cmdrdredd
Lifer
- Dec 12, 2001
- 27,052
- 357
- 126
Also, what's the point of getting a $400+ card and not using Anti-aliasing?
Some games will be totally unplayable at 2560x1440 with AA on if played on a single GPU card no matter what card it is.
Also, what's the point of getting a $400+ card and not using Anti-aliasing?
Some games will be totally unplayable at 2560x1440 with AA on if played on a single GPU card no matter what card it is.
Yup. As you and Grooveriding have pointed out, a single GPU won't even cut it with max settings, which means compromises. In that case, getting the fastest single GPU around the price of a GTX670 for another $20-40 may be preferably. The extra overclocking headroom of the 7970 may allow it to squeeze those extra 4-5 fps which could be huge when the card is struggling.
Having said that, I see Newegg has a GTX670 for $370 after a $30 gift card. If the OP can't afford to spend > $400, this could be another option.
I didn't disregard the 670. In Post #5 I said:
"GTX670 is a good card, but in this case HD7970 series is superior to GTX670 at 2560x1440/1600."
Also, what's the point of getting a $400+ card and not using Anti-aliasing? In that case why not get an HD7870 for $250? At this resolution, 880mhz HD7950 is cheaper and just as fast for $90 less or HD7970 1000-1100mhz is faster for $20-40 more. If the OP only wants the 670, no problem. I don't see how this thread is any different than if a person asked if FX8120/8150 is good enough for gaming. Yes, it is, but is it as good as the alternative?
I have said card, and in games where 4x incurs too much of a performance penalty, I really do not feel like I am missing out on anything with AA not enabled.
I get that and the same would apply to GTX680 and 7970. Having said that, when a quiet, aftermarket 1000mhz HD7970 is going for $420 with 3 free games, 3GB of VRAM (bonus for GTA V and SKYRIM Mods), and it has better overclocking headroom than the GTX670, I am sorry but the 670 makes no sense. It made a lot of sense for 2-3 months, but not anymore. I don't see how buying a slower card when spending $400+ is a valid reason to choose the 670 right now. With aftermarket 7970s dropping to $420, GTX670 needs a price cut because really a 1000mhz 7970 is more of a competitor to the 680 not the 670. And the fact that 7970 pays for itself with bitcoin mining is an extra extra special bonus.
Has it ever occured to you that some just prefer Nvidia cards? :biggrin:
Another thing, some may wanna go SLI later on. It is a known fact Crossfire has much more microstuttering and issues VS SLI.
I have said card, and in games where 4x incurs too much of a performance penalty, I really do not feel like I am missing out on anything with AA not enabled.
Russian he didn't ask about comparisons to the hd7970. He specifically asked about the gtx670. And when you're linking games that are scoring ~45fps with 4xAA enabled no matter what card you're talking about, 4xAA should be disabled.
But anyways, back to the OP's question, I have the gtx670 and yes it's good for 2560x1440.
OP here, thanks for the input guys, I think my question has been answered
Continue slapping each other about as you wish
This isn't 1998, I need AA for games to not look terrible.
At 2056x1440 it isnt that bad to turn aa off.
Ya, I get that. But the argument of turning down settings is almost a circular reference. Why not get an HD7870 for $250 and turn down settings and save $120-150 over the 670? It goes both ways. A faster card is a faster card and when we are talking about 20% performance edge for $20-40 extra, I think it's material.
This isn't 1998, I need AA for games to not look terrible.
I am seeing 10 percent faster with x4 AA.
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/grafikkarten/2012/test-amd-radeon-hd-7970-ghz-edition/4/