Originally posted by: vi_edit
Dodge had better have their victory party for the Ram SRT quick because the new "L" will quickly crash it.
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Dodge had better have their victory party for the Ram SRT quick because the new "L" will quickly crash it.
The 03 L runs a 0-60 in 5.2, the same time the RAM SRT runs. All for about $17,000 less.
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Dodge had better have their victory party for the Ram SRT quick because the new "L" will quickly crash it.
The 03 L runs a 0-60 in 5.2, the same time the RAM SRT runs. All for about $17,000 less.
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Dodge had better have their victory party for the Ram SRT quick because the new "L" will quickly crash it.
The 03 L runs a 0-60 in 5.2, the same time the RAM SRT runs. All for about $17,000 less.
That was a fvcked up test drive though I think - I was the one who posted the specs from Motor Trend and the specs from MT from a 03 L. C&D and a few other mags are getting sub 5's for 0-60 and low 13's for 1/4. (Have yet to see one where the SRT10 breaks 12's though) I would still take a L in a heartbeat anyday over a SRT10. $1500 in bolt ons and I've got the SRT10 pwn3d like a b1tch.
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Dodge had better have their victory party for the Ram SRT quick because the new "L" will quickly crash it.
The 03 L runs a 0-60 in 5.2, the same time the RAM SRT runs. All for about $17,000 less.
That was a fvcked up test drive though I think - I was the one who posted the specs from Motor Trend and the specs from MT from a 03 L. C&D and a few other mags are getting sub 5's for 0-60 and low 13's for 1/4. (Have yet to see one where the SRT10 breaks 12's though) I would still take a L in a heartbeat anyday over a SRT10. $1500 in bolt ons and I've got the SRT10 pwn3d like a b1tch.
It wasn't you actually, several websites quoted the 5.2 0-60 and I just assumed that was it.