Turin39789
Lifer
- Nov 21, 2000
- 12,218
- 8
- 81
Originally posted by: Rhonda the Sly
Why is everyone getting all bent out of shape over this?
I am curious why these people chose to conceive themselves and run a solid risk of having the "unfavored" gender over adoption. Well, okay, I'm not really curious but I would have preferred it if they took that route as it seems much better overall for most everyone. Nutty parent gets the gender they want, child gets a parent, and the system has one less child in it. They're wasting years of their life creating children they just don't care for which seems unproductive.
Time, money, and love aren't infinite. At least, even if they were, you wouldn't be able to experience anything but the potentiality of that yourself. Having any number of unwanted children takes away time, money, and love from the child you do want. It takes time to build a strong bond between family members unless you a) have some sort of obsession or b) love people because of their status (rich, good looking, family, etc). For maximum simplicity and a minimum error rate it would be easiest to just adopt.
A bit over the top, no? As long as their not depriving their children of the basic necessities (food, water, shelter), they're good as cream pie in the eyes of the law. It would be nice if they showered their children with love and affection but the law can't define, regulate, or monitor that.[/quote]I don't want kids at all so perhaps I'm not qualified to comment, but the attitude these women have to their non-preferenced-gender children seems almost criminal.
Originally posted by: WhipperSnapper
Maybe these women need to find women who had girls and who wanted boys and then exchange them.
Originally posted by: zephyrprime
I don't think this sort of thinking is widespread yet but it is an indication of the reverse sexism that is growing in western societies.
Originally posted by: Modelworks
I would like to say I am shocked but I am not. After seeing people claiming a newborn isn't a person and that infanticide is okay I just shake my head in disgust. These are the same people that if left unchecked will have children that are born premature killed because they are not perfect. How is it we require a license for things like driving a car but nothing for having a child, as if anyone can do it just fine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...ortion_and_infanticide
In 2005, 90 million women were estimated to be missing in seven Asian countries alone, apparently due to sex-selective abortion
damn what is wrong with people.
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: zephyrprime
I don't think this sort of thinking is widespread yet but it is an indication of the reverse sexism that is growing in western societies.
The article alludes to the reason for the preference being that boys are considered the defective sex now. It cites boys going to college less and doing worse in school. Of course, the main reasons cited by the nutwads in the article was mostly some sort of mother daughter tea party fantasy.
I can't imagine not loving the child no matter what. When I see some of the comments from the women, all I can say is "wow, just wow". Sad really, because I'm sure their sentiment won't be lost on their children of the "wrong" gender.
Love and nurture your children and it doesn't matter what gender they are. The bond begins at their birth. I have a daughter and a son, neither is more or less precious to me.
These women are mental defectives. They don't even want a child. What happens when they have a tomboy who doesn't live up to their retarded fantasies? Do they drown her in a bathtub with the rest of their unwanted spawn? They should be sterilized.
what i couldn't believe most was that in the article, one woman was considering an abortion just because she wasn't having a daughter. WTF!!!!! you (presumably) have a healthy child in you and you want to get rid of him because he's not a girl?
Hey, that's the price you have to pay when you accept the pro "choice" viewpoint. After all, right up until that baby pops out the vag, the mother has a right to do whatever the hell she wants with it, right? Who are you to tell a woman what to do with her womb? At least that's what the argument is. Whether she aborts the baby because she's handicapped with no job, no insurance, and no family to support her, or she's just a vain emotional nutcase who doesn't want a baby with brown eyes, it's still her CHOICE. This is just the natural result of a combination of the pro-choice movement, and the entitlement society.
I'm not specifically referring to you, fenixgoon, I'm using you in the third person plural form.