- May 15, 2005
- 1,134
- 0
- 0
http://theinq.net/default.aspx?article=37697
If true then I am disappointed. I expect it to top 7900GTX.
If true then I am disappointed. I expect it to top 7900GTX.
We are sure Graphzilla can do it but we thought we should give it a pinch before it finally gets its finger out.
Originally posted by: Cookie Monster
For comaprison what does the X1950 pro/7600GT/X1650XT get in 3dmark06?
Originally posted by: Stumps
Originally posted by: Cookie Monster
For comaprison what does the X1950 pro/7600GT/X1650XT get in 3dmark06?
I get 4800+,
A64 3000+@2.87Ghz
GA-K8NS PRO
1GB DDR400 7-2-2-2.5 2T
Sapphire X1950Pro 512mb AGP
nVidia.Originally posted by: schneiderguy
We are sure Graphzilla can do it but we thought we should give it a pinch before it finally gets its finger out.
Who the hell is graphzilla![]()
It looks even worse for 8600 hopefulsOriginally posted by: Matt2
Originally posted by: Stumps
Originally posted by: Cookie Monster
For comaprison what does the X1950 pro/7600GT/X1650XT get in 3dmark06?
I get 4800+,
A64 3000+@2.87Ghz
GA-K8NS PRO
1GB DDR400 7-2-2-2.5 2T
Sapphire X1950Pro 512mb AGP
Yikes. If true, this is bad news for 8600 hopefuls.
Originally posted by: SickBeast
IMO the 128-bit memory controller will cripple this card, no matter how good the GPU core is.
Originally posted by: StrangerGuy
4500 points...which resolution?
my fastest PC gets 4500 'ish in 06Originally posted by: Cookie Monster
For comaprison what does the X1950 pro/7600GT/X1650XT get in 3dmark06?
Originally posted by: Avalon
They didn't say which 8600![]()
