For U.S Citizens Only: Do you support universal health care

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

digitalsm

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2003
5,253
0
0
Originally posted by: MySoS
A few years ago I read an article which talked about people who can't get insurance, not because they can't afford insurance, but because no one will give them insurance because to keep them alive/healthy would cost hundreds of thousands a year. I found it very sad how everyone including the goverment made it seem like these people lives isn't worth the money it would take to keep them healthy. This is through no fault of their own. A few years ago I read an article which talked about people who can't get insurance, not because they can't afford insurance, but because no one will give them insurance because to keep them alive/healthy would cost hundreds of thousands a year. I found it very sad how everyone including the government made it seem like these people lives isn't worth the money it would take to keep them healthy. This is through no fault of their own.

Another thing do you know what happens to poor people with cancer. They don?t get treatment since they have no insurance and hospitals are not required to treat them. It is a sad thing really.

There are plenty of poor people who rack up millions in medical bills for cancer treatment.
 

DorkBoy

Diamond Member
Sep 25, 2000
3,591
0
0
Originally posted by: MySoS
I for one support it. There are countless people dropping dead each year in the U.S due to lack of medical insurance, and something needs to be done.


The weak should die anyways
 

Ryan

Lifer
Oct 31, 2000
27,519
2
81
Nope, and I say that as a poor college student who HAS insurance. I don't mind offering affordable health insurance to citizens, but I think we need to focus more on eliminating Social Security and focus on lessening the national deficit before any such issue is tackled.
 

alent1234

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,915
0
0
Originally posted by: MySoS
I for one support it. There are countless people dropping dead each year in the U.S due to lack of medical insurance, and something needs to be done.


the poor have medicaid
the small business people made a concious choice to go on their own and without employer provided health insurance

that pretty much covers everyone in the 40 million uninsured statistic that gets reported
 

flamingelephant

Golden Member
Jun 22, 2001
1,182
0
76
If the US ever does adopt something like this they should learn from Canada's mistakes with universal health care.
1) Have some kind of user fees: It helps prevent people from abusing the system. Right now in Canada its flu season, so you have all those idiots going to the hospital because they have the flu and want drugs. Can't get it through their heads that antibiotics dont do anything about the flu. Charge them a user fee, stop them form coming back and clogging the system
2)Don't restrict two tier access. If someone has the money to pay a private facility to get a procedure done now, let them. In Canada this is a grey area, and lots of rich just go to the US to pay for procedures instead of wating. We make them spend money in the US instead of spending it in Canada

Address those 2 issues and it could work.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,547
20,261
146
Not only no, but HELL no.

Look at any other government agency to see how horrible government health care would be. Go tour your local VA hospital.
 

MySoS

Senior member
Dec 7, 2004
490
0
0
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: MySoS
A few years ago I read an article which talked about people who can't get insurance, not because they can't afford insurance, but because no one will give them insurance because to keep them alive/healthy would cost hundreds of thousands a year. I found it very sad how everyone including the goverment made it seem like these people lives isn't worth the money it would take to keep them healthy. This is through no fault of their own. A few years ago I read an article which talked about people who can't get insurance, not because they can't afford insurance, but because no one will give them insurance because to keep them alive/healthy would cost hundreds of thousands a year. I found it very sad how everyone including the government made it seem like these people lives isn't worth the money it would take to keep them healthy. This is through no fault of their own.

Another thing do you know what happens to poor people with cancer. They don?t get treatment since they have no insurance and hospitals are not required to treat them. It is a sad thing really.

There are plenty of poor people who rack up millions in medical bills for cancer treatment.

Those are generally the elderly who get goverment medicare. I am talking about a poor person in thier 20s, if they have cancer no one will treat them.
 

Baked

Lifer
Dec 28, 2004
36,052
17
81
Never gonna happen, ever. What, you think health insurance companies are not gonna lobby the hell out of DC to stop this?
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
In a perfect world, yes, I would support a limited, minimum universal health care. Unfortunately, we don't live in a perfect world and government health care would be a bigger mess than the current health care situation.
 

SuperTool

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
14,000
2
0
Originally posted by: jjones
In a perfect world, yes, I would support a limited, minimum universal health care. Unfortunately, we don't live in a perfect world and government health care would be a bigger mess than the current health care situation.

If you do nothing, the current healthcare system will also be a bigger mess than it is today.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
I like the idea of a two tiered system. I would not want inferior or mediocre healthcare for myself like they have in Canada, but Canada covers all of their citizens. I wonder if a two tiered system is possible where some can keep private insurance and receive excellent medical care and a second lower tier healthcare (obviously not as good as private) offered by the government is very cheap to the less fortunate people.
 

crab

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2001
7,330
19
81
Dont even get me started on insurance. You've all heard my current fight with my ins co. Although I rely on medical care to survive, and now have no coverage and do not qualify for medicaid, I think a national care plan is unfair. It'll be abused to all hell just like welfare and everyone has to pay...no thanks. I'd like to see the current systems in place heavily reformed.

I'm trying to find a job to cover me, just like everyone else.
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,652
13,348
136
no. and if there is universal health care, it just means you pay for it through taxes instead. health care is never free, its just a matter of how you pay for it.
 

bigredguy

Platinum Member
Mar 18, 2001
2,457
0
0
I think something should be done to care for those unable to provide care for themselves and their family. I am not sure what, but something should be done.
 

Feldenak

Lifer
Jan 31, 2003
14,090
2
81
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Absolutely not.

Healthcare is not a right, and never will be.

Don't get me wrong, I don't enjoy paying medical bills either.

But I still do not support public healthcare.

Pretty much sums up my opinion as well.
 

scauffiel

Senior member
Aug 11, 2000
455
0
0
Originally posted by: MySoS
Those are generally the elderly who get goverment medicare. I am talking about a poor person in thier 20s, if they have cancer no one will treat them.

If you really have the courage of your convictions, maybe you should find one of these twentysomethings that has cancer and offer to pay their medical bills instead of stealing from me to pay for it. You could work two jobs and still go to school while you pay for their bills and the meager existence you can eke out for yourself. If you find you're becoming too well off and have too much time for yourself and your meager existence, you could find another of the 'countless' to personally finance.

LOL - "countless people dropping dead each year". :roll:

Oh, and I voted 'no'.

S.
 

KarenMarie

Elite Member
Sep 20, 2003
14,372
6
81
no one is entitled to free health care...
Live, liberty and the pursuit of happiness does not mean free government handouts.
And we have enough sponges on our system, we dont need more.
 

desteffy

Golden Member
Jul 16, 2004
1,911
0
0
I think we should definately have it.

For all you people who say we shouldnt, why not just get rid of police and fire too? and then have the fire dept charge us $5000 for coming to put out a fire, unless we buy insurance.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,547
20,261
146
Originally posted by: desteffy
I think we should definately have it.

For all you people who say we shouldnt, why not just get rid of police and fire too? and then have the fire dept charge us $5000 for coming to put out a fire, unless we buy insurance.

Fine, and the quality of health care can be the same as that of police protection. And doctors can be paid the same, guaranteeing great quality health care.

They'll come scrape your ass off the bed after you're dead.