• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Discussion Google Tensor SoC thread

Page 13 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
He's talking about phones that have had generic Android installed on them over the vendor install. The Pixel does it fine because its Android is the vendor Android. If you replaced it with Lineage or any other generic Android install you'd find Android Pay no longer works, as well as a number of banking/financial apps.

Who the hell buys a Pixel to not use Google's Android?

I get doing that with a Xiaomi or a Honor for the excellent hardware plus custom software. But a Pixel?!
 
Most others dropped support and google remains.
Pixelos is nothing special anyway.
Limited launcher, font issues..
I know I've read recently an article claiming the underground has switched to Pixels for it 🙂
 
What are you talking about?
Was talking about going to lineageOS and nfc payments are not available. 10 years ago I was content buying cheap xiaomi phones (Mi8 was great and only 200€) but at the time, payments were mostly cash and card readers sparse... Now everything is changed, my whole banking is done by phone.
 
I need to say this but...
There are the SoC leaks of the Kirin 9030 on the Mate 80 Pro Max

1764173743873.pngHow Google had to screw up very hard with the Tensor G5 to the point that a"7nm" Kirin 9030 matches them?

That might be a clear lesson on how to NOT to make bad desicions when making a processor.
 
You know the first question should be if it is even running at that clock rate for the duration of the test
This reviewer does check that, tho idk if he did specifically in this video.
In the exynos 2500 video, he did note that the X925 was not holding it's boost, and noted it in the graph.
1773254759937.png
 
No plot of frequency vs time?
It's not worth speculating further without it. Because that's the #1 most likely culprit
Well, as I mentioned in my previous comment, the reviewer does keep track of the frequency of the cores. In the exynos 2500 video, not only did he point out thermal throttling, but even showed a snippet of the clip where you can see the frequency of each cores during testing as it was being tested.
Given he did not mention thermal throttling in this video though, at least from what I parsed of it (I don't understand mandarin lol), I think it's safe to assume that isn't the culprit.
Plus, you see a ~10% perf gap for the mid core too, despite the 8gen3 mid core only clocking ~3% faster. Do you think it's thermal throttling here too?
1773341620444.png
 
Back
Top