UltraQuiet
Banned
- Sep 22, 2001
- 5,755
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: SuperTool
High temps in the summer. But in 2000 we had outtages, but prices did not escalate to thousands of dollars per megawatt, because FERC would have stepped in and not let it happen. In 2001 energy companies knew that FERC would stay away if they manipulated the market, and that's exactly what they did. There are tapes of energy execs saying it wouldn't be such a bad idea to keep plants offline a little longer.Originally posted by: DaveSohmer
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Originally posted by: DaveSohmer
Originally posted by: SuperTool
Originally posted by: Chadder007
Originally posted by: SuperTool
The good news is that it won't be a Gore-Bush election.
The bad news is that it will still be a ______-Bush election.
I want that scumbag out of office for what he did during the CA energy crisis, which is absolutely nothing. This is the most anti-Californian president in a long time, and I want him gone.
It was CA's crisis, he left it for the state to work out like they should had. Just shifting the blame from the CA dems to the republican in the White House arent' you?
That's kind of like the police saying they left it up to the criminal and the victim to work things out. It's FERC's job to prevent this type of market manipulation. FERC is staffed by Bush appointees, and they didn't do their job. Therefore blame belongs on Bush, and you are the one trying to shift it.
Who should we blame for FERC not doing their job in 2000 when your state was asking for their help?
Oh I don't know.
You tell me why FERC didn't do it's job.
You didn't answer my question. Who shall we blame for FERC not doing it's job in 2000 before Bush was elected and before he appointed anyone to FERC?
Now you tell me why energy prices didn't explode in 2000, but did in 2001? 2001 was after tech industry was on the decline and summers wasn't as hot, yet we had prices explode through the roof.
Tell me why what hapenned in 2001 didn't happen in 2000? I think it had something to do with who became president in 2001.
You are woefully misinformed. Power costs in CA were going up rapidly in 2000. Your govenor asked FERC for help. Their response:
On December 15, 2000, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission said, "The commission's intention is to enable the markets to catch up to current supply and demand problems and not to reintroduce command and control regulation that has helped to produce the current crisis."
I am not defending Bush, I am simply pointing out (once again) that there is more to the story than "It's all Bush's fault." To insist that is the case in this instance is either disengenuous or ignorant. I have eliminated your ignorance excuse.
