• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Ford sux

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.


<< I won't touch your car based on what? That I assumed you had a stick shift as most GT Stangs do? >>



I would dare say that statement is true. Blueoval had the numbers at one time, but I believe there were more auto than manuals GTs and v6s. Anyways, I have the VIN right here. When can you run the oasis?
 
From what I've seen, Ford has kept the Mustang afloat during ever since the 'low quality' manufacturing began. In other words, I think they've put a little extra effort into the Mustang 😉

Millenium, I know where you're coming from. People talk so much trash about Dodge/Chrysler/Plymouth. They site them for making the most unreliable cars ever - but mine's still running like a watch after 10 years. *shrug*

It all depends on who you talk to / ask really...
 
<<From what I've seen, Ford has kept the Mustang afloat during ever since the 'low quality' manufacturing began. In other words, I think they've put a little extra effort into the Mustang >>

Just think of where the Mustang might be if......in 1989 the &quot;Fox&quot; body was replaced by a FRONT wheel drive car.....Ford was planning on doing this, but a public outcry changed their mind.
The FWD car then became the Probe.
 
Ok, how about this. Ford seems to have a lot of recalls because, unlike say, GM or Chrysler they would rather incur the cost of a recall than let you drive around risking your life.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top