• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Found another one: Ukraine store accidentally ships FX-8120 and it gets tested!

Black96ws6

Black96ws6

Member
And unfortunately, the results once again do not look good:

http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.overclockers.ua%2Fviewtopic.php%3Ff%3D2%26t%3D42451

file.php


bul4600.jpg


Unless I am reading it wrong (it's hard to understand due to Russian translation), but here are some choice quotes:

Put the amount of 20,000, and then quite baldly 32gflopsa look
Click to expand...

But even at this speed! Deneb 40 + Gflops issue at 3.5-3.8 GHz. Do bulldozer really so bad?
Click to expand...

But these tests do not recognize. Judging by him, my 1055 at 4GHz faster absolutely everywhere, including in the Marche. It's obviously absurd.
Click to expand...

Probably best to look after the results of normal BIOSes and firewood, and so on. Thanks to these (mystery remains a mystery), figs with him that the performance of one core is not better but as a phenomenon of 8 threads = 4 phenomenon is not clear, and eventually it loses six flow phenom in so much that the price of 8 be lower 4 Athlone.

Time will tell what it was but intel is just in front At least by the fact that the performance of one core is much higher.
Click to expand...

My translation of the above: This is really a 4c\8t chip that loses to 6C Thuban clock for clock, and in single threaded performance, Intel demolishes it.
 
Last edited:
It is going to be really ironic if the successor to K10 literally does turn out to be a K9 (woof woof) instead of a K11 🙁
 
How did AMD even attempt to put this out? at some point didnt they test it out and see the performance and say wait a min,this thing sux.

Omg that mem bench is pathetic
 
Idontcare said:
4.6 GHz, then 4.5, then 4.0...why is this guy bouncing all over the place with the clockspeed for these benches?
Click to expand...

In that gigantic thread, everyone is asking him to test a bunch of different ways, at least, that's sort of what I can pick out due to the Russian language translation :|
 
Black96ws6 said:
In that gigantic thread, everyone is asking him to test a bunch of different ways, at least, that's sort of what I can pick out due to the Russian language translation :|
Click to expand...

I see, they are trying to get an idea of the IPC comparison to Thuban and 2600K.

I was worried it was because he couldn't get the chip to run stable at 4.6GHz for the other benches.

I feel saddened for AMD if this is true, they've waited four long years for this to deliver them and its not happening if these benches are legit.
 
Could it possibly be a bad windows\scheduler\BIOS issue, in other words, would a better driver or perhaps a software patch improve BD's performance?
 
StrangerGuy said:
Quick! Anyone with a 2600K do the Winrar bench please at stock 3.4GHz.

I know my 2500K @ 4.3GHz is ~3800 MB/s.
Click to expand...

Is all you need to do is download the latest version and run the built-in test? If so, I'm running a 1090T@3.8Ghz w\2600NB, I can compare mine as well?
 
Black96ws6 said:
bulcinebench.jpg
Click to expand...
That's much better than the previous one, by about 2.66%. Still slower than a stock Core i7 2600K though..... :hmm:

Black96ws6 said:
bulprime.jpg
Click to expand...
That's slower than both Core i7 2600K and Phenom II X6 1100T at stock speeds...... :hmm:

StrangerGuy said:
Quick! Anyone with a 2600K do the Winrar bench please at stock 3.4GHz.

I know my 2500K @ 4.3GHz is ~3800 KB/s.
Click to expand...
The problem is that the test file parameter is unknown (file size, type and compression factor). As far as I can remember, the highest numbers I've seen are ~4.7GB/s on my friend's Core i7 920 @3.6GHZ, and ~4.5GB on Core i7 2600K @4.2GHz (with a 300MB high compression file). 😛
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top