FULL REVIEW of the Sony NEX3 and NEX5 micro APS-C compacts

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

randomlinh

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,846
2
0
linh.wordpress.com
omg. Finally a vacation camera I can afford. I couldn't justify the micro 4/3rds at all.
I was thinking about a used *ist Pentax with a pancake.

? the E-PL1 is $600. granted, ugly as sin, heh. and lacking a dial control. But it's pretty good. And the 14-42 is a lot smaller than sony's 18-55.. heh

but still, the sony looks to be pretty good. priced very nicely.
 
Last edited:

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,883
63
91
? the E-PL1 is $600. granted, ugly as sin, heh. and lacking a dial control. But it's pretty good. And the 14-42 is a lot smaller than sony's 18-55.. heh

but still, the sony looks to be pretty good. priced very nicely.
I guess I was looking at the prices for the "PEN2". Thanks for pointing that out.
 

996GT2

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2005
5,212
0
76
? the E-PL1 is $600. granted, ugly as sin, heh. and lacking a dial control. But it's pretty good. And the 14-42 is a lot smaller than sony's 18-55.. heh

but still, the sony looks to be pretty good. priced very nicely.

I think the Sony's 18-55 is about as small as can be. Don't forget that the Sony's sensor has nearly twice the area of the E-PL1's sensor. The resulting lens needs to be larger as well.
 

randomlinh

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,846
2
0
linh.wordpress.com
I think the Sony's 18-55 is about as small as can be. Don't forget that the Sony's sensor has nearly twice the area of the E-PL1's sensor. The resulting lens needs to be larger as well.

that's what I was mainly pointing out, there's no where for the sony to go sizewise because the sensor is large. but the sensor is larger, and seems to be pretty good (altho, I will agree their lens samples seem a bit soft). all about tradeoffs and which ones are for you.
 

Myrdhinn

Member
Apr 13, 2001
57
0
0
Latest firmware enables AF apparently. FM forums, shrug, nikon/canon centric, so of course they'll find any flaw they can. The 16mm is very sharp center wise at least... it's a new lens format so there will be flaws until they sort it out.
 

randomlinh

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,846
2
0
linh.wordpress.com
Latest firmware enables AF apparently. FM forums, shrug, nikon/canon centric, so of course they'll find any flaw they can. The 16mm is very sharp center wise at least... it's a new lens format so there will be flaws until they sort it out.
you mean enables AF in the adapter for the A-Mount lenses?
 

Myrdhinn

Member
Apr 13, 2001
57
0
0
Ooops, yes, enabled in the adapter. Though I can only imagine how awkward it would be with a 70-400 G lens or a Bigma.
 

Cattykit

Senior member
Nov 3, 2009
521
0
0
Great camera....but, now Sony is playing old Canon.
No manual control in video mode sucks big time. This camera can generate great HQ videos yet it's terribly limited by lack of shutter speed control. At least, I hope Sony unlimit shutter speed control.

Or, they could follow Canon's case and release firmwares that will enable manual control.