are true: 1. he honestly thinks (rightly or not) that the sticker was illegal. If that's true then he handled the entire incident wrong, he abused his power, he has no right to wear a uniform. 2. he knew it wasn't illegal and was spouting his personal venom towards anti-bushers. If that's true then he handled the entire incident wrong, he abused his power, he has no right to wear a uniform.

Cops ARENT more special then anyone else, but they ARE required to hold themselves to higher standard. He failed. Axe him.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: Aegeon
Originally posted by: Zebo
Agree, cop deserves raise for taking stand.. This communities standards are more decent it sounds...IMO all profanity should be illegal ...someday when y'all taking your child to school and see crap like that you'll understand.
The cop clearly deserves to be fired. If such standards exist for a community, they need to be clearly part of the law and publicly debated. No-one has shown that the bumper sticker violated Colorado law. They also need to be clearly uniformly implemented and not selectively implemented by cops who disagree with someone's political views.

Perhaps the most disturbing thing about the article is that it appears that the cop said the person must take off ALL her bumper stickers, including apparently ones without obscenity or profanity on them. This strongly suggets the motive was primarily political for the officer's actions here.

cops are not there to know all the rules. He did that based on his intinct. If he's wrong, the person in custody or charged will be cleared in no time. I cant understand why some of you want to see cops get fired. I mean destroying anyones life is evil in my opinion. Cops are greatly underpaid, and the amount of hard work they do rarely gets mentioned.


BS BS BS BS BS BS BS BS BS BS BS BS

He has power and with that power comes responsibility to use it correctly. Cops are REQUIRED to be correct in action to avoid abuses of the law. Now, if he was ORDERED to act that way by a superior, I'll accept a reduced punishment for him, but otherwise, EVERY cop knows better than that. EVERY one. As a cop you cannot rely on instinct, you have to rely on law. Law, not instinct. Got that???
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Also 60% of cops (roughly) are "bad" cops.

:roll: That's just stupid talk or you live in a very currupt area (new orleans, DC?). I have lots of family and close freinds that are PO's and they are just like everyone else, although a little better due to credit, background, psycho, polygraph exam they must go though to get hired. You don't. I did'nt and I have a government clearance. Sure some use a little descression and hold the blue line but in general they are the first class individuals with a very exacting, demanding, risky and underpaid job. I would'nt want it but respect them for doing it.. Everyone has a college diploma. Everyone volunteers.

PC id like to see some corroboraton of this 60% stat..even an opinion piece is fine.,
 

imported_Aelius

Golden Member
Apr 25, 2004
1,988
0
0
Originally posted by: Zebo
Also 60% of cops (roughly) are "bad" cops.

:roll: That's just stupid talk or you live in a very currupt area (new orleans, DC?). I have lots of family and close freinds that are PO's and they are just like everyone else, although a little better due to credit, background, polygraph exam they must go though to get hired. You don't. I did'nt and I have a government clearance. Sure some use a little descression and hold the blue line but in general they are the first class individuals with a very exacting, demanding, risky and underpaid job. I would'nt want it but respect them for doing it.. Everyone has a college diploma. Everyone volunteers.

Yeah call a cop stupid cause he says cops are no different then anybody else. Look whatever you may think toss it out the window. They are Human. Just because someone hasn't done something really "bad" in their life or alienated co-workers or friends before it doesn't mean they never will. No one can help who they are. When I'm saying "bad" cops I'm generalizing.

An example. A bad cop would be someone who rats on a fellow officer on a workplace technicality to score browny points with management because he is on probation (new officer). Think it never happens? hah

I have a friend who was a CO (Correctional Officer) and said the same thing.

Same thing happens anywhere else I worked.

FYI I didn't have to take a polygraph but if I had even the slightest blemish on my spotless record I would lose my security clearance.

That doesn't mean I'm suddenly a saint. It means I haven't done anything to technically break the law. That's all. It doesn't mean I'm a good or nice person. So when I'm talking about "bad cop" I'm being general. It doesn't mean they are breaking the law although that's obviously included.
 

Aegeon

Golden Member
Nov 2, 2004
1,809
125
106
Originally posted by: raildogg
cops are not there to know all the rules. He did that based on his intinct. If he's wrong, the person in custody or charged will be cleared in no time.
This is absolutely wrong. Cops are definately there to know the rules. Under ordinary circumstances unless a cop believes there is an immenent safety issue or something of the sort at stake, the cop can get on his car radio and ask the people down at police headquarters whether some's action broke the law or not if the cop is uncertain on the matter. Cops frequently arresting people for things they "think" were illegal according to their insticts creates an atmosphere of fear where people are afraid of getting arrested for rather arbitrary reasons rather than breaking the law. Even a temperary arrest can be a humiliating and intimidating process that people want to avoid.

In the case in question, the cop was actually off duty when he heard a complaint from another person offended by the bumper sticker. The cop should have either declined to get involved, or arranged for an on duty cop to get involved and determine whether a crime had been commited. In particular, the warning to the lady not to be seen in the area again or she would be arrested positivily reeks of intimidation and was definately the wrong way to handle the situation.