• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

gay people are everyday people?!?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: aidanjm

This woman got it right.
But Patricia Raezler, 55, a member of Parents Promoting Innocence in Bloomfield Hills, which supports Troy parents in the poster issue, said the school shouldn't be promoting sexuality of any kind.

This guy got it wrong
But, Cruz isn't backing down, saying the posters promote a sexual lifestyle that is against Judeo-Christian beliefs.

If the Cruz guy really wanted to make a good argument, all he needed to say was, "You promote a policy of abstinence therefore these posters have no place in the school." He made the mistake of taking a religious standpoint on the matter. It is much harder to argue with pure unopinionated logic than with somebody's personal religious views.
 
Originally posted by: ahurtt
Originally posted by: aidanjm

This woman got it right.
But Patricia Raezler, 55, a member of Parents Promoting Innocence in Bloomfield Hills, which supports Troy parents in the poster issue, said the school shouldn't be promoting sexuality of any kind.

This guy got it wrong
But, Cruz isn't backing down, saying the posters promote a sexual lifestyle that is against Judeo-Christian beliefs.

If the Cruz guy really wanted to make a good argument, all he needed to say was, "You promote a policy of abstinence therefore these posters have no place in the school." He made the mistake of taking a religious standpoint on the matter. It is much harder to argue with pure unopinionated logic than with somebody's personal religious views.

I agree. Let's keep people's religious views out of schools. Religious views need to be expressed at home and in church, but not in schools.
 
quote:
Originally posted by: Infohawk

quote:
Originally posted by: bamacre
Do you think we should teach kids how to drink responsibly?


Sure.

I think I see your problem. You think when people teach safe sex, they are saying, "go out and have sex with a condom right now." LOL. That is not how it works. Same goes for kids the risk of heavy drinking. Doesn't mean you give them a glass of wine to show them what is a good amount.
 
Originally posted by: Infohawk
quote:
Originally posted by: Infohawk

quote:
Originally posted by: bamacre
Do you think we should teach kids how to drink responsibly?


Sure.

I think I see your problem. You think when people teach safe sex, they are saying, "go out and have sex with a condom right now." LOL. That is not how it works. Same goes for kids the risk of heavy drinking. Doesn't mean you give them a glass of wine to show them what is a good amount.

I think I see your problem. You don't like my sig. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: bamacre
Do you think we should teach kids how to drink responsibly?

Sure.

wtf? The difference between sex ed and this is that alcohol is ILLEGAL. Should we teach kids how to smoke pot responsibly too? Crack? LSD? Heroin? Where does it end?
 
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: ahurtt
Originally posted by: aidanjm

This woman got it right.
But Patricia Raezler, 55, a member of Parents Promoting Innocence in Bloomfield Hills, which supports Troy parents in the poster issue, said the school shouldn't be promoting sexuality of any kind.

This guy got it wrong
But, Cruz isn't backing down, saying the posters promote a sexual lifestyle that is against Judeo-Christian beliefs.

If the Cruz guy really wanted to make a good argument, all he needed to say was, "You promote a policy of abstinence therefore these posters have no place in the school." He made the mistake of taking a religious standpoint on the matter. It is much harder to argue with pure unopinionated logic than with somebody's personal religious views.

I agree. Let's keep people's religious views out of schools. Religious views need to be expressed at home and in church, but not in schools.


I don't think religion should be taught in school. But if the school is teaching something that goes against your beliefs (ie abortion is ok), as a student, you should be able to be excused from that part of the curriculum.


Link

In northeastern Kentucky, hundreds of students have defied the Ashland-Boyd County school district's "mandatory anti-harassment workshops" required by an agreement with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) that also allows the Gay-Straight Alliance student group to meet in school buildings. Some 324 students did not come to school the day the tolerance training video was shown, and hundreds more refused to watch it.

The ACLU has threatened to seek a court order to enforce attendance.



What the ACLU is doing here is complete BS. Stuff like this makes me wonder whether "tolerance" is truly their goal.

He would never put up a pro-Christian tolerance poster with the goal of making sure people are tolerant of Christianity, his goal would be to convert everyone from their "wrong" beliefs.
So a pro-Christian poster is for conversion, but a pro-gay poster is for tolerance. Got it.
 
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: ahurtt
Originally posted by: aidanjm

This woman got it right.
But Patricia Raezler, 55, a member of Parents Promoting Innocence in Bloomfield Hills, which supports Troy parents in the poster issue, said the school shouldn't be promoting sexuality of any kind.

This guy got it wrong
But, Cruz isn't backing down, saying the posters promote a sexual lifestyle that is against Judeo-Christian beliefs.

If the Cruz guy really wanted to make a good argument, all he needed to say was, "You promote a policy of abstinence therefore these posters have no place in the school." He made the mistake of taking a religious standpoint on the matter. It is much harder to argue with pure unopinionated logic than with somebody's personal religious views.

I agree. Let's keep people's religious views out of schools. Religious views need to be expressed at home and in church, but not in schools.


I don't think religion should be taught in school. But if the school is teaching something that goes against your beliefs (ie abortion is ok), as a student, you should be able to be excused from that part of the curriculum.

Agreed.
 
Originally posted by: bamacre

I think I see your problem. You don't like my sig. 🙂

I don't care what you put in your sig, frankly. If you think I support giving hard alcohol to 5th graders, you are kidding yourself. Teenagers are kids and drinking and driving is a big problem in that population. I also support drug education. Do you want to put that in your sig too? 😛 I will just assume you don't really understand what modern sex ed is all about.
 
Originally posted by: ahurtt
I think it is sending more than a little bit of a mixed message to promote abstinence but then to promote tolerance OR intolerance of homosexuals. . .either way. You are saying out of one side of your mouth "Don't have sex at all with anybody" and then out the other side of your mouth saying "Be tolerant of people who have homosexual sex."

The poster is in a school, and in fact, most of the gay kids in schools are probably virgins. And yet they are still bullied or teased for being gay. The bullying occurs, whether a homosexual individual is a slut/ whore or entirely celibate. Homophobes don't take the time to enquire about the gay person's sex life before they start the homophobic abuse.

Originally posted by: ahurtt
The message should be the same for everybody. If you promote abstinence, then apply it to everybody. If your aim is for nobody to have sex, then it shouldn't matter if you are tolerant or intolerant of homosexuals.

So all they gay kids at school should just STFU when they are bullied for being gay? No-one is teased for being heterosexual, hence the lack of posters saying "Straight people are everyday people".

Originally posted by: ahurtt
No sex. Period.

Yes, and gay kids continue to be homosexual, even when they are abstinent. And they continue to be bullied. Hence the need for "tolerance" messages.

Originally posted by: ahurtt
To me it's exactly the same as promoting abstinence then handing out free condoms. It's two-faced and confusing.

It's only confusing because you are stupid. 😉

Originally posted by: ahurtt
Abstinence is not, as you say, a form of sexuality.

Yes, abstinence is a form of sexuality. Abstinent people make decisions about their sexual activities. Typically they continue to masturbate, while choosing not to engage in sexual activities with other people.

Originally posted by: ahurtt
It is exactly the opposite. It is lack of sexuality.

Celibate or abstinent individuals do not lack sexuality. They still have sexual attractions to other people of the opposite (or same) gender as themselves. They still need to find some way of dealing with their sexual attractions. I would guess that most abstinent or celibate people engage in masturbation. More to the point, abstinence education is morality education, or religious-based education. (It is not science-based education, as there is no evidence that it leads to healthier outcomes).

Originally posted by: ahurtt
Therefore, if you are going to promote no sex, then whether or not you are pro or anti homosexual should be irrelevant. So as I see it, it is equally wrong in this case to promote any view on homosexuality at all if your general view is abstinence is king.

And so what do you say to gay kids who are bullied in schools? Tough sh1t?
The posters are not about being "pro homosexual" - they are about teaching people to respect other people who are different. This is socialisation 101 - treat people the way you want to be treated yourself. Don't bully people or attack people because they are different. Etc.
 
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: aidanjm
A question: why is it acceptable to promote abstinence in schools (abstinence is a particular take on sexual morality) but not acceptable to promote anti-homophobia messages in schools? One of the parents in this article says schools "shouldn't be promoting sexuality of any kind" -- but of course, promotion of abstinence is certainly a promotion of a certain form of sexuality and a certain form of sexual morality. Why the double standard? I would argue that this poster is not really about sex, per se, and more a call for people to treat gay people decently. That should not be controversial, es even the xian religions are generally seen as opposing bigotry (love the sinner, hate the sin, etc.) Whereas abstinence education is definitately promoting a certain kind of sexuality and sexual morality in schools to a "captive audience".

So using your logic, agnosticism and Atheism are a form of religion and religious morality?

Yes, that has nothing to do with your so-called point, but I'm trying to understand your logic regarding the "non".

CsG

Abstinence is promoted based on the belief that it is morally undesirable or bad to have sex outside of wedlock. The belief that sex outside of marriage is morally bad is obviously a key aspect of Christian fundamentalist sexual morality. Promoting abstinence is obviously promoting a certain form of sexual morality (a form of sexual morality that many people would say is absurd, foolish.)

(the motivation underlying abstinence education must be considered primarily a religious motivation, as there is no convincing scientific evidence that abstinence education promotes healthier outcomes. Actually, relatively recently emerging evidence indicates kids who receive abstinence education are more likely to enage in risky sexual practices over the long term).

It is possible to be without a belief in a deity or deities, however it is not possible to be without a sexuality or sexual nature. Celibate people (who are sexually mature - i.e., teenagers and older) have a sexual preference and a sexual identity. Celibate people have sexual thoughts, desires, feelings - which they need to find a way of dealing with. Abstinence education in practice promotes masturbation as an alternative to sexual intercourse. Masturbation is certainly an aspect of sexuality. To suggest that abstinent people lack a sexuality, or that an abstinent lifestyle is not a form of sexuality, is absurd.

 
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: ahurtt
I think it is sending more than a little bit of a mixed message to promote abstinence but then to promote tolerance OR intolerance of homosexuals. . .either way. You are saying out of one side of your mouth "Don't have sex at all with anybody" and then out the other side of your mouth saying "Be tolerant of people who have homosexual sex."

The poster is in a school, and in fact, most of the gay kids in schools are probably virgins. And yet they are still bullied or teased for being gay. The bullying occurs, whether a homosexual individual is a slut/ whore or entirely celibate. Homophobes don't take the time to enquire about the gay person's sex life before they start the homophobic abuse.

Originally posted by: ahurtt
The message should be the same for everybody. If you promote abstinence, then apply it to everybody. If your aim is for nobody to have sex, then it shouldn't matter if you are tolerant or intolerant of homosexuals.

So all they gay kids at school should just STFU when they are bullied for being gay? No-one is teased for being heterosexual, hence the lack of posters saying "Straight people are everyday people".

Originally posted by: ahurtt
No sex. Period.

Yes, and gay kids continue to be homosexual, even when they are abstinent. And they continue to be bullied. Hence the need for "tolerance" messages.

Originally posted by: ahurtt
To me it's exactly the same as promoting abstinence then handing out free condoms. It's two-faced and confusing.

It's only confusing because you are stupid. 😉

Originally posted by: ahurtt
Abstinence is not, as you say, a form of sexuality.

Yes, abstinence is a form of sexuality. Abstinent people make decisions about their sexual activities. Typically they continue to masturbate, while choosing not to engage in sexual activities with other people.

Originally posted by: ahurtt
It is exactly the opposite. It is lack of sexuality.

Celibate or abstinent individuals do not lack sexuality. They still have sexual attractions to other people of the opposite (or same) gender as themselves. They still need to find some way of dealing with their sexual attractions. I would guess that most abstinent or celibate people engage in masturbation. More to the point, abstinence education is morality education, or religious-based education. (It is not science-based education, as there is no evidence that it leads to healthier outcomes).

Originally posted by: ahurtt
Therefore, if you are going to promote no sex, then whether or not you are pro or anti homosexual should be irrelevant. So as I see it, it is equally wrong in this case to promote any view on homosexuality at all if your general view is abstinence is king.

And so what do you say to gay kids who are bullied in schools? Tough sh1t?
The posters are not about being "pro homosexual" - they are about teaching people to respect other people who are different. This is socialisation 101 - treat people the way you want to be treated yourself. Don't bully people or attack people because they are different. Etc.


You make some good points here. But do we need to have posters for everyone that get's teased at school. You know, short kids, fat kids, kids with big ears, goofy hair, kids who are just unattractive. Kids with weird last names.

That's a lot of fvcking posters.

Ordinarily, I'd say suck it up. Be a man.


"The Bulockavitz's are everyday people."

:roll:
 
Originally posted by: bamacre
do we need to have posters for everyone that get's teased at school. You know, short kids, fat kids, kids with big ears, goofy hair, kids who are just unattractive. Kids with weird last names.

That's a lot of fvcking posters.

There should be anti-bullying programs in all schools. It is not acceptable for kids to be bullied at school for any reason - race, hair, size of ears, anything. Schools are the legal guardians of children, the school has a legal (not to mention moral) obligation to provide a safe environment for children. No parent would leave their child at school each day if they thought their child was going to be in physical or psychological danger in the school environment. School must be an environment where children are able to concentrate on their studies, it should not be an environment where children are terrorized by other children or teachers.

Originally posted by: bamacre
Ordinarily, I'd say suck it up. Be a man.

And should the lesbians be men, too? That advice isn't good enough, in my opinion. It is the school's legal obligation to provide a safe environment for all children. That means the school needs to implement programs to deal with and prevent bullying.

Originally posted by: bamacre
"The Bulockavitz's are everyday people."
:roll:

There is a reservoir of hatred against gays in our society, that goes far beyond any hostility people may have towards those with big ears or weird hair. There is also a great deal of misunderstanding among the community re: what gay people are like. Hence the need for the "Gay people are everyday people" posters.
 
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: bamacre
Do you think we should teach kids how to drink responsibly?

Sure.

wtf? The difference between sex ed and this is that alcohol is ILLEGAL. Should we teach kids how to smoke pot responsibly too? Crack? LSD? Heroin? Where does it end?


actually it would be a great idea to show these kids how to deal with drugs responsibly,
in a controleld safe enviroment, better then under a bridge somewhere.

The crack, have a field trip to the ghetto and show them people smoking rock and shooting up,
then there is no mystery surrounding these things.

I can't understand your view on education for some things and promoting ignorance on others.

They should have real sex ed too....a lot more into the psychology of relationships though then the actual act...teaching children is a lot more then the three R's and parents have failed in this country in that respect.

 
It is acceptable because the religious right supports abstinence and hates gay people. It is a double standard in the sense the religious activists think that their beliefs should be promoted and that the beliefs of others should be rejected.

How does one teach abstinence anyway?
 
Originally posted by: zendari
wtf? The difference between sex ed and this is that alcohol is ILLEGAL.

It's illegal for kids to have sex in most places so I'm not sure what your point is.


Should we teach kids how to smoke pot responsibly too? Crack? LSD? Heroin? Where does it end?

I suggest you read what I wrote to bamacre:

I think I see your problem. You think when people teach safe sex, they are saying, "go out and have sex with a condom right now." LOL. That is not how it works. Same goes for kids the risk of heavy drinking. Doesn't mean you give them a glass of wine to show them what is a good amount.

If you think I support giving hard alcohol to 5th graders, you are kidding yourself. Teenagers are kids and drinking and driving is a big problem in that population. I also support drug education.
 
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: bamacre
do we need to have posters for everyone that get's teased at school. You know, short kids, fat kids, kids with big ears, goofy hair, kids who are just unattractive. Kids with weird last names.

That's a lot of fvcking posters.

There should be anti-bullying programs in all schools. It is not acceptable for kids to be bullied at school for any reason - race, hair, size of ears, anything. Schools are the legal guardians of children, the school has a legal (not to mention moral) obligation to provide a safe environment for children. No parent would leave their child at school each day if they thought their child was going to be in physical or psychological danger in the school environment. School must be an environment where children are able to concentrate on their studies, it should not be an environment where children are terrorized by other children or teachers.

Originally posted by: bamacre
Ordinarily, I'd say suck it up. Be a man.

And should the lesbians be men, too? That advice isn't good enough, in my opinion. It is the school's legal obligation to provide a safe environment for all children. That means the school needs to implement programs to deal with and prevent bullying.

Originally posted by: bamacre
"The Bulockavitz's are everyday people."
:roll:

There is a reservoir of hatred against gays in our society, that goes far beyond any hostility people may have towards those with big ears or weird hair. There is also a great deal of misunderstanding among the community re: what gay people are like. Hence the need for the "Gay people are everyday people" posters.

When I was in 4th and 5th grade, I was a small guy and was bullied by these other two kids. It sucked. But I lived. Getting bullied in school is a part of growing up. Almost every kid goes through this.

That's one problem with kids these days, they are so sheltered. Spoiled. No pain, no gain. If a kid feels bullied, they aught to go to a teacher/administrator and get the issue resolved. Gay people are just like everyone else, no different. There's no need for any special treatment.

If I ever have kids they are going to be home-schooled. The Left, with a little help from bad parenting, has totally fvcked up our eductation system. Kids are getting dumber, they are getting shot at, test scores are dropping, etc., etc..
 
Bullying should not be part of any school experience, or any other experience for that matter. This type of behavior stems from insecurity issues.
Everyone is different. But one thing is for sure. We all have the capacity to overcome our baser instincts. Aggression, Anger, Jealousy, etc...etc..
Why don't we?
Because of how we are raised, and what we are taught. That needs to change if we are to progress in society.


 
Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Bullying should not be part of any school experience, or any other experience for that matter.

Right. Not everyone has this experience, not everyone should, and just because it happened to you, it doesn't have to happen to other people.
 
Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Bullying should not be part of any school experience, or any other experience for that matter. This type of behavior stems from insecurity issues.
Everyone is different. But one thing is for sure. We all have the capacity to overcome our baser instincts. Aggression, Anger, Jealousy, etc...etc..
Why don't we?
Because of how we are raised, and what we are taught. That needs to change if we are to progress in society.

I think anybody and everybody would agree with what you said here. It is common sense. The problem is how are you going to bring it about? Almost any person would agree with what you said but the problem is people don't practice what they preach. Sometimes consciously but more often unconciously. And probably most of all, they don't APPEAR to be practicing what they preach because of the way other people perceive their actions. It sometimes never occurs to a person that somebody could interpret the meaning of their actions as other than the way they were intended. And the people who perceived the actions "incorrectly" are very rarely willing to stop and reevaluate what could be mitigating circumstances. They just jump to conclusions. It's all human nature and comes naturally. People are very fast to point out wrongs of others but are often blind to their own wrongs when they look in the mirror. We don't see how other people perceive us and so conflict arises.
 
Very interesting arguments. I think political posters have no place in a school settings. Any poster that represents and issue for a single group of people is a political poster. I have seen similar posters to this like the "It takes a village to raise a child" poster. They are just political posters that the liberal teachers union is trying to use to indoctrinate your children. Maybe the kids should just take these posters down and burn them or tare them up in protest? Students tend not to do such things unless some parent or organization plants a suggestion for such behaviour in their minds.

It is interesting that students can get expelled for wearing clothing with logos or writing on them, but a teacher can put this stupid trash up in a school. Kind of like calling the kettle black.
 
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: aidanjm
A question: why is it acceptable to promote abstinence in schools (abstinence is a particular take on sexual morality) but not acceptable to promote anti-homophobia messages in schools? One of the parents in this article says schools "shouldn't be promoting sexuality of any kind" -- but of course, promotion of abstinence is certainly a promotion of a certain form of sexuality and a certain form of sexual morality. Why the double standard? I would argue that this poster is not really about sex, per se, and more a call for people to treat gay people decently. That should not be controversial, es even the xian religions are generally seen as opposing bigotry (love the sinner, hate the sin, etc.) Whereas abstinence education is definitately promoting a certain kind of sexuality and sexual morality in schools to a "captive audience".

So using your logic, agnosticism and Atheism are a form of religion and religious morality?

Yes, that has nothing to do with your so-called point, but I'm trying to understand your logic regarding the "non".

CsG


No, because the lack of religious faith is the natural condition of a child, whereas the presense of sexuality is the same.
 
Originally posted by: zendari
Link

In northeastern Kentucky, hundreds of students have defied the Ashland-Boyd County school district's "mandatory anti-harassment workshops" required by an agreement with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) that also allows the Gay-Straight Alliance student group to meet in school buildings. Some 324 students did not come to school the day the tolerance training video was shown, and hundreds more refused to watch it.

The ACLU has threatened to seek a court order to enforce attendance.



What the ACLU is doing here is complete BS. Stuff like this makes me wonder whether "tolerance" is truly their goal.

Well, it sure as hell isn't tolerance for individual rights, liberty and personal freedom.
 
There is a reservoir of hatred against gays in our society, that goes far beyond any hostility people may have towards those with big ears or weird hair. There is also a great deal of misunderstanding among the community re: what gay people are like. Hence the need for the "Gay people are everyday people" posters
Do you have any evidence that shows that gay people are somehow bullied far more than everyone else? Seems like everyone is getting bullied.

Who are the victims of bullying?

Link

"The victim is often singled out because of his/her psychological traits more than his/her physical traits. They are likely to be shy, sensitive, anxious, insecure, have low self-esteem and lack social skills. Physical traits that tend to be picked on are being overweight, physically small, having a disability, or belonging to another race."

Doesn't mention gay anywhere.

The radical left claims this is about "tolerance" and "equal rights". What a crock. Nope, its about gay pride and identify and the need to feel "special" so they constantly shove their agenda in your face. No wonder the country is backlashing against them.
 
Originally posted by: zendari

The radical left claims this is about "tolerance" and "equal rights". What a crock. Nope, its about gay pride and identify and the need to feel "special" so they constantly shove their agenda in your face. No wonder the country is backlashing against them.

Do you get bent out of shape about St. Patrick's Day parades?
 
why would it not be about gay pride? people are sick of the backwards idiots treating them like sh1t unless your a braindead hick like them.

why would you want to be one of these people? racist, homophobic, intolerant and sadly misinformed about current events and prone to religious brainwashing.

the backlash of the american people will soon put the rednecks back in the stone age where they belong.

The people you speak of are the folks watching cable tvnews and other right wing parrot crap with their "anti-activist" agenda.

the lowest braincell count americans subscribe to these myths, and buy into it good job perpetuating their agenda.
 
Back
Top