Games you are looking forward to...

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: sticks435

Originally posted by: bamacre
Mafia II

Ohhh good call :thumbsup:

Yeah, I've been thinking about playing through Mafia again.

 

[sticks435]

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: sticks435

Originally posted by: bamacre
Mafia II

Ohhh good call :thumbsup:

Yeah, I've been thinking about playing through Mafia again.

I tried a couple of months ago, but quit after either the part where your supposed to murder the hooker that tell to leave town, or the ambush at the farmhouse. I forget which is further in.

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: sticks435

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: sticks435

Originally posted by: bamacre
Mafia II

Ohhh good call :thumbsup:

Yeah, I've been thinking about playing through Mafia again.

I tried a couple of months ago, but quit after either the part where your supposed to murder the hooker that tell to leave town, or the ambush at the farmhouse. I forget which is further in.

Yeah, some of those missions were rather difficult.

 

[sactoking]

This thread has inspired me. I believe my New Year's resolution will be "In 2010 I will not buy ANY game titled using the convention <name><#>".

 

[mwmorph]

Originally posted by: sactoking
This thread has inspired me. I believe my New Year's resolution will be "In 2010 I will not buy ANY game titled using the convention <name><#>".

lol I was thinking, sequesl are getting out of hand, but that resolution would limit you to about 2% of the AAA game market.

 

[Qbah]

Bayonetta, Alan Wake, Fable 3, MW2 - for my Xbox
Diablo 3 - for PC

 

[sactoking]

Originally posted by: mwmorph
lol I was thinking, sequesl are getting out of hand, but that resolution would limit you to about 2% of the AAA game market.

I am perfectly fine with that. I played Diablo. I doubt Diablo II or III bring that much more to the table. I played StarCraft. I doubt II will be much different. Sequels give developers a chance to charge you for a slightly better version of what you've already done. If I only pay for 2 or 3 games in 2010 b/c of this, that's fine; at least I know I'll be supporting developers with quasi-original ideas.

 

[damage424]

Originally posted by: Pelu

Originally posted by: damage424
Diablo III, Guild Wars 2 (no subscription needed), Dragon Age, Alan Wake

might check out BF3, Crysis 2, and Modern Warfare 2 (when price drops)

hm... GW 2 and Dragon Age.... lol i forget those too.... but crysis 2 can suck my... ^&*(

I'm prolly not going to get Crysis 2; sure as hell didn't get the first one. I'm more interested in how that thing is going to perform and look.

Definitely looking forward to GW2. And Dragon Age: Origins was pushed back for a couple of weeks and they have been working on that game for what... 5 years? I hope it'll be ready by its launch, but we'll find out I guess!

 

[StinkyPinky]

oh yeah. Mafia 2. Add me to that list. Loved the first game

 

[mwmorph]

Originally posted by: sactoking

Originally posted by: mwmorph
lol I was thinking, sequesl are getting out of hand, but that resolution would limit you to about 2% of the AAA game market.

I am perfectly fine with that. I played Diablo. I doubt Diablo II or III bring that much more to the table. I played StarCraft. I doubt II will be much different. Sequels give developers a chance to charge you for a slightly better version of what you've already done. If I only pay for 2 or 3 games in 2010 b/c of this, that's fine; at least I know I'll be supporting developers with quasi-original ideas.

Depends on the game. I know for me, Mass Effect was all about the story an I cant wait for 2 to continue it.

Diablo 3 and SC 3 that makes sense, but even in those cases, how many old school RTSes and Diablo like RPGs are there? I mean if Relic develops Homeworld 3, I would swallow it up in an instant. Those arent exactly dime a dozen games.

For some games like Modern Warfare 2 and HL2, yeah I could skip it, but stuff that is rare or maybe even genre defining, maybe not so bad an idea.

 

[TehMac]

Modern Warfare 2
BF: Bad Company 2
Battlefield 3
Age of Empires 4 (someday)
Shogun 2: Total War

 

[sticks435]

Originally posted by: sactoking

Originally posted by: mwmorph
lol I was thinking, sequesl are getting out of hand, but that resolution would limit you to about 2% of the AAA game market.

I am perfectly fine with that. I played Diablo. I doubt Diablo II or III bring that much more to the table. I played StarCraft. I doubt II will be much different. Sequels give developers a chance to charge you for a slightly better version of what you've already done. If I only pay for 2 or 3 games in 2010 b/c of this, that's fine; at least I know I'll be supporting developers with quasi-original ideas.

Actullay, D2 is better than D1 in just about every way. Check out the thread about the guy asking if anyone still plays D1. D3 I could see skipping until it comes down in price, but skipping D2 is doing a disservice to Blizzard in their heyday.

 

[ChaosDivine]

Guild Wars 2! Trailer looks gorgeous.

 

[GullyFoyle]

BF1943 (PC)
MW2
Rage (maybe)
BFBC2
BF3 !!!

 

[Dorkenstein]

Not a whole lot, that's fo sho.

 

[Cogman]

Starcraft 2 is the biggest one I'm waiting for. Other then that, not many games interest me now-a-days. Most of the titles I grew up loving went down the EA crap hole. (C&C, B&W, ect)