- Mar 20, 2017
- 4,773
- 7,157
- 136
Last edited:
There are a lot of places that don't operate that way.You don't have kids when you cannot afford to feed yourself.
Still hidden behind a paywall.
Still hidden behind a paywall.
Yep…that worked.I updated the link. If it still doesn’t work I’m not sure why.
China's been around awhile, it's not going anywhere soon!Yep…that worked.
I’m all in favor of China collapsing back into the shithole it was pre-Nixon.
Heck it’s hard to call China “communist” anymore. The reality is it’s an authoritarian capitalist state run by a party that used to hold communist beliefs.We can crap on China all we want, at the end of the day I am not sure end stage capitalism is looking a whole lot better.
Defeat communism... ok. Well it was better for a while but lets just agree it's taking a turn as of late.
I mean is "keep having more kids so you can look after the old people and consume more crap" really long term planning? Because that seems to be what everyone is arguing for!Seems like China is having a problem with their historically revered long term planning and their present day addiction with making a fast buck dirt cheap. I recall the days when China had a One Child policy that is now possibly showing its aftereffects whereby since male babies were/are the traditionally preferred choice, many female births were....terminated by unofficial means. If my quick search is correct, China had instituted a Two Child Policy about 10 years ago. Gon'na take a generation or two to get the 'ol birth rate back up again.
Sounds overly pointless and simplistic when you frame it like that. What is your suggested alternative?I mean is "keep having more kids so you can look after the old people and consume more crap" really long term planning? Because that seems to be what everyone is arguing for!
Well as a global leader and economic powerhouse my idea would be....Sounds overly pointless and simplistic when you frame it like that. What is your suggested alternative?.
Somehow the idea of bearing children strictly to feed the war machine isn't super appealing.Sounds overly pointless and simplistic when you frame it like that. What is your suggested alternative?.
Edit: Personally I could see fewer people on the globe, taking less shits on the founding eco system we grew up in, sure.
But you'd need a level of relative peace round the globe, not this meta-ww-three we have going on right now. Right now we need bodies for the fights to come. Right? And tech that kills those bodies?
Our world is not build for peace, so we need bodies.
But it'd be cool with less. And free education, UBI, healthcare for all etc... I'd be real cool.
Yea but you are thinking... There is an easy remedy to that.Somehow the idea of bearing children strictly to feed the war machine isn't super appealing.
Not sure I get your meaning?Yea but you are thinking... There is an easy remedy to that.
Pull education from people. Then they wont be thinking.Not sure I get your meaning?
Pull education from people. Then they wont be thinking.
Plus if you dont .. the other side wins.Somehow the idea of bearing children strictly to feed the war machine isn't super appealing.