Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: videogames101
/b/ already took care of this.
right...but it was not resolved when this was posted. I am on 4chan fapping to kiddie porn.
Fixed.
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: videogames101
/b/ already took care of this.
right...but it was not resolved when this was posted. I am on 4chan fapping to kiddie porn.
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: alkemyst
like I said call the lawton county DA if you don't believe the story, or the Lawton animal shelter BEFORE you start defending someone blindly.
In this country we are innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Do you understand what that means? It means this guy is INNOCENT, until PROVEN guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
that applies to our court system, not our people. I don't think you have watched the videos nor called about the case.
Are you trying to troll? What part of the videos were not abuse to you?
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: videogames101
/b/ already took care of this.
right...but it was not resolved when this was posted. I am on 4chan fapping to kiddie porn.
Fixed.
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: videogames101
/b/ already took care of this.
right...but it was not resolved when this was posted. I am on 4chan fapping to kiddie porn.
Fixed.
get the fuck out of my thread child. I like how you dodged claiming to be an intellectual and have only a high school diploma. YOU GO BOY!
Originally posted by: senseamp
You are entitled to your opinion, and I am entitled to mine. I did not call you out, you called me out, so if anyone is trolling it's you. :roll: You called PETA and ASPCA, maybe you should have called the vet and find out if there were any actual injuries before you call for this guy's prosecution.
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: senseamp
You are entitled to your opinion, and I am entitled to mine. I did not call you out, you called me out, so if anyone is trolling it's you. :roll: You called PETA and ASPCA, maybe you should have called the vet and find out if there were any actual injuries before you call for this guy's prosecution.
Did I say I didn't call the vet? I spoke to both PETA and ASPCA directly prior to the animal being picked up. :roll: Please read and then re-read if you have trouble understanding.
I am speaking from facts, you are only guessing. Like I said, pick up the fucking phone and get the facts. The animal's treatment was deemed abuse. They cannot give much more than that, if it was not abused it would not be in custody. If it were not abused, the police would not have been involved. If it were not abused, the DA would not have a case on it's agenda. These are all facts, there is no need for OPINION.
For anyone here to say they have any doubt that the animal was abused, either they didn't watch the video, read the press releases, acknowledge that law enforcement is STILL involved in this or are simply psychopathic themselves. Outside of that only leaves trolling. So please pick one.
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
You've been to jail and you hang out on 4chan.
Seriously, in just about every thread you post in you come off as being a total scumbag. Whether it's about stealing, relationships with women, or just about anything you reveal yourself to be slimy. It doesn't surprise me at all that you've been to jail. You're devious, untrustworthy, and make poor decisions.
Your prior stay in jail probably won't be the last time you stay there. It's where people like you belong.
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Did I say I didn't call the vet? I spoke to both PETA and ASPCA directly prior to the animal being picked up. :roll: Please read and then re-read if you have trouble understanding.
I am speaking from facts, you are only guessing. Like I said, pick up the fucking phone and get the facts. The animal's treatment was deemed abuse. They cannot give much more than that, if it was not abused it would not be in custody. If it were not abused, the police would not have been involved. If it were not abused, the DA would not have a case on it's agenda. These are all facts, there is no need for OPINION.
Originally posted by: senseamp
Allegedly abused. A JURY still has to decide if there was actual abuse.
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: senseamp
Allegedly abused. A JURY still has to decide if there was actual abuse.
The jury will not be the ones to necessarily determine whether abuse took place you realize, right? Depends on how the DA has the kids plea.
I don't think you know much about cases on abuse of animals and must be just trying to troll.
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
You are logically wrong on almost all of your points. The cornerstone of your argument seems to be that the police wouldn't have got involved or taken the animal into custody if it hadn't already been determined that there was wrongdoing.
However that's incorrect.
The police will arrest people or gather evidence on suspicion of wrongdoing. It doesn't mean that it has been determined. Police often detain people or confiscate evidence based on suspicion of illegal acts and to see if they can build a case. If they can't, they release the people/evidence.
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: senseamp
Allegedly abused. A JURY still has to decide if there was actual abuse.
The jury will not be the ones to necessarily determine whether abuse took place you realize, right? Depends on how the DA has the kids plea.
I don't think you know much about cases on abuse of animals and must be just trying to troll.
Trying to figure out if you are stupid, emo, or both.
So far there is no conviction OR guilty plea.
Originally posted by: alkemyst
The presumption of innocence is something really for the courts and those that do not have knowledge of the crime. If I am on a street and I see someone face to face and they shoot me. I know for a fact they are guilty.
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Intellectual: of or relating to the intellect or its use: developed or chiefly guided by the intellect rather than by emotion or experience.
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: alkemyst
The presumption of innocence is something really for the courts and those that do not have knowledge of the crime. If I am on a street and I see someone face to face and they shoot me. I know for a fact they are guilty.
Not in my eyes.
Besides, it's probably because you're robbing them.
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: alkemyst
The presumption of innocence is something really for the courts and those that do not have knowledge of the crime. If I am on a street and I see someone face to face and they shoot me. I know for a fact they are guilty.
Not in my eyes.
Besides, it's probably because you're robbing them.
why be a coward and edit that you'd think I should be shot? Be a man and stand up for something for once.
Originally posted by: Jschmuck2
Could you two bitches stop derailing the thread? Personally, I would like to know the series of events behind finding the poopswoosh responsible. How did they figure it out?
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteven
Originally posted by: Jschmuck2
Could you two bitches stop derailing the thread? Personally, I would like to know the series of events behind finding the poopswoosh responsible. How did they figure it out?
I am guessing then searched based on his YouTube ID, and came up with matches against his FaceBook and MySpace, and went from there.
Originally posted by: jinduy
as a cat owner, i dont think i want to see the vid. it'd just make me go to bed a bit pissed off
