frostedflakes
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2005
- 7,925
- 1
- 81
AMD Considers Equipping FX Chips with Liquid-Cooling Solution.
If they are putting out feelers with this idea. I think its great.
It would give it a nice advantage over most usual smaller high rpm stock hsf.
AMD Considers Equipping FX Chips with Liquid-Cooling Solution.
If they are putting out feelers with this idea. I think its great.
It would give it a nice advantage over most usual smaller high rpm stock hsf.
I just hope they'll sell the chips all alone with a price cut like they used to do.
AMD Considers Equipping FX Chips with Liquid-Cooling Solution.
If they are putting out feelers with this idea. I think its great.
It would give it a nice advantage over most usual smaller high rpm stock hsf.
Xbit claims Intel is considering the same thing, so this is hardly a case of AMD needing H2O to compete with 1155.According to Xbit Labs, which I increasingly read after having a whiff of shit, AMD may be offering liquid-cooling to the top of the FX line. There's a lot of AMD guys there who are hollering about the performance of the high-end FX... if AMD needs H2O to compete with 1155, they're STRAIGHT fucked.
I am interested in a 3.0GHz 8-core (with turbo) which performs like my 2.4GHz 6-core (with turbo)... until January.
Edit: Didn't see Notty's post.
Daimon
Where did Xbit say Intel was considering water cooling? I missed it. Is there possibly a link? Thanks.Both AMD and Intel are now considering to bundle self-contained coolers with their enthusiast-class FX and Core i7 3000-series "Sandy Bridge E" (SNB-E) microprocessors in a bid to offer better user experience and allow to overclock their chips better right out of the box.
3rd paragraph
In INTEGER single threaded applications , normalized at equal frequency ,
a BD core is 15% faster than a K10.5 core , while in single threaded
FP it show a dramatic 144% better performance, according to this bench,
wich is yet to be proved legit , but the numbers are relatively good if true..
Are you referring to OEM chips? They typically come without a HSF but they also typically come with a scant 30day warranty (versus the 3yr warranty for retail units).
It was in the link posted above: http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cooler...ng_FX_Chips_with_Liquid_Cooling_Solution.htmlAnything out of the ordinary, water cooling, or the need for a gimmick, does not bode well for bulldozer IMHO. Why need anything at all? I'll have a CPU and a HSF please.
If they need to entice with water cooling (does this mean vapor chamber?) what performance do you think we can expect? Or is it a problem with tremendous leakage in the new man. process causing major heat? It is indeed a mystery.
@Arg Clin: Where did Xbit say Intel was considering water cooling? I missed it. Is there possibly a link? Thanks.
Both AMD and Intel are now considering to bundle self-contained coolers with their enthusiast-class FX and Core i7 3000-series "Sandy Bridge E" (SNB-E) microprocessors in a bid to offer better user experience and allow to overclock their chips better right out of the box.
If they are in the pricerange that a boxed H2O system would cost, they might as well just include a highend aircooler. Seems like a marketing gimmick more than anything.
Anyone else concerned that packaging liquid cooling would mean it can't manage temps at the clocks they want to market at on air?
Anything out of the ordinary, water cooling, or the need for a gimmick, does not bode well for bulldozer IMHO. Why need anything at all? I'll have a CPU and a HSF please.
If they need to entice with water cooling (does this mean vapor chamber?) what performance do you think we can expect? Or is it a problem with tremendous leakage in the new man. process causing major heat? It is indeed a mystery.
@Arg Clin: Where did Xbit say Intel was considering water cooling? I missed it. Is there possibly a link? Thanks.
Anyone else concerned that packaging liquid cooling would mean it can't manage temps at the clocks they want to market at on air?
they never said WATER cooling just LIQUID
For example, many solutions with heat pipes count as "liquid" because the liquid evaporates on top of the CPU, then condenses at the fins, and is absorbed by the wick and brought back to right above the CPU where the cycle repeats itself.
I'm not saying that liquid cooling can't make sense in some cases. I suppose my beef with the whole thing is that lately I've been forced to buy boxed processors (or tray processors at a higher price than the boxed version - go figure). How about AMD and Intel just let it up to us to decide what kind of cooling solution we want, and not force us to pay for a boxed hairdryer style cooler, which is only good as paperweight. /rantOne man's marketing gimmick is another man's good idea. High end air coolers are huge, I got 140mm or so left in my case, I can't use most high end tower coolers since they are over 150mm. Self contained liquid coolers fit perfectly (Antect H620). High end horizontal coolers like the Noctua NH-C12P might block memory slots and probably won't fit on quite a few Micro ATX boards where a self contained liquid cooler will. Let's not dismiss a good idea as marketing gimmick.