• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Discussion Geekbench 6 released and calibrated against Core i7-12700

Page 43 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I

igor_kavinski

Lifer
Last edited:
Quietly downloading binaries to your PC sounds like a security hole that will certainly be exploited. This soft of translation should not happen "in the labs", but on host PC - like "compiling shaders", if it's done in generic way for all software then it's PROBABLY ok, but for benchmarks really that should not happen otherwise results are not like for like.
 
Jan Olšan said:
Seems very consistently (not just some subtests) slower than that >4000 result so more than SME may be involved.
Ironically even 3550 would be good, not to mention 4000
Click to expand...
This one clocks up to 4.7GHz. The Extreme version clocks up to 5Ghz, that should do around 3600-3700 without sme.
 
Oh, right. For some reason I just saw that Extreme there too. Not a huge fan of that Elite Extreme naming exactly for these reasons, but at least it's not 9950X3D2. OTOH, the ridiculous Snapdragon numeric codes ARE worse than it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top