omg. Finally a vacation camera I can afford. I couldn't justify the micro 4/3rds at all.
I was thinking about a used *ist Pentax with a pancake.
I guess I was looking at the prices for the "PEN2". Thanks for pointing that out.? the E-PL1 is $600. granted, ugly as sin, heh. and lacking a dial control. But it's pretty good. And the 14-42 is a lot smaller than sony's 18-55.. heh
but still, the sony looks to be pretty good. priced very nicely.
? the E-PL1 is $600. granted, ugly as sin, heh. and lacking a dial control. But it's pretty good. And the 14-42 is a lot smaller than sony's 18-55.. heh
but still, the sony looks to be pretty good. priced very nicely.
I think the Sony's 18-55 is about as small as can be. Don't forget that the Sony's sensor has nearly twice the area of the E-PL1's sensor. The resulting lens needs to be larger as well.
you mean enables AF in the adapter for the A-Mount lenses?Latest firmware enables AF apparently. FM forums, shrug, nikon/canon centric, so of course they'll find any flaw they can. The 16mm is very sharp center wise at least... it's a new lens format so there will be flaws until they sort it out.
