France may ban religious symbols in public institutions

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: ELP
Originally posted by: DragonMasterAlex
I'm an Atheist and even *I* think this is ridiculous. Does it ever occur to anyone that even a state enforced *atheism* constitutes an establishment of religion?

Bedtime.

Jason

Agreed. The same thing is happening in the US. Luckily, the courts have ruled the opposite in our (the people's) case so far.

Where have you guy's been? Athiests have been filing lawsuits like mad in the U.S. and winning. Look in the God thread.

The Judge that fired Judge Moore admitted he is an Athiest.

Athiests filed a lawsuit last week to have all roadside cross memorials removed as they are "offended" by seeing the religious icons as they drive.

It's an onslaught.


I thought it was a panel that removed Moore?

And where if it was just one man, could you supply a link confirming your claim? Honestly Dave, you post so much BULLSH!T that I don't know what to believe.

It was a panel of the other Judges and the lead Judge said straight out he was an Athiest. This is what was reported back when those articles and posts. Can't help the extreme and convenient memory losses of the AT experts in here.



Maybe you could stop with the BULLSH!T and simply say the the lead judge in the panel that removed Moore said he was an athiest. Which, by the way, I can't seem to find where this was stated in the God thread. And I'm certainly not just gunna take your word for it...you post so much BULLSH!T it'd be stupid to believe anything you say without verifying it.
 

peonyu

Platinum Member
Mar 12, 2003
2,038
23
81
Originally posted by: gaga38
Originally posted by: peonyu
Originally posted by: no0b
whoa, they want to ban people from wearing jewish skull caps, muslim veils, and large Christian Crosses?

people, as in the students attending the public schools?

As it is now, a Jew cannot walk in France wearing a skull cap without getting attacked by muslims who brought thier hatred of israel/jews with them from the middle east. And christian crosses already are forbidden in schools, this new law is all about attempting to integrate muslims into french society and the part about skullcaps/crosses is just being PC about it so they dont feel singled out.

Still I dont think this will change much, there are vast areas of Paris and other cities that are self-segregated from french society where not even children can speak french, though its a start I guess.

stop telling lies
a jew can walk in france without getting attacked
this law was voted at the beginning to prevent the islamic proselytism at scholol because of the laic constitution. In order to accodomate everyone the law was extended to symbol of christians and jews.
stop centering all the pbs on jew/muslim situation, it is so easy
and for the self segregated aeras go look in the us, the phenomenom is wide spread


I guess the 10 fold increase of attacks on Jews is just a mirage then and that the recent arab migrants have nothing at all to with it, despite the number of beatings,synagogue burnings, lynchings, muders and rapes growing in paralell to thier population. Yea that makes sense.

Oh and someone earlier said Belgium is isnt as bad as France, lol at that.

Belgium
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,894
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: peonyu
Originally posted by: gaga38
Originally posted by: peonyu
Originally posted by: no0b
whoa, they want to ban people from wearing jewish skull caps, muslim veils, and large Christian Crosses?

people, as in the students attending the public schools?

As it is now, a Jew cannot walk in France wearing a skull cap without getting attacked by muslims who brought thier hatred of israel/jews with them from the middle east. And christian crosses already are forbidden in schools, this new law is all about attempting to integrate muslims into french society and the part about skullcaps/crosses is just being PC about it so they dont feel singled out.

Still I dont think this will change much, there are vast areas of Paris and other cities that are self-segregated from french society where not even children can speak french, though its a start I guess.

stop telling lies
a jew can walk in france without getting attacked
this law was voted at the beginning to prevent the islamic proselytism at scholol because of the laic constitution. In order to accodomate everyone the law was extended to symbol of christians and jews.
stop centering all the pbs on jew/muslim situation, it is so easy
and for the self segregated aeras go look in the us, the phenomenom is wide spread


I guess the 10 fold increase of attacks on Jews is just a mirage then and that the recent arab migrants have nothing at all to with it, despite the number of beatings,synagogue burnings, lynchings, muders and rapes growing in paralell to thier population. Yea that makes sense.

Oh and someone earlier said Belgium is isnt as bad as France, lol at that.

Belgium

You'll find a lot is a mirage in here, Economy is great, WMD all over the place and on and on.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: MartyTheManiak
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: peonyu
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: peonyu
Maybe if the French bothered to enforce thier secular laws when they first allowed non-french to move there they wouldnt be having this problem now, but its a little to late now, at the rate that the Muslim immigrant population is growing France will have a Muslim majority in about 50 years.

...and this is assuming that all Muslims in france are militant...

and who the hell cares what the dominant religion is in the country? You make it sound like they should try to minimize all and any influence that Muslims in the country carry.


If they become a majority then they could vote in Sharia law, and since the majority of them are not integrated into society what says that they wouldnt ?

"You make it sound like they should try to minimize all and any influence that Muslims in the country carry."

I never said that.

They could - but how do you know that most of them will vote it in.

Look at the USA- the majority religion is christianity and we COULD go to some religous code also, but that doesn't mean it'll happen.

As for integration that isn't something that happens overnight. Usually the immigrant generation never gets fully integrated anyway and it is their kids that become integrated and learn the language and culture...and by the 3rd or 4th generation you usually have complete assimilation into the respective society.

The problem is, times change and these days its really hard to integrate. Irish and Italian immigrants to america did not have access to italian and irish sattelite channels, newspapers etc.

I think immigrants in the US are well-integrated. They retain their culture just like Irish and Italian immigrants and their children do now. But they consider themselves Americans. I think the problem might be is that in the US they're more widely accepted, but in Europe they're not as accepted. An Indian man can be considered American without a doubt, but it is probably harder for an Indian to be considered French by native Frenchman.

I think that's one of the reasons why the US is leading the world technologicaly, too. Why go to Europe where you're treated like a third-rate citizen when you can come to the US and be treated like anyone else? So, many more of the brightest people choose to come to the US for their studies and help make our society better.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,894
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: MartyTheManiak
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: peonyu
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: peonyu
Maybe if the French bothered to enforce thier secular laws when they first allowed non-french to move there they wouldnt be having this problem now, but its a little to late now, at the rate that the Muslim immigrant population is growing France will have a Muslim majority in about 50 years.

...and this is assuming that all Muslims in france are militant...

and who the hell cares what the dominant religion is in the country? You make it sound like they should try to minimize all and any influence that Muslims in the country carry.


If they become a majority then they could vote in Sharia law, and since the majority of them are not integrated into society what says that they wouldnt ?

"You make it sound like they should try to minimize all and any influence that Muslims in the country carry."

I never said that.

They could - but how do you know that most of them will vote it in.

Look at the USA- the majority religion is christianity and we COULD go to some religous code also, but that doesn't mean it'll happen.

As for integration that isn't something that happens overnight. Usually the immigrant generation never gets fully integrated anyway and it is their kids that become integrated and learn the language and culture...and by the 3rd or 4th generation you usually have complete assimilation into the respective society.

The problem is, times change and these days its really hard to integrate. Irish and Italian immigrants to america did not have access to italian and irish sattelite channels, newspapers etc.

I think immigrants in the US are well-integrated. They retain their culture just like Irish and Italian immigrants and their children do now. But they consider themselves Americans. I think the problem might be is that in the US they're more widely accepted, but in Europe they're not as accepted. An Indian man can be considered American without a doubt, but it is probably harder for an Indian to be considered French by native Frenchman.

I think that's one of the reasons why the US is leading the world technologicaly, too. Why go to Europe where you're treated like a third-rate citizen when you can come to the US and be treated like anyone else? So, many more of the brightest people choose to come to the US for their studies and help make our society better.

Where in the Unistados de Mexico do you live?
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: MartyTheManiak
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: peonyu
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: peonyu
Maybe if the French bothered to enforce thier secular laws when they first allowed non-french to move there they wouldnt be having this problem now, but its a little to late now, at the rate that the Muslim immigrant population is growing France will have a Muslim majority in about 50 years.

...and this is assuming that all Muslims in france are militant...

and who the hell cares what the dominant religion is in the country? You make it sound like they should try to minimize all and any influence that Muslims in the country carry.


If they become a majority then they could vote in Sharia law, and since the majority of them are not integrated into society what says that they wouldnt ?

"You make it sound like they should try to minimize all and any influence that Muslims in the country carry."

I never said that.

They could - but how do you know that most of them will vote it in.

Look at the USA- the majority religion is christianity and we COULD go to some religous code also, but that doesn't mean it'll happen.

As for integration that isn't something that happens overnight. Usually the immigrant generation never gets fully integrated anyway and it is their kids that become integrated and learn the language and culture...and by the 3rd or 4th generation you usually have complete assimilation into the respective society.

The problem is, times change and these days its really hard to integrate. Irish and Italian immigrants to america did not have access to italian and irish sattelite channels, newspapers etc.

I think immigrants in the US are well-integrated. They retain their culture just like Irish and Italian immigrants and their children do now. But they consider themselves Americans. I think the problem might be is that in the US they're more widely accepted, but in Europe they're not as accepted. An Indian man can be considered American without a doubt, but it is probably harder for an Indian to be considered French by native Frenchman.

I think that's one of the reasons why the US is leading the world technologicaly, too. Why go to Europe where you're treated like a third-rate citizen when you can come to the US and be treated like anyone else? So, many more of the brightest people choose to come to the US for their studies and help make our society better.

Where in the Unistados de Mexico do you live?

Alabama and Massachusetts, recently Tennessee, too.

I'll admit I don't know much about Mexicans... I'm talking more about immigration from overseas.
 

peonyu

Platinum Member
Mar 12, 2003
2,038
23
81
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: MartyTheManiak
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: peonyu
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: peonyu
Maybe if the French bothered to enforce thier secular laws when they first allowed non-french to move there they wouldnt be having this problem now, but its a little to late now, at the rate that the Muslim immigrant population is growing France will have a Muslim majority in about 50 years.

...and this is assuming that all Muslims in france are militant...

and who the hell cares what the dominant religion is in the country? You make it sound like they should try to minimize all and any influence that Muslims in the country carry.


If they become a majority then they could vote in Sharia law, and since the majority of them are not integrated into society what says that they wouldnt ?

"You make it sound like they should try to minimize all and any influence that Muslims in the country carry."

I never said that.

They could - but how do you know that most of them will vote it in.

Look at the USA- the majority religion is christianity and we COULD go to some religous code also, but that doesn't mean it'll happen.

As for integration that isn't something that happens overnight. Usually the immigrant generation never gets fully integrated anyway and it is their kids that become integrated and learn the language and culture...and by the 3rd or 4th generation you usually have complete assimilation into the respective society.

The problem is, times change and these days its really hard to integrate. Irish and Italian immigrants to america did not have access to italian and irish sattelite channels, newspapers etc.

I think immigrants in the US are well-integrated. They retain their culture just like Irish and Italian immigrants and their children do now. But they consider themselves Americans. I think the problem might be is that in the US they're more widely accepted, but in Europe they're not as accepted. An Indian man can be considered American without a doubt, but it is probably harder for an Indian to be considered French by native Frenchman.

I think that's one of the reasons why the US is leading the world technologicaly, too. Why go to Europe where you're treated like a third-rate citizen when you can come to the US and be treated like anyone else? So, many more of the brightest people choose to come to the US for their studies and help make our society better.

Where in the Unistados de Mexico do you live?

Alabama and Massachusetts, recently Tennessee, too.

I'll admit I don't know much about Mexicans... I'm talking more about immigration from overseas.

Are you talking about European immigrants ? If so then its no surprise that they integrate so fast since there isnt a HUGE difference in lifestyle and culture between Europe and European-American dominated USA.
Non Europeans ARE harder to assimilate, and im not being racist or anything, but just being realistic about it. And that goes for immigration anywhere-- Put it this way, A Irishman who moves to Saudi arabia would be alot harder to assimilate than a Palestinian or Iraqi because the Irishman has to make far more adjustments, and if you throw in Irish language TV and newspapers then that will only make it harder to assimilate since he wouldnt have to become accustomed to Saudi ways.
And not to go to far off topic, but I think that is why people arnt saying 'assimilation' much anymore, and only talk about multi-culturalism, since it -may- not be possible to ever fully assimilate some groups [though asians seem to be an exception] due to religion ethics history or whatever else. But time will tell.
 

boran

Golden Member
Jun 17, 2001
1,526
0
76
Oh and someone earlier said Belgium is isnt as bad as France, lol at that.

Belgium

lets debunk that article a bit shall we:
Since 1999 the Belgian government is an absurd coalition, "arc-en-ciel" (rainbow) government of Socialists, Liberals, Christian Democrats and Greens ?
also he sais that teh walons control it, ha, what a big buncha lies, he obveously cannot understand out very, very, very complicated system of political parties, also he sais a rainbow of parties, once again, a blattant lie, at the moment he wrote that there was a purple green coalition; meaning the socialists, liberals and green party, the latter one just for good measure, nowadays it's just a purple coalition, thus socialists and liberals.

but from what I hear about the US politics, our socialists and liberals dont really resemble yours.

The usual spokesman of this strange formation is Foreign Minister Jean Louis Michel, whose outspokenness is only matched by his country?s irrelevance in the eyes of both Europeans and the world. For instance, his government decided that it has jurisdiction over all "crimes against humanity", "genocide" and so on, wherever, whenever, by whomever.

yesyes, that was our vague attempt at justice for the world, was a bad law, could be abused for too much political ends. it's gone now.

then he tells teh story about abou jahjah.

well, believe it or not, but I considder that quite a success story; he came here, as immigrant, was accepted ino our society, and went into poletics, what more can u ask from any citizen, suure he does not agree, but he has a right to disagree, and his citizens patrols is not illegal, and they have quit doing it since then because simply, the police was not racist.

also the author takes antwerp as example for belgium, well lemme tell ya, antwerp is the worst place in belgium to be, you dont judge a country by it's ugliest spot, you look at it overall.


now onto some of the comments there, we got good examples about very great malinformation.

Good point. However, as I've opined on other Threads.......Europe's Moose-limb immigrants are OUR Mexicans (ie. we BOTH seem to be using immigration to provide cheap labor and keep consumerism and our capitalist economies going). At least the Mexicans (and others from south of the border) are Christians.

That's almost KKK stuff he's saying right there, but against muslims. ppls it's just a religion, and it's like he thinks muslims would ever get a majority in voting, well lemme lighten up this situation a bit. the muslims in belgium dont make up 0.1 % of the belgian population.

man, i'm reading on, what a load of crap, I quote again:
An article recently posted on FR said that the most popular baby's name is Belgium is Mohammad. Sorry, Belgium. You have a beautiful country, but you're screwed.

most common name is simon for the guys, then laura for the girls, mohhamed is not even within the top 1000.

didnt read past page 1 of comments.
 

peonyu

Platinum Member
Mar 12, 2003
2,038
23
81
Originally posted by: boran
Oh and someone earlier said Belgium is isnt as bad as France, lol at that.

Belgium

lets debunk that article a bit shall we:
Since 1999 the Belgian government is an absurd coalition, "arc-en-ciel" (rainbow) government of Socialists, Liberals, Christian Democrats and Greens ?
also he sais that teh walons control it, ha, what a big buncha lies, he obveously cannot understand out very, very, very complicated system of political parties, also he sais a rainbow of parties, once again, a blattant lie, at the moment he wrote that there was a purple green coalition; meaning the socialists, liberals and green party, the latter one just for good measure, nowadays it's just a purple coalition, thus socialists and liberals.

but from what I hear about the US politics, our socialists and liberals dont really resemble yours.

The usual spokesman of this strange formation is Foreign Minister Jean Louis Michel, whose outspokenness is only matched by his country?s irrelevance in the eyes of both Europeans and the world. For instance, his government decided that it has jurisdiction over all "crimes against humanity", "genocide" and so on, wherever, whenever, by whomever.

yesyes, that was our vague attempt at justice for the world, was a bad law, could be abused for too much political ends. it's gone now.

then he tells teh story about abou jahjah.

well, believe it or not, but I considder that quite a success story; he came here, as immigrant, was accepted ino our society, and went into poletics, what more can u ask from any citizen, suure he does not agree, but he has a right to disagree, and his citizens patrols is not illegal, and they have quit doing it since then because simply, the police was not racist.

also the author takes antwerp as example for belgium, well lemme tell ya, antwerp is the worst place in belgium to be, you dont judge a country by it's ugliest spot, you look at it overall.


now onto some of the comments there, we got good examples about very great malinformation.

Good point. However, as I've opined on other Threads.......Europe's Moose-limb immigrants are OUR Mexicans (ie. we BOTH seem to be using immigration to provide cheap labor and keep consumerism and our capitalist economies going). At least the Mexicans (and others from south of the border) are Christians.

That's almost KKK stuff he's saying right there, but against muslims. ppls it's just a religion, and it's like he thinks muslims would ever get a majority in voting, well lemme lighten up this situation a bit. the muslims in belgium dont make up 0.1 % of the belgian population.

man, i'm reading on, what a load of crap, I quote again:
An article recently posted on FR said that the most popular baby's name is Belgium is Mohammad. Sorry, Belgium. You have a beautiful country, but you're screwed.

most common name is simon for the guys, then laura for the girls, mohhamed is not even within the top 1000.

didnt read past page 1 of comments.



I have been to Belgium only twice so yes that article may be partially incorrect, though you are wrong on the Muslim population percentage, there are far more muslims than 0.1%, its actually between 3.6%-5%.

link
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,265
126
Originally posted by: DragonMasterAlex
Well I can't speak for most Atheists, because I find them to be as disturbingly stupid as the Christian Fundamentalists, but my take is this:

Separation of church and state means that the government shall not officially *endorse* any religion of any kind. I would take this to mean *even Atheism.* I might also point out that this is strictly on a Federal level, and that there is no reason local governments cannot or should not have official religions. If a bunch of people who happen to be Quakers want to get together and form a town where the official religion is Quakerism (mmm...oatmeal...) I see no reason in the world why they should not be allowed to do so. We really need to bear in mind the work of men like Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in the area of securing religious liberty for everyone.

As Jefferson put it, "it makes no difference to me whether my neighbor claims there are no gods or twenty gods; it neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg."

Believe what you want, put up your symbols, it doesn't bother me and it *shouldn't* bother anyone else. Express yourself and respect the rights of others to do the same.

Jason

A mature attitude. Commendable.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: peonyu
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: CanOWorms
Originally posted by: MartyTheManiak
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: peonyu
Originally posted by: magomago
Originally posted by: peonyu
Maybe if the French bothered to enforce thier secular laws when they first allowed non-french to move there they wouldnt be having this problem now, but its a little to late now, at the rate that the Muslim immigrant population is growing France will have a Muslim majority in about 50 years.

...and this is assuming that all Muslims in france are militant...

and who the hell cares what the dominant religion is in the country? You make it sound like they should try to minimize all and any influence that Muslims in the country carry.


If they become a majority then they could vote in Sharia law, and since the majority of them are not integrated into society what says that they wouldnt ?

"You make it sound like they should try to minimize all and any influence that Muslims in the country carry."

I never said that.

They could - but how do you know that most of them will vote it in.

Look at the USA- the majority religion is christianity and we COULD go to some religous code also, but that doesn't mean it'll happen.

As for integration that isn't something that happens overnight. Usually the immigrant generation never gets fully integrated anyway and it is their kids that become integrated and learn the language and culture...and by the 3rd or 4th generation you usually have complete assimilation into the respective society.

The problem is, times change and these days its really hard to integrate. Irish and Italian immigrants to america did not have access to italian and irish sattelite channels, newspapers etc.

I think immigrants in the US are well-integrated. They retain their culture just like Irish and Italian immigrants and their children do now. But they consider themselves Americans. I think the problem might be is that in the US they're more widely accepted, but in Europe they're not as accepted. An Indian man can be considered American without a doubt, but it is probably harder for an Indian to be considered French by native Frenchman.

I think that's one of the reasons why the US is leading the world technologicaly, too. Why go to Europe where you're treated like a third-rate citizen when you can come to the US and be treated like anyone else? So, many more of the brightest people choose to come to the US for their studies and help make our society better.

Where in the Unistados de Mexico do you live?

Alabama and Massachusetts, recently Tennessee, too.

I'll admit I don't know much about Mexicans... I'm talking more about immigration from overseas.

Are you talking about European immigrants ? If so then its no surprise that they integrate so fast since there isnt a HUGE difference in lifestyle and culture between Europe and European-American dominated USA.
Non Europeans ARE harder to assimilate, and im not being racist or anything, but just being realistic about it. And that goes for immigration anywhere-- Put it this way, A Irishman who moves to Saudi arabia would be alot harder to assimilate than a Palestinian or Iraqi because the Irishman has to make far more adjustments, and if you throw in Irish language TV and newspapers then that will only make it harder to assimilate since he wouldnt have to become accustomed to Saudi ways.
And not to go to far off topic, but I think that is why people arnt saying 'assimilation' much anymore, and only talk about multi-culturalism, since it -may- not be possible to ever fully assimilate some groups [though asians seem to be an exception] due to religion ethics history or whatever else. But time will tell.

No, I'm really talking about immigrnats from the third-world like India, Pakistan, China, etc. They are all very well assimiliated into the US but still retain their culture just like Irish, Italian, etc. immigrants still retain their culture. They retain their ways as well as their new country's ways.

An Irishman might have trouble assimilating into Saudi Arabia because the natives might not accept him, similar to how Europeans view immigrants.
 

boran

Golden Member
Jun 17, 2001
1,526
0
76
hmmh, I'll check my source a bit, tho it'll be hard (newspaper, we allways get rid of it after a week or two)
but yes, those numbers will be correct, and mine wrong, I think my number might have been illegal muslims, since the article dealt with illegal immigration.

still 3.6 % is a far cry from 51% and then there's also the problem that there aint a muslim party yet. (AEL doesnt really count it was a party, but it is not partaking in political activities)
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: peonyu
Originally posted by: boran
Oh and someone earlier said Belgium is isnt as bad as France, lol at that.

Belgium

lets debunk that article a bit shall we:
Since 1999 the Belgian government is an absurd coalition, "arc-en-ciel" (rainbow) government of Socialists, Liberals, Christian Democrats and Greens ?
also he sais that teh walons control it, ha, what a big buncha lies, he obveously cannot understand out very, very, very complicated system of political parties, also he sais a rainbow of parties, once again, a blattant lie, at the moment he wrote that there was a purple green coalition; meaning the socialists, liberals and green party, the latter one just for good measure, nowadays it's just a purple coalition, thus socialists and liberals.

but from what I hear about the US politics, our socialists and liberals dont really resemble yours.

The usual spokesman of this strange formation is Foreign Minister Jean Louis Michel, whose outspokenness is only matched by his country?s irrelevance in the eyes of both Europeans and the world. For instance, his government decided that it has jurisdiction over all "crimes against humanity", "genocide" and so on, wherever, whenever, by whomever.

yesyes, that was our vague attempt at justice for the world, was a bad law, could be abused for too much political ends. it's gone now.

then he tells teh story about abou jahjah.

well, believe it or not, but I considder that quite a success story; he came here, as immigrant, was accepted ino our society, and went into poletics, what more can u ask from any citizen, suure he does not agree, but he has a right to disagree, and his citizens patrols is not illegal, and they have quit doing it since then because simply, the police was not racist.

also the author takes antwerp as example for belgium, well lemme tell ya, antwerp is the worst place in belgium to be, you dont judge a country by it's ugliest spot, you look at it overall.


now onto some of the comments there, we got good examples about very great malinformation.

Good point. However, as I've opined on other Threads.......Europe's Moose-limb immigrants are OUR Mexicans (ie. we BOTH seem to be using immigration to provide cheap labor and keep consumerism and our capitalist economies going). At least the Mexicans (and others from south of the border) are Christians.

That's almost KKK stuff he's saying right there, but against muslims. ppls it's just a religion, and it's like he thinks muslims would ever get a majority in voting, well lemme lighten up this situation a bit. the muslims in belgium dont make up 0.1 % of the belgian population.

man, i'm reading on, what a load of crap, I quote again:
An article recently posted on FR said that the most popular baby's name is Belgium is Mohammad. Sorry, Belgium. You have a beautiful country, but you're screwed.

most common name is simon for the guys, then laura for the girls, mohhamed is not even within the top 1000.

didnt read past page 1 of comments.



I have been to Belgium only twice so yes that article may be partially incorrect, though you are wrong on the Muslim population percentage, there are far more muslims than 0.1%, its actually between 3.6%-5%.

link

He probably views them as .1% of the population since he considers them third-rate citizens.
 

peonyu

Platinum Member
Mar 12, 2003
2,038
23
81
I wouldnt say that thier as assimilated as the Irish or Italians, but it may depend on where you live at I guess.
 

boran

Golden Member
Jun 17, 2001
1,526
0
76
He probably views them as .1% of the population since he considers them third-rate citizens.

would u please stop the nasty generalisation, okay, my numbers seem to be wrong, but there seems to be some general issue that we europeans are racists or sumething, well, there definetly are racists overhere, but they're not a majority.

my numbers were just wrong, sh!t happens.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: peonyu
I wouldnt say that thier as assimilated as the Irish or Italians, but it may depend on where you live at I guess.

I guess... why don't you think they're as assimilated? Is it because their customs/beliefs are a lot different? Like I said, they retain their ways and adopt some of ours, which is just like the Irish or Italians. Sure the Irish or Italian ways may seem more "normal" to you, but what the other immigrants retain is basically the same.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: boran
He probably views them as .1% of the population since he considers them third-rate citizens.

would u please stop the nasty generalisation, okay, my numbers seem to be wrong, but there seems to be some general issue that we europeans are racists or sumething, well, there definetly are racists overhere, but they're not a majority.

my numbers were just wrong, sh!t happens.

They're a very large portion of the population for this to be considered a generalization, just like saying Americans are fat lards (I'm not saying there aren't any racists in the US/Canada either). The general attitude there is very negative. Such a pity, too, since immigrants can help make a country stronger if you would accept them as your own.
 

boran

Golden Member
Jun 17, 2001
1,526
0
76
They're a very large portion of the population for this to be considered a generalization, just like saying Americans are fat lards (I'm not saying there aren't any racists in the US/Canada either). The general attitude there is very negative. Such a pity, too, since immigrants can help make a country stronger if you would accept them as your own.

... you just completely misunderstood me.

generalisation was about you saying europeans act like immigrants are third class citizens.
we dont.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: boran
^$They're a very large portion of the population for this to be considered a generalization, just like saying Americans are fat lards (I'm not saying there aren't any racists in the US/Canada either). The general attitude there is very negative. Such a pity, too, since immigrants can help make a country stronger if you would accept them as your own.

... you just completely misunderstood me.

generalisation was about you saying europeans act like immigrants are third class citizens.
we dont.[/quote]

I'd have to severely disagree about certain types of immigrants and their view of European countries in this case. You may think you don't, but they certainly feel different than you. Hell, I did, too.
 

boran

Golden Member
Jun 17, 2001
1,526
0
76
is feeling different that bad ?
I mean I'd feel different if I walked around anywhere else but belgium or the netherlands, the language is different, the customs are different, offcourse you would feel different and not very at yer comfort.
 
Feb 3, 2001
5,156
0
0
Well, suffice to say, I don't endorse the forcing of any form of belief on anyone (and no, liberating a people is NOT "forcing freedom" on them, only a moron would assert such a premise. Freedom is man's *natural* state and it is only FORCE that can take it away from him), even Atheism (which isn't really a belief, but an absence of belief specifically in a God. I hate when I ask people what they believe in and they say "I'm an Atheist". Well that's nice, but I didn't ask what you DON'T believe in! :)

On the Jew/Palestinian subject, all I can say is that if these people have nothing better to fight about than who worships the invisible man in the sky the right way, they should count themselves lucky and go the hell home. I mean what a *stupid* issue!

Jason

EDIT: Oh, and from an American point of view, I *LOVE* immigrants (the legal kind). Of all our citizens, they understand the most clearly how and why it is better to live in a system where individual rights are (mostly) protected by the government and where people are free to pursue their dreams within every legal means. They're WAY more astute than natural citizens, I suppose because they've *seen* the other side.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: boran
They're a very large portion of the population for this to be considered a generalization, just like saying Americans are fat lards (I'm not saying there aren't any racists in the US/Canada either). The general attitude there is very negative. Such a pity, too, since immigrants can help make a country stronger if you would accept them as your own.

... you just completely misunderstood me.

generalisation was about you saying europeans act like immigrants are third class citizens.
we dont.

I find that the immigrants themselves as well as visitors/tourists disagree with you. It's a common perception.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
Originally posted by: boran
is feeling different that bad ?
I mean I'd feel different if I walked around anywhere else but belgium or the netherlands, the language is different, the customs are different, offcourse you would feel different and not very at yer comfort.

No, I'm saying that their view is different than yours. I'm not saying you're right/wrong about how it really is, but about what the common opinion is like.
I find that Europeans mostly say 'We're not a melting pot like the US, so you can't compare the two' about things like this.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: boran
is feeling different that bad ?
I mean I'd feel different if I walked around anywhere else but belgium or the netherlands, the language is different, the customs are different, offcourse you would feel different and not very at yer comfort.

I think he meant difference in opinion on your treatment of people.
 

boran

Golden Member
Jun 17, 2001
1,526
0
76
I find that the immigrants themselves as well as visitors/tourists disagree with you. It's a common perception.

I know this might be hard to proove, but can you at least try, because right now I'm rather not inclined to believe you, I'll talk bout it on school tomorro with my foreign buddies, and ask em how they think about the subject.

and tourists, man, that wont be in belgium, you're treated like a king ;)

I cant speak on behalf of europe tho, and I dunno squat bout how it's goin' on in france, germany et all.

EDIT
I think he meant difference in opinion on your treatment of people.

well, I dont treat a foreigner or immigrant any differrent then I would treat someone from belgium, so no issue there, but I know for sure that at least 10% of the belgium population does not share my opinion on this (that 10% is national average the right wing party's get)