• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

FX-53

T

Tango57

Senior member
here's another review on the new FX-53. all i can say is WOW! the chip's is just awesome but what struck me even more is the performance of it's little brother, the mobile 2500+ overclocked. makes me wish i bought a mobile instead. you'll see why. 🙁

check it out here: FX-53 review

note:
currently @ Newegg

AMD Mobile Athlon XP 2500+ =$93
AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 =$850
 
LOL thats very nice yo see an overclocked 90$ CPU getting benchmark results close to a 850$ one... 😉
anyway, I don't think anyone would buy the FX53 right now, unless he's either very stupid, or he just has a few millions of bucks running around in his bank account...
btw, can someone please explain me how come that even with their newest and most expensive CPU, AMD still can't reach Intel's performance in video or image editing?
 
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: stardust
Originally posted by: shady06
for the price of the FX53, i would buy a mobile barton and a Mach II and OC the $hit out of it
Click to expand...

Or a Mach..L
Click to expand...

Well thats a bit odd... they claim to have an OCd Pentium 4 EE Prescott... There is no such chip. The 3.4EE is a Northie.
Click to expand...

that website has been confirmed to be fake numerous times...

btw, i wasnt referring to their system, i was referring to a prommy 😉
 
Hmm, if I were upgrading today, and had money to set fire to (which is rarely the case) I would go with an FX-53, otherwise that $90 Mobile Barton 2500+ is looking like a remarkably attractive upgrade from my AXP2000+.
 
Originally posted by: joe2004
As said, mobile Barton + Prometeia, and you have faster processor for less money.
Click to expand...
Joe, a decent hsf is enough to get 2.5ghz out of the mobile Bartons.
 
Originally posted by: myocardia
Originally posted by: joe2004
As said, mobile Barton + Prometeia, and you have faster processor for less money.
Click to expand...
Joe, a decent hsf is enough to get 2.5ghz out of the mobile Bartons.
Click to expand...


yeah, but since we are allowing ourselfs to spend $800+ on a cpu, why not? 😉
 
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: stardust
Originally posted by: shady06
for the price of the FX53, i would buy a mobile barton and a Mach II and OC the $hit out of it
Click to expand...

Or a Mach..L
Click to expand...

Well thats a bit odd... they claim to have an OCd Pentium 4 EE Prescott... There is no such chip. The 3.4EE is a Northie.
Click to expand...

that website has been confirmed to be fake numerous times...

btw, i wasnt referring to their system, i was referring to a prommy 😉
Click to expand...

Just confirming the outrageous pricing... yeah, I have doubts about the go-l website, but it LOOKS more legit than MICHAEL's fastest computers 😉
 
i think its worth buying, just to overclock the crap out of it. Id love to see what scores id be able to bench.
 
With Prometeia you'll get mobile barton up to 3 GHz and that will beat the crap out of FX-53. Plus you'll save about $150.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top