CZroe
Lifer
*sigh*Sorry CZroe but, zipping your jacket...falls under health and welfare when you're six years old NOT, preference.
Are you going to make the case for that declaration or am I just going to have to call it baseless again?
Explain the health concern where a supervised child in a populated area could get sick or die or injured because she didn't zip up her jacket before getting uncomfortably cold. That's what is required to contradict the reasoning I used. I'll wait.
BTW: The 6yo undeniably expressed a preference. There shouldn't even be an argument there. Re-read the OP: She "happily" wears all of the things required to be healthy and safe. The only remaining concern was an invalid one... unless you can demonstrate a valid safety concern that would require her to zip up her jacket before she is uncomfortably cold in the scenario described in the OP. They aren't running the Iditarod in the Alaskan wilderness.
Last edited:
