ivwshane
Lifer
- May 15, 2000
- 32,227
- 14,915
- 136
Of course you do. Why pretend and just declare the Dems the new ruling party?
You sure supported that action when your team was in charge. You aren't a hypocrite are you?
Of course you do. Why pretend and just declare the Dems the new ruling party?
I was hoping for James Comey, just to watch GOP heads assplode.
Shut up traitor, Americans are having a discussion.Of course you do. Why pretend and just declare the Dems the new ruling party?
Of course you do. Why pretend and just declare the Dems the new ruling party?
Of course you do. Why pretend and just declare the Dems the new ruling party?
I think after today Biden will likely change his mind and have Garland use the full force of the DOJ on Trump and his cronies.
Okay then let’s appoint Doug Jones to be the US Attorney for DC and let him loose.Ugh. Biden promised an independent DoJ, one free to prosecute malfeasance as they see fit, showing neither favor nor malice, which is as it should be.
During the Trump administration, "88% of the pardons that he granted had some sort of personal or political connection to the former president," Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar said during the confirmation hearing on Monday.
Yes, Trump exposed a pretty significant fucking flaw in our system where essentially every check against corruption fails the second the president decides he doesn't want to follow it anymore. As the 1/6 impeachment proved the only check the president cannot dismiss with a wave of his hand is also non-functional.Garland is up for confirmation today. Among other things, on day 1, he said that "DoJ's pardon attorney is supposed to prevent corrupt pardon decisions by the President." Well that worked out great, didn't it?
Garland says DOJ's pardon attorney is supposed to prevent corrupt pardon decisions by the president
President Biden's nominee for attorney general, Judge Merrick Garland, will appear before the Senate for his confirmation hearing. Follow here for the latest.www.cnn.com
First thing that has to happen with the law, don't know if it's a constitutional issue, is that a president can in fact be indicted. I mean my god, were we just subjected to all of this shit because the DOJ has their own unofficial rule? Who made that stupid rule?Yes, Trump exposed a pretty significant fucking flaw in our system where essentially every check against corruption fails the second the president decides he doesn't want to follow it anymore. As the 1/6 impeachment proved the only check the president cannot dismiss with a wave of his hand is also non-functional.
As things are currently set up the president can commit unlimited crimes while in office without any recourse and the only thing saving us from a dictatorship is the president deciding not to implement one and the vague hope that the military and federal law enforcement would choose not to do it.
You may be shocked to learn that the source of the executive branch policy that the president can't be indicted is Nixon, haha.First thing that has to happen with the law, don't know if it's a constitutional issue, is that a president can in fact be indicted. I mean my god, were we just subjected to all of this shit because the DOJ has their own unofficial rule? Who made that stupid rule?
First thing that has to happen with the law, don't know if it's a constitutional issue, is that a president can in fact be indicted. I mean my god, were we just subjected to all of this shit because the DOJ has their own unofficial rule? Who made that stupid rule?
^^^ Yeah ...
Cruz Says DOJ 'Politicized and Weaponized' Under Obama at Garland Hearing
"Am I right in assuming you do not view your role as attorney general as being Joe Biden's wingman?" Cruz asked Garland on Monday.
Cruz Says DOJ 'Politicized and Weaponized' Under Obama at Garland Hearing
"Am I right in assuming you do not view your role as attorney general as being Joe Biden's wingman?" Cruz asked Garland on Monday.www.newsweek.com
Ummm, no, that was under Donny and MG would not be acting like Barr.
As much as I admire your good sense, I disagree with you here based on context. I see Republican politicians to be vindictive self absorbed monsters without moral compass or empathy for others. They will scream partisanship no matter how objective the prosecutor and they will turn around and use any advantage you hand them to stab you in the back. I would prefer to do unto them what they will surely do to you as the only potential deterrent they can understand. Make them eat the shit they have fed the country for decades. Crush then where you can while you can. They are nothing but a fucking bunch of whining cowards behind their blustering exteriors. They are a disease that needs to be driven to extinction by vaccine. Go partisan 200% Keep it up as long as they will not admit to who they are and what they have done.?This could very well be true, however if Biden does want to prosecute Trump era crimes you would want someone viewed as fair and non-partisan.
I have no idea what Biden wants to do here but if I wanted to go after Trump I wouldn’t appoint some fire breather because then it makes the process look like partisan revenge.
Honest question.
If you had a lifetime guaranteed job for as long as you wanted it, with virtually zero chance of being forced out, would you voluntarily take a known to be temporary job?
Honest question.
If you had a lifetime guaranteed job for as long as you wanted it, with virtually zero chance of being forced out, would you voluntarily take a known to be temporary job?
As the Attorney General of the United States?Honest question.
If you had a lifetime guaranteed job for as long as you wanted it, with virtually zero chance of being forced out, would you voluntarily take a known to be temporary job?
Quick, name a Federal Judge. Now, name the last 2 AGs. You reach a point in life where you're more focused on what you leave behind(legacy).Honest question.
If you had a lifetime guaranteed job for as long as you wanted it, with virtually zero chance of being forced out, would you voluntarily take a known to be temporary job?