OILFIELDTRASH
Lifer
- May 13, 2009
- 12,333
- 612
- 126
If people want to pay a grand for a single GPU then let them. Hopefully it keeps the discrete market alive and well so I can get my bang for the buck cards cheap.
in previous generations halo gpus didn't bring as much bang for the buck as say the midrange but it's ok for the price to performance to drop some as they were halo cards you pay a bit more to have a card of that status . The 7970 was one such card and even though it was bit worse it made up for it with it's amazing ability to overclock and it's ability to PAY for it self over some months . Titan offers only one of those benefits yet the price to performance of last generation's halo cards are literally HALVED . The halo rule no longer applies to Titan becasue it's not a freaking halo card. halo cards have the same or better price to perf than the last gens halo cards NOT HALF
I just can't comprehend how people think a 500mm2 chip is going to miraculously generate no heat whatsoever. There is not a snowballs chance in GPU heat producing hell that this thing will OC to the same clock speeds as the gtx680 unless the cooler is some ridiculous marvel of engineering.
...but that's not the same as saying the current price is acceptable.
Don't attempt the strawman argument there please. I didn't say anyone would not love to pay less, but that's not the same as saying the current price is acceptable.
Then don't buy it. And when the 7970 GHz get stomped in every review just take solace in the fact that they get better price/performance.
There were tons of happy 460 and 6850 owners, they had much better price performance.. There is nothing wrong with this segment or the people who enjoy it!
Welcome to 28nm though, the 7970 and 680 were both mid-range and their price doubled, I see lots of people who bought them complaining in this thread. Why is it ok for mid-range 28nm performance to double in cost, but not halo cards? Heck the halo didn't even double, and still you complain? Come on now! :whiste:
What makes a price "acceptable"?![]()
How about we compare it to the current fastest single GPU and go with price/perf? That way we can arrive at a number that's "acceptable".
Simple eh![]()
This is a ridiculous argument. HD 7970 and GTX 680 were not mid range cards by virtue of the fact that for over one year they were the highest end single GPU both AMD and Nvidia could produce. In fact as of this post they still are. They were also priced at the historic high-end price of $500 - $550. Titan offers a similar ~37%-42% performance increase as the GTX 680 and HD 7970 offered over their respective predecessors. Yet it is rumoured to cost $900.
Wow, why are we even here there is only one company worth discussing and they give away free money!
Oh right, some of us use our PC's for entertainment and actually get a weekly paycheck.
Titan was not meant to be compared to other cards on a value/performance basis, it is a limited edition card for those who do not care about value/performance, but want the fastest, best single GPU made. Many high end products are also characterized by the diminishing returns principle where you pay more to get relatively less for the products market niche. Is that so hard to understand? Jeezus F. Christ.This is a ridiculous argument. HD 7970 and GTX 680 were not mid range cards by virtue of the fact that for over one year they were the highest end single GPU both AMD and Nvidia could produce. In fact as of this post they still are. They were also priced at the historic high-end price of $500 - $550. Titan offers a similar ~37%-42% performance increase as the GTX 680 and HD 7970 offered over their respective predecessors. Yet it is rumoured to cost $900.
You don't work Balla you stay at home with your kid while your women work!
Argument? What exactly are we arguing over?
If you couldn't figure out a 20-30% increase in performance after a full node shrink was mid-range generational gains than there is really nothing for us to "argue" about.
How about we compare it to the current fastest single GPU and go with price/perf? That way we can arrive at a number that's "acceptable".
Simple eh![]()
Titan was not meant to be compared to other cards on a value/performance basis, it is a limited edition card for those who do not care about value/performance, but want the fastest, best single GPU made. Many high end products are also characterized by the diminishing returns principle where you pay more to get relatively less for the products market niche. Is that so hard to understand? Jeezus F. Christ.
ICDP, you must have sleepless nights fidgeting over why people buy Rolexes over Seikos or Timexs.![]()
The HD 7970 was 42% faster than the HD 6970, with over-clocking it rose to ~60% faster. Certainly not 20-30%, nice try with the revisionist history.
This changes what?
AMD's goalposts was considering closer than Nvidia's? lol
Anyways, even at ~60%, that's still 20% short of what stock should have done, at the very least.
Whats interesting about those numbers is that nVIDIA has managed to significantly surpass what a GCN is capable of within the same power envelope given.
Many high end products are also characterized by the diminishing returns principle where you pay more to get relatively less for the products market niche. Is that so hard to understand? Jeezus F. Christ.
