It would be overly generous to call it fast, when it is among the slowest, if not THE slowest. I think only iphone is slower, but only in like 0-100 scenario.They do have fast charging though, just not the fastest charging. The Pixel 10, who IIRC is the first to have mandatory battery protection (voltage nuking), charges at 30W.
More games..
RIP Google...
It does jive with their battery problems of recent models. If you know that you are cheating out on your batteries, you do your best to protect them with software and slow charging.It would be overly generous to call it fast, when it is among the slowest, if not THE slowest. I think only iphone is slower, but only in like 0-100 scenario.
In fact, just checked gsmarena, even Pixel 8 Pro is faster than Pixel 9 Pro.. It's just so odd. Like they want to emulate Apple in EVERYTHING without giving any thought if it is something that should be emulated, or if they can get away with it.
Aparently they might use the DXTP-64-2048 version for Tensor G6. The reason? driversI do wonder what drove Google to go with PowerVR. Perhaps ARM got cheeky and asked for too much money for an Immortalis IP?
Even so, Google could have gone with a larger PowerVR DXT. Perhaps this will be significantly faster after some driver optimizations, but for the moment it does look really bad.
If I had to guess or start looking for possible clues, I would look at compute potential for AI / video / image processing. ATM Google values these much more than gaming perf.I do wonder what drove Google to go with PowerVR.
Aren't all the Tensor Gx using Google's own TPU block for ML loads, though? Choosing an iGPU for AI inference sounds a bit redundant in their case.If I had to guess or start looking for possible clues, I would look at compute potential for AI / video / image processing. ATM Google values these much more than gaming perf.
Example - AFAIK their 100X zoom feature on Pixel 10 is essentially an AI recreation of the blurry zoomed crop of the camera sensor.
Well... if that AI recreation gives a hint... it might fail compared to the Samsung S22 or 23 Ultra X100 zoom.If I had to guess or start looking for possible clues, I would look at compute potential for AI / video / image processing. ATM Google values these much more than gaming perf.
Example - AFAIK their 100X zoom feature on Pixel 10 is essentially an AI recreation of the blurry zoomed crop of the camera sensor.
Yes they are, I was thinking of additional compute, companies these days seem obsessed with enabling some kind of marketable use of AI and/or "magic compute" on their devices.Aren't all the Tensor Gx using Google's own TPU block for ML loads, though?
It might fail period, they're not pictures anymore.it might fail compared to the Samsung S22 or 23 Ultra X100 zoom.
I should have known this seeing the spec but they are awful in implementation as well even Xiaomi did better for their first Mobile AP.So poor performance, poor battery life, runs hot and costs the same as other flagships?
Guess the people who blamed Samsung for the Pixel's SoC being terrible were off the mark!
So poor performance, poor battery life, runs hot and costs the same as other flagships?
Guess the people who blamed Samsung for the Pixel's SoC being terrible were off the mark!
Paying TSMC more can't fix Google problems apparently.So poor performance, poor battery life, runs hot and costs the same as other flagships?
Guess the people who blamed Samsung for the Pixel's SoC being terrible were off the mark!
Second. The first one is the Surge S1. And even that was decent in their time, was on par with Snapdragon 625!I should have known this seeing the spec but they are awful in implementation as well even Xiaomi did better for their first Mobile AP.
Heck, if Kirin 9030 manages to be decent enough to be on par with SD 8 Gen 2 in brute force and SD 8 Gen 3 with their own optimizations, knowing their limits... it will be a BIG humillation against Google.I've heard the upcoming Exynos 2600 is actually pretty good and may directly compete with the A19 and Elite 2, or at least get a hell of a lot closer than the Tensor G5.
You should see the pixel subreddit. "Just wait the battery will be better after updates and optimizations." Software can't replace crappy hardware completely.So poor performance, poor battery life, runs hot and costs the same as other flagships?
Guess the people who blamed Samsung for the Pixel's SoC being terrible were off the mark!
I am pretty happy with my Pixel 9a battery life thoughView attachment 129730
Battery life looks absolutely horrible. Especially if you like to watch videos and play games.
View attachment 129731
View attachment 129732
![]()
Google Pixel 10 review
Just like in previous years, the most affordable Pixel from the flagship family gets a regular OLED panel, not an LTPO one. It's still 6.3" in diagonal,...www.gsmarena.com
I skipped a bull
I am pretty happy with my Pixel 9a battery life though
As long they don't fully control and master HW, SW is not a solution.You should see the pixel subreddit. "Just wait the battery will be better after updates and optimizations." Software can't replace crappy hardware completely.