Gallup: Bush Sets New Record

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
The alternative to the war candidate is to vote in the socialism candidate. Where is the ?no war? PLUS ?no socialism? candidate? Le sigh?

Color me unhappy this November.
McCain has a universal health care plan, too. For Iraqis and Afghanis. On our dime.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
Even if McCain is somehow elected in November, he will find himself in the GHB dilemma. As much as he may want to continue four more years of spend and borrow, he will find GWB done spent it all. And like GHB, McCain will have to say, read my lips, gotta raise taxes.

Except this time, McCain will have a far deeper hole than GHB had. And given his pro war policies, will find a international community willing to let US economic woes rein in a my way or the highway foreign policy.

As it is, the international community is just waiting for GWB to go the way of the dodo, they will not passively sit by watching another four years of the same. And the quickest way to force it to a head is to simply quit loaning money to us. And when we belly up to the oil buying bar, we are soon likely to get, In Allah we trust, all others pay cash.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,964
55,355
136
Just so you guys all know, they are saying Bush has the lowest ratings of any president since FDR NOT because FDR had low approval ratings. He didn't. For most of his presidency he enjoyed pretty widespread popularity. They mention since FDR because that is the era in which scientific polling has been conducted on Presidential approval.

So, trying to compare good 'ol George to FDR is probably not a particularly good idea.
 

cirrrocco

Golden Member
Sep 7, 2004
1,952
78
91
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Brigandier
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: Brigandier
FDR was the best president ever
Why?

so it's a good thing to have high disapproval.
Good for your ego, or your party?


FDR single-handedly defeated tyrany, I would say he kicked its ass, but that's just being insensitive.

:confused:

You haven't studied much WWII history, have you? Let's just say that 20 million dead Russian soldiers would disagree with you that there was anything "single-handed" about it.

Excellent point. A lot of people tend to forget what the russians did in the great war.More people died in the eastern front than in all other fronts during ww2.

The germans lost abt 5 million of their elite soldiers just on that front..which would have faced the allied assault in normandy if it wasnt for ussr.

 

Fayd

Diamond Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,970
2
76
www.manwhoring.com
Originally posted by: Brigandier
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: Brigandier
FDR was the best president ever
Why?

so it's a good thing to have high disapproval.
Good for your ego, or your party?


FDR single-handedly defeated tyrany, I would say he kicked its ass, but that's just being insensitive.

you dont know much about FDR's policies...or FDR in general, do you?
 

Fayd

Diamond Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,970
2
76
www.manwhoring.com
Originally posted by: Marlin1975
Originally posted by: Farang
Who are these 28%?

Hard core Fox "news" viewers, oreally, rush, etc...

not exactly.

i cant stand fox news, or bill orielly, or rush limbaugh, or mike savage, or anybody else you want to name off.

both sides have their talking heads, and people that pander to masses of idiots. i hate them all. and all regions of the political spectrum are infested with idiots.

i do have a newsfeed from foxnews in my bookmarks...but then again, i also have one from aljazeera...
 

superstition

Platinum Member
Feb 2, 2008
2,219
221
101
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Now lets not put all the blame on most of America's problems on poor Dub, some it is falls squarely on the fools that voted him in.
He lost the popular vote and lost Florida (only "winning" due to fraud and political machinations). If not for "felon" lists, butterfly ballots, Kathryn Harris, Jeb Bush, 5 members of SCOTUS, FOX, fake riots, Carlisle, and the like, we wouldn't have had eight years of his crap.
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: Brigandier
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: Brigandier
FDR was the best president ever
Why?

so it's a good thing to have high disapproval.
Good for your ego, or your party?


FDR single-handedly defeated tyrany, I would say he kicked its ass, but that's just being insensitive.

:confused:

FDR cockpunched Hitler and singlehandedly won WWII, jeez, don't you know history?
 

fallout man

Golden Member
Nov 20, 2007
1,787
1
0
"This presidency is not sinking--it's SOARING! If anything, they are not re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, they are re-arranging the deck chairs on the Hindenburg!"
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,871
10,662
147
Originally posted by: Farang
Who are these 28%?

ProfJohn, CadSortaGuy, and Pabster are the only three I can name personally, thank god.

To them add every brain dead, bible thumping, gay hating, inbred, slack-jawed mouth breather you can find, I guess. Oh, yes, and the noted blowhard welfare cheat and hard drug abuser Rush Limbaugh.

Mega dittoes to you, too!

 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: Brigandier
FDR was the best president ever, so it's a good thing to have high disapproval.

Um, FDR didn't have higher disapproval than Bush. When they say 'since FDR', that's poorly phrased, it means 'in the history of the poll since it began under FDR', it seems.

When Truman got rid of the revered Gen. MacArthur in the Korean war, the public turned on him big time. I think the next lowest rating was Nixon with Watergate.
 

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
22,066
883
126
Originally posted by: cirrrocco
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Brigandier
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: Brigandier
FDR was the best president ever
Why?

so it's a good thing to have high disapproval.
Good for your ego, or your party?


FDR single-handedly defeated tyrany, I would say he kicked its ass, but that's just being insensitive.

:confused:

You haven't studied much WWII history, have you? Let's just say that 20 million dead Russian soldiers would disagree with you that there was anything "single-handed" about it.

Excellent point. A lot of people tend to forget what the russians did in the great war.More people died in the eastern front than in all other fronts during ww2.

The germans lost abt 5 million of their elite soldiers just on that front..which would have faced the allied assault in normandy if it wasnt for ussr.


True. The war was already being won before the US entered. And we entered as cowboys, yeehaw! Rape, pillage, destroy! We knew for years about what was going on and did nothing until we were caught with our pants down in Pearl Harbor which had nothing to do with WWII but with trade embargos against Japan. Then we entered. Then when the war was basically over we nuke two cities which really had nothing to do with pearl harbor nor the war. In fact most who died and sufffered the nuke attack were against the Japanese govt. We did not enter WWII for the right reasons. And we have not entered or started a war for the right reasons ever since.
 

Tab

Lifer
Sep 15, 2002
12,145
0
76
Originally posted by: Oyeve
True. The war was already being won before the US entered. And we entered as cowboys, yeehaw! Rape, pillage, destroy! We knew for years about what was going on and did nothing until we were caught with our pants down in Pearl Harbor which had nothing to do with WWII but with trade embargos against Japan. Then we entered. Then when the war was basically over we nuke two cities which really had nothing to do with pearl harbor nor the war. In fact most who died and sufffered the nuke attack were against the Japanese govt. We did not enter WWII for the right reasons. And we have not entered or started a war for the right reasons ever since.

We didn't enter World War II for the right reasons? How so?
 

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
22,066
883
126
Originally posted by: Tab
Originally posted by: Oyeve
True. The war was already being won before the US entered. And we entered as cowboys, yeehaw! Rape, pillage, destroy! We knew for years about what was going on and did nothing until we were caught with our pants down in Pearl Harbor which had nothing to do with WWII but with trade embargos against Japan. Then we entered. Then when the war was basically over we nuke two cities which really had nothing to do with pearl harbor nor the war. In fact most who died and sufffered the nuke attack were against the Japanese govt. We did not enter WWII for the right reasons. And we have not entered or started a war for the right reasons ever since.

We didn't enter World War II for the right reasons? How so?

We should have entered for the atrocities that we knew were happening years before pearl harbor. The genocide that was happening among dozens of other reasons.
 

Fayd

Diamond Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,970
2
76
www.manwhoring.com
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Fayd
Originally posted by: Farang
Who are these 28%?

i'll go ahead and say i'm one of them.

Any particular reason, or do you just really like having a President who goes by "Dubya"?

A lot of his policies i agree with. the one that most readily springs to mind would be gun control. also, keeping health care privatized is important to me as well.

some domestic issues are more important to me than whatever happens internationally. and those domestic issues are more in line with his policies than many others i can think of at the moment.

also, i dont want a president who bows to the "almighty" gallup poll. public opinion, while it might be observed, should not be taken into account when a decision is made. i would rather have a president disregard it completely than make his every decision based on it.

the average american is too stupid to let have a say in politics. they are pawns of the media, who tells them how to think, when to sleep, what to eat, and where to shit. they are highly impressionable, and have attention spans on the order of seconds, and memories on the order of minutes.

i get off my soapbox now.
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
Originally posted by: Fayd
Originally posted by: Rainsford
Originally posted by: Fayd
Originally posted by: Farang
Who are these 28%?

i'll go ahead and say i'm one of them.

Any particular reason, or do you just really like having a President who goes by "Dubya"?

A lot of his policies i agree with. the one that most readily springs to mind would be gun control. also, keeping health care privatized is important to me as well.

some domestic issues are more important to me than whatever happens internationally. and those domestic issues are more in line with his policies than many others i can think of at the moment.

also, i dont want a president who bows to the "almighty" gallup poll. public opinion, while it might be observed, should not be taken into account when a decision is made. i would rather have a president disregard it completely than make his every decision based on it.

the average american is too stupid to let have a say in politics. they are pawns of the media, who tells them how to think, when to sleep, what to eat, and where to shit. they are highly impressionable, and have attention spans on the order of seconds, and memories on the order of minutes.

i get off my soapbox now.

You're right, the average american IS too stupid to have a say in politics, that is why shit for brains Americans voted Bush into office twice.

Also, you're confusing making unpopular decisions for the good of America but unpopular with the people vs. making decisions that make absolutely no sense and end up hurting everyone and everyone gets pissed because of it.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: Phokus
You're right, the average american IS too stupid to have a say in politics, that is what shit for brains Americans voted Bush into office twice.
Agreed. I like how Fayd played-off Bush's entire history of bad foreign policy decisions, military decisions, diplomatic blunders, etc., by simply saying:

Originally posted by: Fayd
some domestic issues are more important to me than whatever happens internationally.
What happens when international issues affect domestics issues? Does it matter then?
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
Originally posted by: Phokus

FDR cockpunched Hitler and singlehandedly won WWII, jeez, don't you know history?

i'm always amazed that people don't know b.j. blazkowicz from rtcw is based on fdr
 

Fayd

Diamond Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,970
2
76
www.manwhoring.com
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: Phokus
You're right, the average american IS too stupid to have a say in politics, that is what shit for brains Americans voted Bush into office twice.
Agreed. I like how Fayd played-off Bush's entire history of bad foreign policy decisions, military decisions, diplomatic blunders, etc., by simply saying:

Originally posted by: Fayd
some domestic issues are more important to me than whatever happens internationally.
What happens when international issues affect domestics issues? Does it matter then?

played off?

those issues are more important to you, so you can vote for whoever you want for whose ideology matches in line with yours.

for me, the issues i mentioned are more important to me than whatever our commander in chief decides to do in iraq. (i do mean to de-personalize that, cause i dont care *who* our commander in chief is)