Gays Vote GOP in Record Numbers

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,476
19,976
146
Interesting news. It seems that even some of the party base jumped ship. Maybe some segments realize when they are being pandered to but not helped.

With Focus on Economy, GOP Gains Traction Among Gay Voters
Published November 08, 2010| FoxNews.com

The Republican Party drew more gay voters in Tuesday's midterm elections than it has in 10 years, according to Fox News national exit polls.

The data shows that 31 percent of self-identified gays voted for the GOP, an uptick from 19 percent in 2008 and 24 percent in 2006 and 2004.

The 12-point uptick could be a reflection of the gay community's disappointment in President Obama's record on gay rights. While Obama says he supports ending the ban on gays openly serving in the military, his administration is challenging attempts by a federal judge to impose an end to the "don't ask, don't tell" policy.

Democrats have also failed to pass a law making it illegal for employers to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation and to repeal a 1996 law that defines marriage as between a man and a woman.

But one prominent gay conservative told FoxNews.com that the increase shows that issues among gay voters aren't just social.

Economics is at the "forefront" of everyone's mind, said Jimmy LaSalvia, executive director of GOProud, a conservative gay advocacy group.

He argued that Republicans repelled gay voters in past election cycles by running on divisive social issues.

"I think you saw this week and this year a campaign that was run on issues of importance to the vast majority of Americans, including gay Americans and the message of the Tea Party resonates with everyone."

Gays made up just 3 percent of the electorate this year, the same percentage in the last three election cycles. They made up 4 percent of the electorate in 2000 and 1998 when Republicans drew similar levels of support.

LaSalvia said the numbers mean that only 1 percent of the voting population this year is gay and supports Republicans. But that 1 percent makes a difference, he said.

"In a gajillion races out there, that we still don't know the outcome of some, there are paper-thin margins," he said, adding that he would love to have a race-by-race breakdown of where gay voters made the difference.

Log Cabin Republicans, a gay conservative group, welcomed the new Republican majority and noted that it had endorsed 12 winners.

"Log Cabin Republicans are proud to have helped usher in a 112th Congress charged with enabling economic growth and restraining runaway government spending," R. Clarke Cooper, the group's executive director, said in a written statement. "We look forward to working with new and returning Republican allies to remove any barriers to equal employment access and job growth. We will also work to secure tax reform which will benefit Americans' personal budgets while stimulating market growth."

The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force saw the midterm elections as a mixed bag. The group cited the GOP capture of the House and several statehouses as a challenge for advancing gay rights legislation but noted the victories of several governor candidates who support gay marriage. The group also noted that there will be four openly gay members in the next Congress.

"We'll cut to the chase: The shift in the balance of power will very likely slow advancement of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender rights legislation in Congress," the group's executive director, Rea Carey, said in a written statement.

"Does this mean a blockade on LGBT rights? Not if we can help it," she said. "Fact is, our community has always had to fight -- and fight hard -- for equality. This is nothing new to us."

But LaSalvia called it "patronizing" to vote purely on one's demographic identity rather than push issues that will benefit everybody. He cited the current tax debate, including a possible rise in the estate tax, as an area where gay couples, like others, would benefit from the GOP-proposed extension.

"Really, we see it as a hugely discriminatory tax because there is no marriage exemption for gay couples so a couple that has built a business or owns a home together," particularly couples in more expensive urban areas, would lose out if the estate tax goes back up.

"We're just like everybody else trying to keep our jobs and feed our families and stay safe from the terrorists," he said.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
it's kinda like choosing between someone who's going to stab you in the back while hugging you versus someone who's just going to run up and kick you in the balls.
 

Elias824

Golden Member
Mar 13, 2007
1,100
0
76
We need something to say that were gay and republican.
pink elephant floats into the room*

Also this isnt surprising, gay marriage isnt the end all be all politics for gay people, im sure most of them would rather have a good economy then legal gay marriage. Besides its not like the dems have any real plans of doing anything pro gay in the near future anyways.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Hopefully the GOP will shift towards the philosophy of government reducing both social and economic restrictions. This will be a winner every time.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Hopefully the GOP will shift towards the philosophy of government reducing both social and economic restrictions. This will be a winner every time.

Forgive me if I won't hold my breath waiting for either of those to happen.
 

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
Hopefully the GOP will shift towards the philosophy of government reducing both social and economic restrictions. This will be a winner every time.

If you reducing economic restrictions you mean deregulating everything and letting the free market take care of itself because business leaders are so altruistic and would never do anything out of self serving greed, I think that you are way off the mark.

We tried that in the 80s and got the S&L scandals and collapses along with a housing bubble. We tried it again in the early part of this decade and surprising got the same exact results.

What's that saying about doing the same thing over and over but expecting a different result?
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Hopefully the GOP will shift towards the philosophy of government reducing both social and economic restrictions. This will be a winner every time.

Forgive me if I won't hold my breath waiting for either of those to happen.

Agreed, this would be a winner every time - except in Republican primaries. There's a name for people holding their breath waiting for Republicans to live up to their philosophy of limited government - dead people. (Luckily in Chicago and Philly they can still vote!) Pubbies know they merely have to be more fiscally conservative than the Dems because there is little choice for fiscal conservatism.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
Increased numbers of Gays get chumped, vote against their own self interest like much of the rest of the country?

Why am I not surprised?
 

nick1985

Lifer
Dec 29, 2002
27,153
6
81
Just think about what would happen if the GOP was for gay marriage and a repeal of DADT. Retarded social issue stances like this often submarine the party.

Let people do what they want with their bodies and their sex lives, and focus on the economy and the Constitution. Win Win.
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
688
126
Just think about what would happen if the GOP was for gay marriage and a repeal of DADT. Retarded social issue stances like this often submarine the party.

Let people do what they want with their bodies and their sex lives, and focus on the economy and the Constitution. Win Win.

Agreed. Tell the fundies to go off and form their own wingnut party.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
Just think about what would happen if the GOP was for gay marriage and a repeal of DADT. Retarded social issue stances like this often submarine the party.

Let people do what they want with their bodies and their sex lives, and focus on the economy and the Constitution. Win Win.

Yeh, but being retarded isn't selective, it's a generalized condition...
 

Patranus

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2007
9,280
0
0
Just think about what would happen if the GOP was for gay marriage and a repeal of DADT. Retarded social issue stances like this often submarine the party.

Let people do what they want with their bodies and their sex lives, and focus on the economy and the Constitution. Win Win.



.....Republicans were the ones who filed the law suit to get DADT thrown out.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
it's kinda like choosing between someone who's going to stab you in the back while hugging you versus someone who's just going to run up and kick you in the balls.

No, it's not. It's more like between someone who just gives you a kiss good night after getting you to buy them dinner hinting at a blowjob, or someone who kicks you in the balls.

The Dems have not done enough for gays. They are clearly better for gays than the Republicans - including on economic issues.
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
I dont believe this is an embrace of conservatism over libralism as far as the gay community is concerned.

Rather this seems to me that the economy (and voter anger over the economy) trumps all other issues at the moment.

imho of course...

edit: minor caveat of course...this is a FOX news poll we are discussing...it could be just complete bullshit.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
I think Craig just enjoys getting kicked in the balls. That would explain his perpetual defense of the Democrats.
 

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,505
2
0
This will not be repeated in 2012 and beyond if the GOP resumes throwing the Bible at everyone, which they're almost guaranteed to do when they get more power.