WhipperSnapper
Lifer
- Oct 30, 2004
- 11,442
- 32
- 91
Is this a touchy-feely movie that merely condemns what most people would condemn without actually addressing some of the large underlying issues other than the easy target of corporate greed? Does it address how Malthusian forces and population explosion may be contributing to the problem? After all, when you have a nation of 300+ million hungry people, compromises are inevitable.
It's easy to condemn greedy businesses, but what about advocating for population stabilization, gradual population reduction, and an end to illegal immigration and legal immigration? I suspect that addressing some of the driving forces behind our nation's food quality problems would be very politically incorrect and that documentary filmmakers just don't have the cajones to do it.
Just to clarify the relationship between population and food quality, having a higher population means that less land is available for farming and herding and that the land is more expensive. So, instead of being able to have enough land so that chickens and can easily and affordably roam around, they end up in crowded pens. Also, the increased cost for land and resources gets passed right along to consumers, making it more difficult for them to be able to afford more expensive, more wholesome food. (Of course, since people also have to pay more money for real estate and other resources and goods as a result of population explosion, they also have less money for high quality food.)
So, I am left wondering, will people who are concerned about food quality come out in opposition to legal immigration and illegal immigration?
It's easy to condemn greedy businesses, but what about advocating for population stabilization, gradual population reduction, and an end to illegal immigration and legal immigration? I suspect that addressing some of the driving forces behind our nation's food quality problems would be very politically incorrect and that documentary filmmakers just don't have the cajones to do it.
Just to clarify the relationship between population and food quality, having a higher population means that less land is available for farming and herding and that the land is more expensive. So, instead of being able to have enough land so that chickens and can easily and affordably roam around, they end up in crowded pens. Also, the increased cost for land and resources gets passed right along to consumers, making it more difficult for them to be able to afford more expensive, more wholesome food. (Of course, since people also have to pay more money for real estate and other resources and goods as a result of population explosion, they also have less money for high quality food.)
So, I am left wondering, will people who are concerned about food quality come out in opposition to legal immigration and illegal immigration?