Germain Greer makes most red pilled interview in history

[IncelGolum]

Redefine rape as something it's not. Then say it's no big deal.

I didn't even know it was called rape until recently. I always called it forcey fun time.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Looks like a normal first post to me...

 

[brycejones]

My personality.

Why?

 

[darkswordsman17]

I believe this will be the cure for all inceldom if it becomes law. Free sex for every male whenever he feels like it.

Even if you were given sex slaves you pathetic dipshits would likely be impotent because you would still know you couldn't actually get sex without it being forced. They'd have to come up with a new sex registration for it too. "Sir, here's your Rapist License".

A better fix would be for you to seek therapy and psychologist that you definitely need, because you have mental problems that is the real source of your ills. They are the cause of you not being able to get sex, and not the other way around as people like you (if you even admit that you have mental health issues) believe.

Sex slaves won't resolve your impotent rage, it'll actually just cause it to burn worse and likely you'll start on the path towards being a serial predator (if not serial killer; a lot of them ended up that way because their impotent rage made it so they couldn't actually get off, and so they'd get violent and realize that helped, with some only able to get release once they killed someone). At best, it'll just turn you into junkies, and you'll stop getting satisfaction from sex.

You'll still be inferior to people that are able to consummate truly consensual intimate sex, and you and everyone will know it which will worsen your shame. Only it'll probably be public record too since I hope you dolts don't think they'd have some ultra secretive setup to protect your identities.

The sexual release you seek is not something that you will get through such means. The vagina of a woman that doesn't want you is not any more inviting than your hand/sock/fleshlight/couch/tree/donkey that you've been using. If all you want is a wet hole, there's plenty of other ones, and believe it or not, a woman's vagina is not magically perfect for satisfying a man such that it will unlock the latent part of you that you've had so unfulfilled.

And, do you really think that the women that would be given to you would be the idealized ones that you wet your sheets over? No, it'll be the ones that have no other options. I'll let you guess if those will live up to your fantasy. And that's if you're not so completely skewed that your "ideal woman" is anime characters or other beings.

It must suck to be so fucked in the head that you aren't even capable of fully appreciating sex but holding it in such reverence that its completely consumed your mind. As long as you reinforce that though, you will be doomed to such fate.

 

[IncelGolum]

Why?

 

[brycejones]

Try to use your words.

 

[IncelGolum]

Even if you were given sex slaves you pathetic dipshits would likely be impotent because you would still know you couldn't actually get sex without it being forced. They'd have to come up with a new sex registration for it too. "Sir, here's your Rapist License".

A better fix would be for you to seek therapy and psychologist that you definitely need, because you have mental problems that is the real source of your ills. They are the cause of you not being able to get sex, and not the other way around as people like you (if you even admit that you have mental health issues) believe.

Sex slaves won't resolve your impotent rage, it'll actually just cause it to burn worse and likely you'll start on the path towards being a serial predator (if not serial killer; a lot of them ended up that way because their impotent rage made it so they couldn't actually get off, and so they'd get violent and realize that helped, with some only able to get release once they killed someone). At best, it'll just turn you into junkies, and you'll stop getting satisfaction from sex.

You'll still be inferior to people that are able to consummate truly consensual intimate sex, and you and everyone will know it which will worsen your shame. Only it'll probably be public record too since I hope you dolts don't think they'd have some ultra secretive setup to protect your identities.

The sexual release you seek is not something that you will get through such means. The vagina of a woman that doesn't want you is not any more inviting than your hand/sock/fleshlight/couch/tree/donkey that you've been using. If all you want is a wet hole, there's plenty of other ones, and believe it or not, a woman's vagina is not magically perfect for satisfying a man such that it will unlock the latent part of you that you've had so unfulfilled.

And, do you really think that the women that would be given to you would be the idealized ones that you wet your sheets over? No, it'll be the ones that have no other options. I'll let you guess if those will live up to your fantasy. And that's if you're not so completely skewed that your "ideal woman" is anime characters or other beings.

It must suck to be so fucked in the head that you aren't even capable of fully appreciating sex but holding it in such reverence that its completely consumed your mind. As long as you reinforce that though, you will be doomed to such fate.

I will make a prayer to Saint BlackOps2cel to guide you confused Betas towards the path of inceldom.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Yup this doesn’t look like an alt account at all

 

[brycejones]

Yup this doesn’t look like an alt account at all

OP needs to talk more about his toaster. Thread is not living up to the first post at all.

 

[Victorian Gray]

My personality.

Try toasters.

 

[MomentsofSanity]

My personality.

And you think advocating that women should be raped to appease your personal desires is supposed to improve that personality?

Here’s an idea. Kill yourself instead. That way no one important gets hurt. Try that shit with my daughter you’d wish you took the first option.

 

[MomentsofSanity]

I didn't even know it was called rape until recently. I always called it forcey fun time.

And then I see this post. Another BS alt account for trolling.

 

[Moonbeam]

What are we looking at here. Is anybody looking at what I see as Greer's real intention. Isn't it this:

Society wanted women to believe that rape destroyed them, she said. “We haven’t been destroyed, we’ve been bloody annoyed is what we’ve been.”

Isn't what she is saying is that it is 'the internalized magnitude' of the crime of rape the source of how violated one feels. Isn't she just presenting rational reasons that if women internalized would cure feelings they are victims with all the emotional damage victims feel? She is appealing to women not to suffer any more humiliation or shame from the experience of rape than one would feel say by sucking on a hot dog. In the abstract it's a piece of meat in a hole. Rape would leave no scars on a woman who had attained enlightenment.

She is asking women to rise above self contempt because they have been violated and she wants the penalty of rape reduced in accordance. We suffer less from small crimes than large crimes committed against our person in accordance with how we have internalized the concept of being violated. Her aim is to use absolute reason to reduce the negative effects rape has on the emotional life of women by looking at the physical damage and ignoring the emotional. This is a wonderful aim but is it realistic?

What is rape? Is it the satisfaction of a physical need without regard to the emotional needs of others. I think not so much that but the desire to harm, to dominate, to control and emotionally humiliate another person, to inflict one's own inner suffering and humiliation on somebody else. And to reduce the penalty for that kind of abuse begs the question, who was irrational first, the rapist or the person raped who suffers from it?

Why do we not appeal to the reason of the rapist that the job of any real human, any real man, is to put the emotional needs of others before acting our our own sickness. Why should it fall to women to not be damaged by intentional attempts to humiliate and demean and not the job of the perpetrator to seek professional help.

Rapist commit rape to inflict suffering because it does. Why should it fall first on women to deal with this. The crime of rape is real emotionally for most of us. You can't cause enlightenment by reducing the severity of the crime, because that gives a green light to unenlightened men. Enlightenment for women will be had by the by the full expression of rage and grief for oneself as a victim. There would be no intention to violate women if the violation were not possible in the first place. We know what being violated is because we have all experienced it long ago in childhood. If you want to feel free from that deal with the origin of the pain. Don't give a pass to those who act out their suffering by trying to inflict pain on others. That is not permitted and must be stopped as best it can be.

 

[interchange]

No need for feminists to scream it at her. She is trivializing rape. Rape is such a heinous and violent crime because it is often extremely traumatic to a person's sense of integrity, autonomy, and safety.

 

[interchange]

What are we looking at here. Is anybody looking at what I see as Greer's real intention. Isn't it this:

Society wanted women to believe that rape destroyed them, she said. “We haven’t been destroyed, we’ve been bloody annoyed is what we’ve been.”

Isn't what she is saying is that it is 'the internalized magnitude' of the crime of rape the source of how violated one feels. Isn't she just presenting rational reasons that if women internalized would cure feelings they are victims with all the emotional damage victims feel? She is appealing to women not to suffer any more humiliation or shame from the experience of rape than one would feel say by sucking on a hot dog. In the abstract it's a piece of meat in a hole. Rape would leave no scars on a woman who had attained enlightenment.

She is asking women to rise above self contempt because they have been violated and she wants the penalty of rape reduced in accordance. We suffer less from small crimes than large crimes committed against our person in accordance with how we have internalized the concept of being violated. Her aim is to use absolute reason to reduce the negative effects rape has on the emotional life of women by looking at the physical damage and ignoring the emotional. This is a wonderful aim but is it realistic?

What is rape? Is it the satisfaction of a physical need without regard to the emotional needs of others. I think not so much that but the desire to harm, to dominate, to control and emotionally humiliate another person, to inflict one's own inner suffering and humiliation on somebody else. And to reduce the penalty for that kind of abuse begs the question, who was irrational first, the rapist or the person raped who suffers from it?

Why do we not appeal to the reason of the rapist that the job of any real human, any real man, is to put the emotional needs of others before acting our our own sickness. Why should it fall to women to not be damaged by intentional attempts to humiliate and demean and not the job of the perpetrator to seek professional help.

Rapist commit rape to inflict suffering because it does. Why should it fall first on women to deal with this. The crime of rape is real emotionally for most of us. You can't cause enlightenment by reducing the severity of the crime, because that gives a green light to unenlightened men. Enlightenment for women will be had by the by the full expression of rage and grief for oneself as a victim. There would be no intention to violate women if the violation were not possible in the first place. We know what being violated is because we have all experienced it long ago in childhood. If you want to feel free from that deal with the origin of the pain. Don't give a pass to those who act out their suffering by trying to inflict pain on others. That is not permitted and must be stopped as best it can be.

Is the path to that empowerment by letting violaters be treated lightly? As for all cases, I advocate just punishment and respect for the dignity of the violator, but her words seem to attempt to invalidate the trauma rather than lead people beyond it.

 

[IncelGolum]

What are we looking at here. Is anybody looking at what I see as Greer's real intention. Isn't it this:

Society wanted women to believe that rape destroyed them, she said. “We haven’t been destroyed, we’ve been bloody annoyed is what we’ve been.”

Isn't what she is saying is that it is 'the internalized magnitude' of the crime of rape the source of how violated one feels. Isn't she just presenting rational reasons that if women internalized would cure feelings they are victims with all the emotional damage victims feel? She is appealing to women not to suffer any more humiliation or shame from the experience of rape than one would feel say by sucking on a hot dog. In the abstract it's a piece of meat in a hole. Rape would leave no scars on a woman who had attained enlightenment.

She is asking women to rise above self contempt because they have been violated and she wants the penalty of rape reduced in accordance. We suffer less from small crimes than large crimes committed against our person in accordance with how we have internalized the concept of being violated. Her aim is to use absolute reason to reduce the negative effects rape has on the emotional life of women by looking at the physical damage and ignoring the emotional. This is a wonderful aim but is it realistic?

What is rape? Is it the satisfaction of a physical need without regard to the emotional needs of others. I think not so much that but the desire to harm, to dominate, to control and emotionally humiliate another person, to inflict one's own inner suffering and humiliation on somebody else. And to reduce the penalty for that kind of abuse begs the question, who was irrational first, the rapist or the person raped who suffers from it?

Why do we not appeal to the reason of the rapist that the job of any real human, any real man, is to put the emotional needs of others before acting our our own sickness. Why should it fall to women to not be damaged by intentional attempts to humiliate and demean and not the job of the perpetrator to seek professional help.

Rapist commit rape to inflict suffering because it does. Why should it fall first on women to deal with this. The crime of rape is real emotionally for most of us. You can't cause enlightenment by reducing the severity of the crime, because that gives a green light to unenlightened men. Enlightenment for women will be had by the by the full expression of rage and grief for oneself as a victim. There would be no intention to violate women if the violation were not possible in the first place. We know what being violated is because we have all experienced it long ago in childhood. If you want to feel free from that deal with the origin of the pain. Don't give a pass to those who act out their suffering by trying to inflict pain on others. That is not permitted and must be stopped as best it can be.

Rapists rape cause they want free pu££y without working for it. Women always expect to get paid for sex, whether through commitment and marriage or through cash. Sex is a resource females own. Sex is the price women are willing to pay to get a relationship, which is what they really want. So basically rape is a form of theft, you're stealing sex.

 

[Moonbeam]

Is the path to that empowerment by letting violaters be treated lightly? As for all cases, I advocate just punishment and respect for the dignity of the violator, but her words seem to attempt to invalidate the trauma rather than lead people beyond it.

A woman accused a Zen master of being the father of her illegitimate child. The girls parents presented it to the Zen master demanding he take care of it. He said, "Is that so!" and took the child to raise. Time pasted and the girl became overcome by guilt and confessed to her parents who her lover was. The parents went to the Zen master and asked for the child back. He said, "Is that so!" and gave the child back. No trauma, no need to get beyond it.

No evil can befall a good person, in this life or the next. A Sufi saying.

To reduce the crime of rape to reduce the extent of the trauma, is to my mind ass-backward forgiveness. That, real forgiveness, must come from within, via self understanding and the expression of real grief for what one has experienced.

 

[Moonbeam]

Rapists rape cause they want free pu££y without working for it. Women always expect to get paid for sex, whether through commitment and marriage or through cash. Sex is a resource females own. Sex is the price women are willing to lay to get a relationship, which is what they really want. So basically rape is a form of theft, you're stealing sex.

Utter rubbish. Sex is the cherry that tops the Ice Cream Sunday of love. It is a commodity for those who fear being real. My condolences to you for the darkness in which you feel you have to live. Did you really think you can have great joy without the risking great pain? You will always be rejected if you reject your own self.

 

[1sikbITCH]

Nobody wants to rape an ugly mutant like me.

Go to prison = problem solved.

 

[interchange]

A woman accused a Zen master of being the father of her illegitimate child. The girls parents presented it to the Zen master demanding he take care of it. He said, "Is that so!" and took the child to raise. Time pasted and the girl became overcome by guilt and confessed to her parents who her lover was. The parents went to the Zen master and asked for the child back. He said, "Is that so!" and gave the child back. No trauma, no need to get beyond it.

No evil can befall a good person, in this life or the next. A Sufi saying.

To reduce the crime of rape to reduce the extent of the trauma, is to my mind ass-backward forgiveness. That, real forgiveness, must come from within, via self understanding and the expression of real grief for what one has experienced.

By "beyond trauma" I did not necessarily mean through it.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Rapists rape cause they want free pu££y without working for it. Women always expect to get paid for sex, whether through commitment and marriage or through cash. Sex is a resource females own. Sex is the price women are willing to pay to get a relationship, which is what they really want. So basically rape is a form of theft, you're stealing sex.

and the dumbfuck meter just blew up.

 

[glenn1]

No need for feminists to scream it at her. She is trivializing rape. Rape is such a heinous and violent crime because it is often extremely traumatic to a person's sense of integrity, autonomy, and safety.

So heinous that numerous places punish it by honor killing the woman involved.

 

[brycejones]

So heinous that numerous places punish it by honor killing the woman involved.

Yes and that has what to do with this thread?

 

[zinfamous]

Oh fuck me sideways, an official, proud, incel in our midst.

I'm gonna pull up a chair and try to learn some shit. ....I hope.

 

[zinfamous]

I've seen her speeches and her mind is in tip top shape. She likely always had these opinions. It's not okay to smear someone and call them mad just cause you don't approve of their opinion.

what the fuck--since when?

The mere possession of an opinion is no unique, wonderful thing. Get the fuck out of here with that snowflake nonsense.

If a person has an idiotic idea, that idiotic idea will be addressed. If the person continues with this idea, that person is the idiot.

Or mad. Little difference, really.