RocksteadyDotNet
Diamond Member
- Jul 29, 2008
- 3,152
- 1
- 0
Originally posted by: Cogman
Originally posted by: RocksteadyDotNet
Originally posted by: Cogman
Originally posted by: RocksteadyDotNet
Wow. Just wow. How can Americans be so ignorant?
That's not how UHC works at all.
My country has it and it works just fine. Our free health care is probably just as good as yours.
And our private healthcare sector is far superior to yours.
Oh, sorry, I forgot it was wrong to speak from personal experience. Next time Ill just assume that my health system MUST suck because other people are doing something different!
I would like to know how you arrived at the conclusion that your healthcare system is far superior to the American system. Last I checked there weren't large amounts of Americans flying to country x to have some procedure done on them.
People from other countrys in the region fly to Australia for healthcare aswell.
And of course America is on the cutting edge with heaps of new medical technologies etc. You have 300 million people. We have 21 million.
For our size we a large contributers to healthcare technology.
And I wasnt saying your system didn't provide good care. I meant as a 'system' it isn't very good.
Ok, my misunderstanding then.
Perhaps UHC in Australia is far superior to that of England's NHS, I wouldn't know that. However, I haven't heard a whole lot of good things about other UHCs in general (I had a brother spend 2 years in Belgium, he spent a considerable time in the hospital after eating some hazelnut chocolate).
For me, the system works well enough, and knowing current government by trying to implement UHC we would have much to loose and little to gain.
Not all UHC systems are created equal. There're definitly good ones and bad ones.
If you're going down the path of a single insurer, and keep the hospitals etc private, then it's going to be a disaster.