• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

FX-8320 vs. FX-8350 vs. FX-8320e Real-World Power Consumption

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Under Prime 95 the FXs consume 23% more than with heavy regular MT loading.

With a FX8370E at 4.5GHz and Prime 95 Hardware.fr got 195W delta at the wall.

Under regular MT loading the delta would be 158W and 128W respectively at the wall and at the CPU level.

The FX8320E tested by AT has 3-4% higher comsumption numbers than this 8370E, wich point to a negligible difference between these two SKUs, at least up to this frequency, at 4.8 the 8370E is clearly better.
 
Back
Top