HomerJS
Lifer
Takes from the FCC website. One of these should doBecause of the 1A, courts have almost always held that there is no legal "duty" of reasonable care on the part of news broadcasters toward listeners. Which tends to preclude a negligence claim. A plaintiff could allege fraud which doesn't have 1A protection, but it is almost impossible to prove that the broadcaster intended that the listener rely on the false statements to his detriment. Ordinarily news outlets intend only that people watch and listen, bolstering their ratings. Proving that they intended specific action on the part of viewers is nigh impossible. Which is why I said earlier you would need a segment where they are telling people to ignore lockdown orders.
Ironically, the closest anyone has come to this is the litigious Devin Nunes, telling people it's a great time to eat at restaurants because it's easy to get a table now! Still, even in that case, a plaintiff would have to prove he listened to Nunes, believed him, went out, and as a direct result, caught the virus. You'd also have to prove Nunes knew that the advise was dangerous, that he's malevolent, not just a moron. Very hard to prove.
Broadcasting false information that causes substantial 'public harm'
The FCC prohibits broadcasting false information about a crime or a catastrophe if the broadcaster knows the information is false and will cause substantial "public harm" if aired.
FCC rules specifically say that "the public harm: must begin immediately and cause direct and actual damage to property or the health or safety of the general public; or divert law enforcement or public health and safety authorities from their duties."
Broadcasters may air disclaimers that clearly characterize programming as fiction to avoid violating FCC rules about public harm.
Broadcasting false content during news programming
The FCC is prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing on First Amendment rights of the press. It is, however, illegal for broadcasters to intentionally distort the news, and the FCC may act on complaints if there is documented evidence of such behavior from persons with direct personal knowledge. For more information, please see our consumer guide
Broadcast News Distortion
Broadcasters may not intentionally distort the news. The FCC states that "rigging or slanting the news is a most heinous act against the public interest."