Google Map Killer

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

DVK916

Banned
Dec 12, 2005
2,765
0
0
It seems like every map program gets my house in the wrong location, my house is 5 houses down from where they claim it is. Also like google the arial is out of date.
 

DVK916

Banned
Dec 12, 2005
2,765
0
0
Originally posted by: aphex
The maps themselves are older than google.

My street dosent even show up on this one and its been there for 2 years.

For my area it is same map, a map over 5 years old.
 

suse920

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2005
6,889
0
0
Originally posted by: DVK916
Originally posted by: aphex
The maps themselves are older than google.

My street dosent even show up on this one and its been there for 2 years.

For my area it is same map, a map over 5 years old.



In the just renamed my street by my camop in maine and it showed up... also the road the built last winter. Overall i have a lot of potential google world still rocks it though
 

DVK916

Banned
Dec 12, 2005
2,765
0
0
Another plus for Microsoft map is they have an aerial of Davis, CA and my school UCD. Google has no aerial of Davis, Ca.
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,301
12,867
136
Originally posted by: CKDragon
I don't like that I can't seemlessly pan from one picture to the next. I'm not crazy about it.

2 advantages so far:
-Obviously the bird's-eye-view pics are closer/clearer
-Pics seem more recent, at least I can tell that the pic of my campus in Philadelphia was taken last winter.

I'm not liking the interface much, though.

agreed
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
I love these 5 year old maps. Geesh, my house was built 3 years ago and it's still not on there. That may actually be a good thing.
 

middlehead

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2004
4,573
2
81
It's got one-way streets marked properly in my town, I like that. No other map service has figured that out yet.

No birds eye for my area, though.
 
Aug 23, 2000
15,509
1
81
Originally posted by: DVK916
It seems like every map program gets my house in the wrong location, my house is 5 houses down from where they claim it is. Also like google the arial is out of date.

Well if anyone gets "whacked" 5 houses down, count your blessing because it was meant for you.

 
Jul 12, 2001
10,142
2
0
i keep having it say "birds eye view available" then I click it and it says, "no birds eye view available" and im in los angeles
 

uhohs

Diamond Member
Oct 29, 2005
7,660
44
91
Originally posted by: jfall
lol @ microsoft copying everything google does

microsoft has had satellite photo with terraserver since 1997. ohnoes, they're copying google.
 

chuckywang

Lifer
Jan 12, 2004
20,133
1
0
The aerial photos are the same quality as google's and the Birds Eye view photos, though incredibly cool, is VERY limited. They don't even have them for Chicago.
 

Kelemvor

Lifer
May 23, 2002
16,928
8
81
Use the 'Locate Me" link and see how accurate it is. I'm at work and it pegged me in Chicago. That's sort of close but we're actually up west of Milwaukee, WI.
 

JLGatsby

Banned
Sep 6, 2005
4,525
0
0
Originally posted by: FrankyJunior
Use the 'Locate Me" link and see how accurate it is. I'm at work and it pegged me in Chicago. That's sort of close but we're actually up west of Milwaukee, WI.

It's very accurate though when you're using a wireless connection. Not very accurate with a desktop.
 

Parrotheader

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 1999
3,434
2
0
Nice.

Competition's a good thing. In the case of maps, Google had clearly raised the bar and now some of their biggest competitors (Yahoo and Microsoft) have both responded in kind. Neither of their new offerings are perfect and both are still in beta. But they're definitely much stronger competitors once again. I like the overlay options on Yahoo's and the fact that Microsofts had some of the 'newer' streets around me correct that Google still doesn't show yet.
 

CKDragon

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2001
3,875
0
0
HOLY CRAP. Just checked TaskManager... this thing pushed Firefox to use 1,183,764 MB of RAM. I'm sure there's enough fault to go around between FF and MS, but wow.

CK

NOTE: I just noticed that if I leave the browser completely idle it seems to jump a meg every 20 seconds or so. I've got 2GB of RAM, by the way.