the difference is Cruise ships arnt really designed to do what a Warship is.. we dont dodge storms.. we go right through them..
Originally posted by: ScrewFace
I'm watching it on CNN right now. Apparently one of the waves was 73 feet high and took out hundreds of rooms and the restaurant. The company (what else is new) only offered a 25% reduction for their next cruise. The passengers on CNN will never take another cruise ship again. They are seeking legal advice as they want a full refund...and they should get it!:|
While certainly a traumatic experience for the 2,000 passengers on board, post-cruise remarks by passengers to reporters that they were glad to get off the "Titanic" is an absurd comparison.
According to NCL, at no time was the ship in distress no distress calls were made and the safety and integrity of the ship was not compromised by the rogue wave.
It's a testament to modern ship-building techniques, coupled with rigid maritime safety protocols, that result in ships like Norwegian Dawn being able to withstand such a horrible natural impact with virtually no structural damage and no serious injuries to passengers or crew.
In fact, after repairs in Charleston and a U.S. Coast Guard inspection, Norwegian Dawn was fit to sail and continued its voyage to New York, arriving a day late on April 18. The ship has resumed its schedule, although no word yet from NCL as to how long additional repairs may take to some of the flooded cabins and public areas.
For passengers to remotely compare their experience as terrifying as it was to that of passengers on the ill-fated Titanic, and for media outlets including The Associated Press to print/broadcast such remarks verbatim, without adding factual content, is wrong.
It's not fair to NCL, the industry, or the millions of cruise travelers who embark on voyages daily, secure in the knowledge that today's major cruise lines operate at the highest levels of safety standards and protocols.
True, there are risks in all forms of travel and on rare occasions accidents or in this case a freak wave happen. But, please, stop the unchecked comparisons.
For the record, 93 years ago this month the R.M.S. Titanic, a White Star Line steamship struck an iceberg in the North Atlantic and sank on her maiden voyage.
Over 1,500 lives were lost.
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: ScrewFace
I'm watching it on CNN right now. Apparently one of the waves was 73 feet high and took out hundreds of rooms and the restaurant. The company (what else is new) only offered a 25% reduction for their next cruise. The passengers on CNN will never take another cruise ship again. They are seeking legal advice as they want a full refund...and they should get it!:|
The company didn't make the wave.
They should haul that bitch known as "mother nature" into court and take her for every dime she has!
This could be like suing a train company if a monster truck ran over your train.
Originally posted by: cavemanmoron
LOL.
Can't happen to me.
I am a certified landlubber.
I won't go if I can't stop the vehicle on the side of the road.
{No planes,no trains,no boats}
hahah first they say that and then they end it with the titanicOriginally posted by: sharkeeper
While certainly a traumatic experience for the 2,000 passengers on board, post-cruise remarks by passengers to reporters that they were glad to get off the "Titanic" is an absurd comparison.
According to NCL, at no time was the ship in distress no distress calls were made and the safety and integrity of the ship was not compromised by the rogue wave.
It's a testament to modern ship-building techniques, coupled with rigid maritime safety protocols, that result in ships like Norwegian Dawn being able to withstand such a horrible natural impact with virtually no structural damage and no serious injuries to passengers or crew.
In fact, after repairs in Charleston and a U.S. Coast Guard inspection, Norwegian Dawn was fit to sail and continued its voyage to New York, arriving a day late on April 18. The ship has resumed its schedule, although no word yet from NCL as to how long additional repairs may take to some of the flooded cabins and public areas.
For passengers to remotely compare their experience as terrifying as it was to that of passengers on the ill-fated Titanic, and for media outlets including The Associated Press to print/broadcast such remarks verbatim, without adding factual content, is wrong.
It's not fair to NCL, the industry, or the millions of cruise travelers who embark on voyages daily, secure in the knowledge that today's major cruise lines operate at the highest levels of safety standards and protocols.
True, there are risks in all forms of travel and on rare occasions accidents or in this case a freak wave happen. But, please, stop the unchecked comparisons.
For the record, 93 years ago this month the R.M.S. Titanic, a White Star Line steamship struck an iceberg in the North Atlantic and sank on her maiden voyage.
Over 1,500 lives were lost.
Originally posted by: CVSiN
they arnt that big...
put a cruise ship next to USS Ronald Reagan or any other Nimitz Class carrier and you will see cruise ship looks like a tug boat =P
Originally posted by: labgeek
Originally posted by: CVSiN
they arnt that big...
put a cruise ship next to USS Ronald Reagan or any other Nimitz Class carrier and you will see cruise ship looks like a tug boat =P
I wouldn't exactly describe them as a tug boat when comparing today's megaships...
CVN-76 USS R Reagan - 1092 ft 98K tons
Carnival Conquest - 952ft 110K tons
Cunards Queen Mary II - 1132 ft 150K tons
Originally posted by: ScrewFace
I'm watching it on CNN right now. Apparently one of the waves was 73 feet high and took out hundreds of rooms and the restaurant. The company (what else is new) only offered a 25% reduction for their next cruise. The passengers on CNN will never take another cruise ship again. They are seeking legal advice as they want a full refund...and they should get it!:|
Originally posted by: lotust
im glad this was not my ship. we just got back from the south carribean islands. I took a picture of one of there ships. hehe
http://www.uploadpixels.com/upload/1114...om_4-24-05_7_day_cruse_DEFAULT_314.jpg
http://www.uploadpixels.com/upload/1114...om_4-24-05_7_day_cruse_DEFAULT_055.jpg
thats me on the right
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: ScrewFace
I'm watching it on CNN right now. Apparently one of the waves was 73 feet high and took out hundreds of rooms and the restaurant. The company (what else is new) only offered a 25% reduction for their next cruise. The passengers on CNN will never take another cruise ship again. They are seeking legal advice as they want a full refund...and they should get it!:|
they dont deserve anything more than what they are getting. the cruiseline didnt create the wave...why should they be held responsible for mother nature?
