- Jun 23, 2001
- 27,730
- 8
- 0
http://www.androidpolice.com/2012/0...iew-an-embarrassing-lazy-arrogant-money-grab/
Another highly detailed review from Android Police. Clearly, he loathed the Note 10.1. I haven't gone hands on with one yet myself, but I've handled the Asus TF201 and TF700, and those feel great in the hands. Crappy plastic, squishy plastic, is simply not acceptable in a 500 dollar flagship device.
Samsung, if you keep letting your legal department design your devices and cutting corners, you will wind up in HTC's current position in a year.
Locked by moderator PM for going way off-topic
Ok, this thread has run it's course. We've gone way off-topic - the thread was about reviews of the Galaxy Note 10.1, not what kind of boxes Samsung and Apple use. Plus, three warnings, and I could have added another.
I will say that I am personally getting a little frustrated with the fact that we have threads about reviews of devices and they devolve into the same sort of lawsuit thread that we've been having more or less non-stop for over a year now. It's in the news (it's in jury deliberations) and so the discussion makes sense, but not in every thread. In this case, it could be argued that the Note is what it is due to the lawsuit and so I'm not going to do anything here... except lock the thread. But I would request that we keep the review threads as threads about the review and the device and leave the debating about who copied whose boxes to the legal threads.
Moderator PM
More design from Samsung's Legal Department, just like the GSIII. Everything about this is made to scream "I am not an iPad." Apple claims "substantial black borders on all sides being roughly equal in width," so this thing has uneven, "Pearl Grey" borders. Apple suggested Samsung could make a non-infringing device with a "front surface that isn't entirely flat" and "thick frames rather than a thin rim around the front surface," so Samsung fitted the Note 10.1 with hideous, thick, plastic framing.
Samsung didn't design this to look good, they designed it only to not look like something else, and it shows.
The Note 10.1 is wrapped in the trashiest, most awful, cheapest-feeling plastic I've ever experienced. Sure, the finish is Samsung's usual glossy-plastic junk, but this plastic isn't even rigid. It's squishy.
Yeah, you heard me, squishy plastic. You can easily flex it with a light touch, and you can feel the whole back deform in your hands when using it. It's sort of like holding a marshmallow.
On the software side: Samsung desperately wants to develop the next version of Android themselves, but they lack the technical ability, vision, ecosystem support, and design chops to make it happen. They want to add features, and maybe even have a good idea or two, but they just can't execute those ideas in a way that makes them good.
Samsung is the world's largest Android OEM, by a huge margin. They need to get the message that this kind of half-assed, lazy, profit-margin-first style of device building is unacceptable.
The hardware is pure, unadulterated garbage. The build quality is so bad, I think it gave me cancer. Samsung gave us last year's display tech and saved their best tablet screen for Apple.
Another highly detailed review from Android Police. Clearly, he loathed the Note 10.1. I haven't gone hands on with one yet myself, but I've handled the Asus TF201 and TF700, and those feel great in the hands. Crappy plastic, squishy plastic, is simply not acceptable in a 500 dollar flagship device.
Samsung, if you keep letting your legal department design your devices and cutting corners, you will wind up in HTC's current position in a year.
Locked by moderator PM for going way off-topic
Ok, this thread has run it's course. We've gone way off-topic - the thread was about reviews of the Galaxy Note 10.1, not what kind of boxes Samsung and Apple use. Plus, three warnings, and I could have added another.
I will say that I am personally getting a little frustrated with the fact that we have threads about reviews of devices and they devolve into the same sort of lawsuit thread that we've been having more or less non-stop for over a year now. It's in the news (it's in jury deliberations) and so the discussion makes sense, but not in every thread. In this case, it could be argued that the Note is what it is due to the lawsuit and so I'm not going to do anything here... except lock the thread. But I would request that we keep the review threads as threads about the review and the device and leave the debating about who copied whose boxes to the legal threads.
Moderator PM
Last edited by a moderator: