Great as the NYTimes obit is, the comments by readers are stupendous. It seems that most are by people with wonderful personal stories to tell about Moore.updated links...... in the OP.
I'm guessing yours is the DX-50 working at 50 MHz. Mine was the inferior DX2-66 (double clocked. Actual 33 MHz). Did you throw away the PC and keep the CPU?
It's amazing how one man's contributions can have a massive ripple effect, changing billions of lives. There would be like a hundred different computer architectures right now if the 8086 hadn't taken off.
That chip is 33MHz. I swapped it after a bit with an AMD 486DX2 66MHz CPU, which was compatible with the rig, a desktop with a proprietary local bus MB, Vesa Local Bus was right around the corner but had not come out when the guy had put the system together, an EE like I say. He made his living at the time doing Autocad, on small scale architectural plans, I believe. It ran Windows 3.1.
Put it up on eBay now for bidding. You never know. Someone may be willing to pay an insane amount for that to complete their collection or use it for a retro gaming rig. I bet 99% of these chips are in landfills or recycled by now.
Great read, a lot better than NYT’s obit on Gordon Moore IMO. Oddly enough, the byline for the obit credits a former editor who passed away in 2017. So this obituary was written a long time ago (in advance is standard industry practice).
Didn‘t the DX-50 run hot, and didn’t sell very many? I don’t think the DX2 and later clock-multiplied CPUs were inferior. IIRC these introduced the multiplier from bus clock rate to CPU core clock rate, at least for x86 procs. I don’t know if RISC chips were already doing that.
Facebook
Twitter