• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Fox News sued for spreading misinformation to the public

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Because of the 1A, courts have almost always held that there is no legal "duty" of reasonable care on the part of news broadcasters toward listeners. Which tends to preclude a negligence claim. A plaintiff could allege fraud which doesn't have 1A protection, but it is almost impossible to prove that the broadcaster intended that the listener rely on the false statements to his detriment. Ordinarily news outlets intend only that people watch and listen, bolstering their ratings. Proving that they intended specific action on the part of viewers is nigh impossible. Which is why I said earlier you would need a segment where they are telling people to ignore lockdown orders.

Ironically, the closest anyone has come to this is the litigious Devin Nunes, telling people it's a great time to eat at restaurants because it's easy to get a table now! Still, even in that case, a plaintiff would have to prove he listened to Nunes, believed him, went out, and as a direct result, caught the virus. You'd also have to prove Nunes knew that the advise was dangerous, that he's malevolent, not just a moron. Very hard to prove.
Takes from the FCC website. One of these should do
Broadcasting false information that causes substantial 'public harm'

The FCC prohibits broadcasting false information about a crime or a catastrophe if the broadcaster knows the information is false and will cause substantial "public harm" if aired.


FCC rules specifically say that "the public harm: must begin immediately and cause direct and actual damage to property or the health or safety of the general public; or divert law enforcement or public health and safety authorities from their duties."

Broadcasters may air disclaimers that clearly characterize programming as fiction to avoid violating FCC rules about public harm.

Broadcasting false content during news programming

The FCC is prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing on First Amendment rights of the press. It is, however, illegal for broadcasters to intentionally distort the news, and the FCC may act on complaints if there is documented evidence of such behavior from persons with direct personal knowledge. For more information, please see our consumer guide

 
I think many ( if not all ) news broadcasts could be in trouble if interpreted the way you do.
Don't take my interpretation. The Murdoch family who owns Fox News cancelled a public birthday party so they could comply with social distancing. That is strong evidence Fox News knew what they were putting out over the air was utter bullshit.

That's the Murdoch family interpretation.
 
Really? I’ll take some examples that you think would qualify.
Don't take my interpretation. The Murdoch family who owns Fox News cancelled a public birthday party so they could comply with social distancing. That is strong evidence Fox News knew what they were putting out over the air was utter bullshit.

That's the Murdoch family interpretation.
It’s a secret!
super secret


To be specific what I was referring to was this bit:


Broadcasting false content during news programming

The FCC is prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing on First Amendment rights of the press. It is, however, illegal for broadcasters to intentionally distort the news, and the FCC may act on complaints if there is documented evidence of such behavior from persons with direct personal knowledge. For more information, please see our consumer guide.

CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, NPR..... They all bend the truth and " intentionally distort" the news to suit their own agenda. Some more than others. I'm not saying Fox News is innocent of bending the pure facts to suit their agenda ( right ). Just that most do exactly the same thing.





And many of the shows that are attributed for this are commentary shows such as Hannity and Tucker etc... And are not News Broadcasts.
 
To be specific what I was referring to was this bit:


Broadcasting false content during news programming

The FCC is prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing on First Amendment rights of the press. It is, however, illegal for broadcasters to intentionally distort the news, and the FCC may act on complaints if there is documented evidence of such behavior from persons with direct personal knowledge. For more information, please see our consumer guide.

CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, NPR..... They all bend the truth and " intentionally distort" the news to suit their own agenda. Some more than others. I'm not saying Fox News is innocent of bending the pure facts to suit their agenda ( right ). Just that most do exactly the same thing.





And many of the shows that are attributed for this are commentary shows such as Hannity and Tucker etc... And are not News Broadcasts.
So much energy to defend the indefensible. You own Fox stock?
 
To be specific what I was referring to was this bit:


Broadcasting false content during news programming

The FCC is prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing on First Amendment rights of the press. It is, however, illegal for broadcasters to intentionally distort the news, and the FCC may act on complaints if there is documented evidence of such behavior from persons with direct personal knowledge. For more information, please see our consumer guide.

CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, NPR..... They all bend the truth and " intentionally distort" the news to suit their own agenda. Some more than others. I'm not saying Fox News is innocent of bending the pure facts to suit their agenda ( right ). Just that most do exactly the same thing.





And many of the shows that are attributed for this are commentary shows such as Hannity and Tucker etc... And are not News Broadcasts.
There was a bias chart published last year and Fox News was rated much lower the CNN.

If you want to cite a specific example where CNN or MSNBC peddled information that was knowingly false that was a risk to the public then a reasonable discussion can be had. Otherwise your trolling is noted.
 
Last edited:
To be specific what I was referring to was this bit:


Broadcasting false content during news programming

The FCC is prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing on First Amendment rights of the press. It is, however, illegal for broadcasters to intentionally distort the news, and the FCC may act on complaints if there is documented evidence of such behavior from persons with direct personal knowledge. For more information, please see our consumer guide.

CNN, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, NPR..... They all bend the truth and " intentionally distort" the news to suit their own agenda. Some more than others. I'm not saying Fox News is innocent of bending the pure facts to suit their agenda ( right ). Just that most do exactly the same thing.





And many of the shows that are attributed for this are commentary shows such as Hannity and Tucker etc... And are not News Broadcasts.

haha, sure they're not. Most Watched, Most Trusted, Fox is the main stream media, and the opinion segments are what goldfish americans love the most. #dealwithit.
 
haha, sure they're not. Most Watched, Most Trusted, Fox is the main stream media, and the opinion segments are what goldfish americans love the most. #dealwithit.


The FCC rules you cited are dealing with News Broadcast not Opinion Segments.

They are all guilty of the same thing to various degrees. It is well documented.

#dealwithit.
 
Back
Top