I heard in a private meeting, Navarro was arguing with Fauci about the weight of scientific evidence for HCQ by cherry picking a bunch of weak evidence and claiming that science supports its use. What a fucking clown.
troll boy gonna troll
Yea, and the asshole was on all over the air, still insisting that his opinion carries as much weight as someone who has gone to medical school. This is a perfect example of the people that Trump listens to.
The whole intent is to generate a false narrative. "Look at this anti-malarial drug that's so old that doctors rarely prescribe it anymore, the Great Trump knows it's a cure for the dreaded Chinese flu! And he could give it to you, if only these Medical Elitists weren't stopping him!"
It's not illegal to yell fire in a crowded theater if nobody reacts. However, if you go in to a crowded theater and yell anything that causes the crowd to react and someone gets hurt, that makes you liable.
Sure, as long as everyone is treated that way so that CNN, MSNBC, etc, are all required to give that same disclaimer.
So difficult to predict.
Well documented but you can't provide a single one of those documents.
Sure, as long as everyone is treated that way so that CNN, MSNBC, etc, are all required to give that same disclaimer.
Though if you're (royal you, not you personally) such a smooth brain that you still trust mainstream media at all to present facts with journalistic integrity then you probably get what you deserve
To be specific what I was referring to was this bit:
Broadcasting false content during news programming
The FCC is prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing on First Amendment rights of the press. It is, however, illegal for broadcasters to intentionally distort the news, and the FCC may act on complaints if there is documented evidence of such behavior from persons with direct personal knowledge. For more information, please see our consumer guide.
CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, NPR..... They all bend the truth and " intentionally distort" the news to suit their own agenda. Some more than others. I'm not saying Fox News is innocent of bending the pure facts to suit their agenda ( right ). Just that most do exactly the same thing.
These are the most and least trusted news outlets in the US
The most credibly perceived outlet among all adults was CBS. ABC was the most credible among Democrats, while Fox News topped Republicans' lists.www.businessinsider.com
Media Bias
Everyone is biased — and that’s okay. But hidden media bias misleads, manipulates and divides us. AllSides makes media bias transparent, helping you to easily identify different perspectives so you can get the full picture and think for yourself.www.allsides.com
Least Biased
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion ormediabiasfactcheck.com
And many of the shows that are attributed for this are commentary shows such as Hannity and Tucker etc... And are not News Broadcasts.
Yes, it was an opinion. Just like people who believe that every police shooting is justified are often of the opinion that they believe in freedom and limited govt.
Any show that intentionally spread misinformation that could harm the public. AFAIK, only Fox News has done that. If you have another example, enlighten us.
What's your point
Lest we forget.
