blankslate
Diamond Member
- Jun 16, 2008
- 8,796
- 572
- 126
http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/roderickscott.asp"Is it true that Roderick Scott, a black man, shot and killed a white teenager, Christopher Corvine, who along with other teens was breaking into cars and was acquitted?
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/crime/roderickscott.asp#IlVs6Bkxw2HSDv6w.99"
Curious, how do you believe those cases are similar?
They're not similar, he's just mad that people weren't outraged over this shooting when there were three teenagers against the shooter whereas there only one person against the shooter in the Florida case.
Also Mr. Scott told the 3 that he had a gun. I doubt Mr. Zimmerman actually told the the person he shot that he had a gun.
Those three were also testing the locks of cars they passed by. Whereas so far as we know Mr. Zimmerman never said he saw Trayvon Martin walking up to houses and trying doorknobs.
Using those two shootings with very different circumstances as some sort of proof of bias is insane and/or stupid.
Now in a hypothetical situation where the circumstances are the same as the Martin/Zimmerman case, but it's a black armed neighborhood watch man who gets out of a car to follow a white/hispanic teen walking down a sidewalk after being told that the police were on their way and somehow a fight breaks out then I would want to see the shooter put in jail as well.
Here's a clue. It's the circumstances that were outrageous.
....
Last edited: