I was the one to mention how I could see a judge leaning towards the mother in your case
I'm also the one you tried to insult by calling my children's mothers "baby mamas"
You knocked up a bunch of women and aren't married to them. The kids lived with her, not you. The
very common term for that is what was used and isn't, by itself, an insult. If it is, it's an extremely minor one - vastly lower in scale than what you've been throwing at me an others for the "crime" of not subscribing to your thought patterns.
You also said not one of them
ever denied you time with the kids, meaning you either didn't want nearly enough time in the first place, or you came straight off a hippie commune. That happens very,
very rarely in the real world - especially with the drama of
several exes.
While people often behave differently on the internet than in real life, this guy seems to be genuinely nuts. He has repeatedly talked about how women conspire against him in seemingly every area of his life, he's filled with sputtering rage at even the thought of them, and he has the communication style of a teenager.
If he acts anywhere near like he acts here in real life, that judge was a smart person indeed. This is not a healthy example for children.
Let's analyze this one!

"Genuinely nuts" - vague insult to turn the heat on.
"talked about how women conspire against him in every area of life" - a complete fabrication designed to get every liberal-thinker on board the hate train together.
"sputtering rage at even the thought of them" - a mental picture designed to both insult and mock, mostly mock, and get everyone on the hate train happy and laughing together... bond together and fight the common foe!
"communication style of a teenager" - an amusing role-reversal and complete fabrication again. Facts aren't needed, only the accusation that will get the comrades you've bonded with to accept it anyway and all cackle with glee.
"the judge was a smart person indeed!" - the climax of this little escapade as you all have your mini-orgasm. It doesn't matter that this was not a judge problem, but a vindictive ex-wife not following judge's orders or a system that doesn't care about it -- we're painting a picture here and no one wants to consider a judge wrong, so let's continue the charade and pretend
a judge is ALSO on your side to stop an eeeevil man guilty of ThoughtCrime.
"This is not a healthy example for children." - the final conclusion to this little episode where everyone on board nods to themselves in unison having convinced themselves they allllll did the right thing... the man they just beat the hell out of deserved it - they were protecting the children, after all!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvYSPxvrq5s <- how SJW's work
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6iqKjPDGWE <- great comedy on how SJW's think - predicted +20 years ago.