• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Gizmodo Has Reached A New Low

Patranus

Patranus

Diamond Member
How Realistic Would a Robot Have to Be for You to Have Sex with It?

Implements for human-robot relations already run the gamut from abstract Fleshlights to fully-articulated, Uncanny Valley-straddling love dolls. But is more realism always better?

That is, if properly equipped, would an android from U.S. Robotics still be as attractive as, say, a Fembot? Then, what about a Hookerbot from Futurama? It's a slippery slope, to be sure, but essentially when does hanky-panky with an electronic being turn into humping a VCR? Let us know what you think in the comments!
Click to expand...
http://gizmodo.com/5885226/how-realistic-would-a-robot-have-to-be-for-you-to-have-sex-with-it

Really guys?
 
When she's in the kitchen, barefoot, and pregnant... HEY!

Let's face it, people use inanimate objects all the time.
 
Last edited:
People will have sex with a hole in their mattress. As long as there's a machine that looks even slight feminine, there will be a guy happy to stick his dick in it!
 
kinda hard for them to get lower then the iphone thing and getting banned from trade shows for using a universial code spammer to turn off displays when people are presenting
 
Sex is just an avenue...robots will eventually fill this role, it's only a matter of time.

When I am looking for a partner, sex is not really a major criteria as it's too easy to get.
 
snoopy7548 said:
I believe he was referring to his mother.
Click to expand...

rOqfzZy.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top