Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter Benchmarks

[fbrdphreak]

So the only benchmarks I've found for GRAW are here:
http://www.guru3d.com/article/Videocards/354/12
They used an FX-57 with 2GB RAM.

Anyone got other benchmarks to add?

 

[Wreckage]

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/nvidia-gf7950gx2_18.html

 

[fbrdphreak]

Originally posted by: Wreckage
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/nvidia-gf7950gx2_18.html

Damn, making me thing about getting that 7900GT Sig Edition now instead of my X1900XT...

 

[akshayt]

on a 6600GT it is crap even at 800*600 + lowest video settings

 

[fbrdphreak]

Originally posted by: akshayt
on a 6600GT it is crap even at 800*600 + lowest video settings

On a two-generation old card I'm sure it is. Why don't you go fix your X1900XTX first

 

[Fadey]

Um i could reinstall it and try it on my 3700+ @ 2.5 , 2 gig ram and my 7950 @ 600 / 1450.. but i think it would just be similar to what the fps in that xbit review is..

 

[Matt2]

Originally posted by: fbrdphreak

Originally posted by: akshayt
on a 6600GT it is crap even at 800*600 + lowest video settings

On a two-generation old card I'm sure it is. Why don't you go fix your X1900XTX first

LOL

I'm really glad I bought and beat this game on XBOX360 instead of holding out for the PC version. I think it would have just pissed me off.

 

[fbrdphreak]

Originally posted by: Fadey
Um i could reinstall it and try it on my 3700+ @ 2.5 , 2 gig ram and my 7950 @ 600 / 1450.. but i think it would just be similar to what the fps in that xbit review is..

Thanks but I think that hassle wouldn't be necessary, the Xbit labs review was quite sufficient.

Now to actually play it and see if the X1900XT will do 1680x1050 decent enough for me...

 

[fbrdphreak]

Originally posted by: Matt2

Originally posted by: fbrdphreak

Originally posted by: akshayt
on a 6600GT it is crap even at 800*600 + lowest video settings

On a two-generation old card I'm sure it is. Why don't you go fix your X1900XTX first

LOL

I'm really glad I bought and beat this game on XBOX360 instead of holding out for the PC version. I think it would have just pissed me off.

I read that the PC version has better graphics and some diff stuff in it; not just a port

I dunno we'll see. Everyone always looks at benchies and says "OMG that's unplayable at 40FPS" but personally I don't notice those "low frame rates" too much. We'll see

 

[Fadey]

Hmm i never uninstalled just did a fraps on it and at 1600x1200 16xaf and everything max my max fps was 70 but lowest was 41 when fire etc... was 45 - 55 most the time. Prolly my poxy cpu and board holding it back too.

 

[fbrdphreak]

How does it look with just the avg/default setup? i.e. no AF, etc. I'd probably rather game @ 1680x1050 with less eye candy, but I haven't seen how my 2005 scales, so we'll see i spose

 

[Kromis]

I have heard of GRAW but I have never knew it stood for Ghost Recon Advanced Warrior! I have heard of Ghost Recon Advanced Warfare though (I'm just yanking your chain)

 

[GeeFizzleDizzle]

Originally posted by: Kromis
I have heard of GRAW but I have never knew it stood for Ghost Recon Advanced Warrior! I have heard of Ghost Recon Advanced Warfare though (I'm just yanking your chain)

Don't yank that chain too hard...it's actually Advanced Warfighter.

 

[Ichigo]

My GRAW demo ran perfect at 1280x1024 using an X800XL at all max settings but texture at medium (couldn't choose). Like, I never noticed framerate issues so it must've stayed at around 30+fps. This isn't that demanding a game.

 

[Nextman916]

I would like to see some benchmarks on some lower end cards.....

 

[fbrdphreak]

Originally posted by: Ichigo
My GRAW demo ran perfect at 1280x1024 using an X800XL at all max settings but texture at medium (couldn't choose). Like, I never noticed framerate issues so it must've stayed at around 30+fps. This isn't that demanding a game.

Makes me feel better thanks. 40FPS seems like it would be smooth to me, guess we'll see

 

[LittleNemoNES]

Beat the game on an x1900xt. It was a playable experience but It was hard to focus with a less than 40fps framerate (eyes wandered about). With crossfire this game is about almost 85% >50 fps.

 

[fbrdphreak]

Originally posted by: gersson
Beat the game on an x1900xt. It was a playable experience but It was hard to focus with a less than 40fps framerate (eyes wandered about). With crossfire this game is about almost 85% >50 fps.

Good to know. What settings did you beat it on?

 

[LittleNemoNES]

all max high @ 1680x1050, like I said, with a single card was a playable experience.

 

[Ackmed]

Originally posted by: fbrdphreak

Originally posted by: Fadey
Um i could reinstall it and try it on my 3700+ @ 2.5 , 2 gig ram and my 7950 @ 600 / 1450.. but i think it would just be similar to what the fps in that xbit review is..

Thanks but I think that hassle wouldn't be necessary, the Xbit labs review was quite sufficient.

Now to actually play it and see if the X1900XT will do 1680x1050 decent enough for me...

Sufficient? Hardly, there are no AA benches. And frankly, the game looks like crap without AA. It doesnt look that good to begin with, but with no AA.. its even worse.

 

[fbrdphreak]

Originally posted by: Ackmed

Originally posted by: fbrdphreak

Originally posted by: Fadey
Um i could reinstall it and try it on my 3700+ @ 2.5 , 2 gig ram and my 7950 @ 600 / 1450.. but i think it would just be similar to what the fps in that xbit review is..

Thanks but I think that hassle wouldn't be necessary, the Xbit labs review was quite sufficient.

Now to actually play it and see if the X1900XT will do 1680x1050 decent enough for me...

Sufficient? Hardly, there are no AA benches. And frankly, the game looks like crap without AA. It doesnt look that good to begin with, but with no AA.. its even worse.

The game doesn't support AA.

 

[Wreckage]

Originally posted by: Ackmed

Originally posted by: fbrdphreak

Originally posted by: Fadey
Um i could reinstall it and try it on my 3700+ @ 2.5 , 2 gig ram and my 7950 @ 600 / 1450.. but i think it would just be similar to what the fps in that xbit review is..

Thanks but I think that hassle wouldn't be necessary, the Xbit labs review was quite sufficient.

Now to actually play it and see if the X1900XT will do 1680x1050 decent enough for me...

Sufficient? Hardly, there are no AA benches. And frankly, the game looks like crap without AA. It doesnt look that good to begin with, but with no AA.. its even worse.

The game supports high dynamic range mode (HDR) and uses a deferred shadowing method that allows rendering the lighting of a scene after its geometry has been rendered. In theory, this method is faster, but it is not compatible with FSAA.

 

[LittleNemoNES]

THe game looks great even though it doesn't have AA. The shading is amazing -- best color, shadows of any game out now. Too bad about the AA. I heard that they will include it in a patch.

 

[Ackmed]

Originally posted by: fbrdphreak
The game doesn't support AA.

Yes it does.

Originally posted by: Wreckage

The game supports high dynamic range mode (HDR) and uses a deferred shadowing method that allows rendering the lighting of a scene after its geometry has been rendered. In theory, this method is faster, but it is not compatible with FSAA.

And? Im well aware of their coding problems. I was one of the first to discover that AA didnt work with their deferred lighting in the demo. They should have benched with HDR, and then with AA. As I said, with no AA, it looks pretty bad. Even at 192x1200 it does. Power lines, etc. look horrible. Its my opinion most people would rather have AA, than HDR. Their arrogance in thinking that their way of thinking is everyones, is not good.

Also;

* Deathmatch mode, Map Editor for Deathmatch and Domination, anti-cheat fixes, Anti Aliasing feature, and New co-op maps

http://forums.ubi.com/groupee/forums/a/tpc/f/2791043913/m/2861017644

Much like Bethesda, that either lied, or was just too lazy, they said they two couldnt be done together. Now it seems it will work.

Edit, here is a pic I took the day the demo came out. You can obviously see the power line looks horrible, and is all jaggie. Having their deferred lighting off, and AA on, results in a much cleaner pic.

 

[Nextman916]

wow i guess there is AA now