Vic
Elite Member
Studies are not needed. A big heavy I-beamed framed solid steel car 4 wheel drum brakes and no seatbelts against one of today's lightweight unibody cars with 4 wheel discs and airbags? No contest.Originally posted by: Eli
The econoboxes of today are probably more safe than the boat cars of yesteryear. Has anybody actually done any studies? I'm not talking about new models of the old cars, either.
American vehicle safety engineering before the 70s was based off the concept that a super strong steel box was all that was needed to keep the passengers safe. And the consumers not only bought this, they believed that the much safer Japanese imports were unsafe because of the different (but now standard) design of crumble zones and cushioning the passengers.
Did you ever do the "egg drop" thing in high school? You know the one where you drop an egg from 10 feet in some type of box and try to keep the egg from breaking? Think of it this way, with the car as the box and the egg as a person. The American belief was that if you put the egg unprotected inside a strong steel box, the egg would survive. Of course, we all know today that after the box hits the ground the egg will hit the inside of the box and shatter, but that is how old American cars were built, and part of how the Japanese manufacturers broke into the US market.
You're right on one thing. It was entirely Detroit's fault. I saw this great interview with Lee Ioccoca a few years back where he even admitted it.
And yeah, hybrids will be better and cheaper someday. But that someday is not today. As for their effect of the environment, the batteries in a hybrid are an environmental disaster in the making.